Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Gujarat High Court Case Commentaries

Benefit of Doubt in Central Excise Appeals: Gujarat High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision in Commr. Of C. Ex., Cus. & Ser. Tax, Daman v. Nissan Thermoware P. Ltd.

Benefit of Doubt in Central Excise Appeals: Gujarat High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision in Commr. Of C. Ex., Cus. & Ser. Tax, Daman v. Nissan Thermoware P. Ltd.

Date: Dec 10, 2010
Benefit of Doubt in Central Excise Appeals: Gujarat High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision in Commr. Of C. Ex., Cus. & Ser. Tax, Daman v. Nissan Thermoware P. Ltd. Introduction The case of Commr. Of...
Clarifying Limitation Periods and Suppression of Facts in Customs Duty Assessments: Insights from Commissioner of C. Ex. & Cus., Vadodara-II v. Orbit Fabrics Ltd.

Clarifying Limitation Periods and Suppression of Facts in Customs Duty Assessments: Insights from Commissioner of C. Ex. & Cus., Vadodara-II v. Orbit Fabrics Ltd.

Date: Dec 10, 2010
Clarifying Limitation Periods and Suppression of Facts in Customs Duty Assessments: Insights from Commissioner of C. Ex. & Cus., Vadodara-II v. Orbit Fabrics Ltd. Introduction The case of...
Gujarat High Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Proving Clandestine Manufacture Under Central Excise Act

Gujarat High Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Proving Clandestine Manufacture Under Central Excise Act

Date: Dec 10, 2010
Gujarat High Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Proving Clandestine Manufacture Under Central Excise Act Introduction The case of Commr. of C. Ex., Cus. & Ser. Tax, Daman v. Nissan Thermoware...
Clarification on Section 68 Additions and Section 80-IA Deductions: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ambuja Ginning, Pressing And Oil Co. P. Ltd.

Clarification on Section 68 Additions and Section 80-IA Deductions: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ambuja Ginning, Pressing And Oil Co. P. Ltd.

Date: Nov 30, 2010
Clarification on Section 68 Additions and Section 80-IA Deductions: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ambuja Ginning, Pressing And Oil Co. P. Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v....
Transparency in Religious Charitable Trusts: Rajendra Vasantlal Shah v. Central Information Commissioner

Transparency in Religious Charitable Trusts: Rajendra Vasantlal Shah v. Central Information Commissioner

Date: Nov 27, 2010
Transparency in Religious Charitable Trusts: Rajendra Vasantlal Shah v. Central Information Commissioner Introduction The case of Rajendra Vasantlal Shah v. Central Information Commissioner, New...
Reasonable Delay in Statutory Proceedings: Labhubhai Valjibhai Gajera v. Secretary, Revenue Dept.

Reasonable Delay in Statutory Proceedings: Labhubhai Valjibhai Gajera v. Secretary, Revenue Dept.

Date: Oct 29, 2010
Reasonable Delay in Statutory Proceedings: Labhubhai Valjibhai Gajera v. Secretary, Revenue Dept. Introduction The case of Labhubhai Valjibhai Gajera (S) v. Secretary (Appeals), Revenue Dept.,...
Gujarat High Court Upholds Capital Gain Classification in Income Tax Case

Gujarat High Court Upholds Capital Gain Classification in Income Tax Case

Date: Oct 22, 2010
Gujarat High Court Upholds Capital Gain Classification in Income Tax Case Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax-I (S) v. Niraj Amidhar Surti Opponent(S) presented before the Gujarat...
Establishing Cause of Action: Insights from Chandrakant Kantilal Jhaveri v. Madhuriben Gautambhai

Establishing Cause of Action: Insights from Chandrakant Kantilal Jhaveri v. Madhuriben Gautambhai

Date: Oct 20, 2010
Establishing Cause of Action: Insights from Chandrakant Kantilal Jhaveri v. Madhuriben Gautambhai 1. Introduction The case of Chandrakant Kantilal Jhaveri v. Madhuriben Gautambhai adjudicated by the...
Gujarat High Court's Landmark Judgment on Detention Under PASA Act: Aartiben v. Commissioner Of Police

Gujarat High Court's Landmark Judgment on Detention Under PASA Act: Aartiben v. Commissioner Of Police

Date: Oct 9, 2010
Gujarat High Court's Landmark Judgment on Detention Under PASA Act: Aartiben v. Commissioner Of Police Introduction The case of Aartiben v. Commissioner Of Police was adjudicated by the Gujarat High...
Interest on Delayed Cenvat Credit Refunds: Gujarat High Court's Landmark Decision in Commissioner Of Central Excise (S) v. Reliance Industries Limited

Interest on Delayed Cenvat Credit Refunds: Gujarat High Court's Landmark Decision in Commissioner Of Central Excise (S) v. Reliance Industries Limited

Date: Oct 8, 2010
Interest on Delayed Cenvat Credit Refunds: Gujarat High Court's Landmark Decision in Commissioner Of Central Excise (S) v. Reliance Industries Limited Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Central...
Gujarat High Court Quashes Amendment Regulations 2010: Upholding Equal Treatment for Customs House Agents

Gujarat High Court Quashes Amendment Regulations 2010: Upholding Equal Treatment for Customs House Agents

Date: Oct 2, 2010
Gujarat High Court Quashes Amendment Regulations 2010: Upholding Equal Treatment for Customs House Agents Introduction The case of Ravindra K Joshi Petitioner(S) v. Union Of India Through Under...
Secured Creditor Priority Over Government Claims in the Absence of Specific Statutory Provisions: Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. District Magistrate

Secured Creditor Priority Over Government Claims in the Absence of Specific Statutory Provisions: Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. District Magistrate

Date: Sep 18, 2010
Secured Creditor Priority Over Government Claims in the Absence of Specific Statutory Provisions: Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. District Magistrate Introduction The case of Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v....
Clarifying Penalty Imposition under Central Excise Rules: Insights from Commissioner Of Central Excise & Customs (S) v. Saurashtra Cement Ltd.

Clarifying Penalty Imposition under Central Excise Rules: Insights from Commissioner Of Central Excise & Customs (S) v. Saurashtra Cement Ltd.

Date: Sep 17, 2010
Clarifying Penalty Imposition under Central Excise Rules: Insights from Commissioner Of Central Excise & Customs (S) v. Saurashtra Cement Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Central Excise...
Interpretation of Penal Provisions Under Central Excise Rules: Insights from Commissioner of C. Ex. & Customs v. Saurashtra Cement Ltd.

Interpretation of Penal Provisions Under Central Excise Rules: Insights from Commissioner of C. Ex. & Customs v. Saurashtra Cement Ltd.

Date: Sep 17, 2010
Interpretation of Penal Provisions Under Central Excise Rules: Insights from Commissioner of C. Ex. & Customs v. Saurashtra Cement Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner of C. Ex. & Customs v....
Equitable Valuation Principles in Land Acquisition: State Of Gujarat v. Amaji Mohanji Thakore

Equitable Valuation Principles in Land Acquisition: State Of Gujarat v. Amaji Mohanji Thakore

Date: Sep 10, 2010
Equitable Valuation Principles in Land Acquisition: State Of Gujarat v. Amaji Mohanji Thakore Introduction The case of State Of Gujarat v. Amaji Mohanji Thakore was adjudicated by the Gujarat High...
Sterling Gelatin Opponent(S): Pioneering Clarity on Cenvat Credit Rules for Common Inputs and By-products

Sterling Gelatin Opponent(S): Pioneering Clarity on Cenvat Credit Rules for Common Inputs and By-products

Date: Sep 10, 2010
Sterling Gelatin Opponent(S): Pioneering Clarity on Cenvat Credit Rules for Common Inputs and By-products Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Central Excise & Customs Vadodara - I (S) v....
Gujarat High Court Rules Companies Cannot Be Agriculturists under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948

Gujarat High Court Rules Companies Cannot Be Agriculturists under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948

Date: Sep 1, 2010
Gujarat High Court Rules Companies Cannot Be Agriculturists under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Introduction The case of State Of Gujarat & 2 (S) v. Prathmesh Farms Pvt. Ltd. &...
Affirmation of 'Agriculturist' as Natural Person under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948: State v. Prathmesh

Affirmation of 'Agriculturist' as Natural Person under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948: State v. Prathmesh

Date: Sep 1, 2010
Affirmation of 'Agriculturist' as Natural Person under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948: State v. Prathmesh Introduction State v. Prathmesh, adjudicated by the Gujarat High Court...
Gujarat High Court Establishes Time Limits for Reassessment Under Section 147

Gujarat High Court Establishes Time Limits for Reassessment Under Section 147

Date: Jul 21, 2010
Gujarat High Court Establishes Time Limits for Reassessment Under Section 147 Introduction The case of Sadbhav Engineering Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax was adjudicated by the Gujarat...
Presumption of Social Customs in Income Tax Assessments: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Ratanlal Vyaparilal Jain

Presumption of Social Customs in Income Tax Assessments: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Ratanlal Vyaparilal Jain

Date: Jul 20, 2010
Presumption of Social Customs in Income Tax Assessments: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Ratanlal Vyaparilal Jain Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ratanlal Vyaparilal Jain...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert