Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

CESTAT Case Commentaries

Exemption Eligibility for Job Workers under Notifications 1/93-C.E. and 214/86-C.E.: Analysis of Desh Rolling Mills v. Commissioner of Central Excise

Exemption Eligibility for Job Workers under Notifications 1/93-C.E. and 214/86-C.E.: Analysis of Desh Rolling Mills v. Commissioner of Central Excise

Date: Jul 4, 2000
Exemption Eligibility for Job Workers under Notifications 1/93-C.E. and 214/86-C.E.: Analysis of Desh Rolling Mills v. Commissioner of Central Excise Introduction The case of Desh Rolling Mills v....
Rail Tech v. Commissioner Of Central Excise: Precedent on CETA Classification and Remedial Measures

Rail Tech v. Commissioner Of Central Excise: Precedent on CETA Classification and Remedial Measures

Date: Jun 9, 2000
Rail Tech v. Commissioner Of Central Excise: Precedent on CETA Classification and Remedial Measures Introduction Rail Tech v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Chandigarh is a landmark judgment...
Lubricants and Greases Recognized as 'Inputs' under Rule 57A for Modvat Credit: CESTAT Decision in Commissioner Of Custom & C. Ex., Meerut-I v. Modi Rubber Ltd.

Lubricants and Greases Recognized as 'Inputs' under Rule 57A for Modvat Credit: CESTAT Decision in Commissioner Of Custom & C. Ex., Meerut-I v. Modi Rubber Ltd.

Date: May 20, 2000
Lubricants and Greases Recognized as 'Inputs' under Rule 57A for Modvat Credit: CESTAT Decision in Commissioner Of Custom & C. Ex., Meerut-I v. Modi Rubber Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner...
Mandatory Production of Duplicate Invoices for Modvat Credit: CESTAT Clarifies Central Excise Rules in Commissioner Of C. Ex., New Delhi v. Avis Electronics Pvt. Ltd.

Mandatory Production of Duplicate Invoices for Modvat Credit: CESTAT Clarifies Central Excise Rules in Commissioner Of C. Ex., New Delhi v. Avis Electronics Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Feb 22, 2000
Mandatory Production of Duplicate Invoices for Modvat Credit: CESTAT Clarifies Central Excise Rules in Commissioner Of C. Ex., New Delhi v. Avis Electronics Pvt. Ltd. 1. Introduction The case of...
CESTAT Establishes Rigorous Standards for Classification and Evidence in Excise Cases: Zarafshan Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh

CESTAT Establishes Rigorous Standards for Classification and Evidence in Excise Cases: Zarafshan Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh

Date: Dec 17, 1999
CESTAT Establishes Rigorous Standards for Classification and Evidence in Excise Cases: Zarafshan Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh Introduction In the landmark case of...
Reaffirmation of Transaction Value in Customs Valuation: Collector Of Customs v. Grover Imports

Reaffirmation of Transaction Value in Customs Valuation: Collector Of Customs v. Grover Imports

Date: Oct 8, 1999
Reaffirmation of Transaction Value in Customs Valuation: Collector Of Customs v. Grover Imports Introduction The case of Collector Of Customs, New Delhi v. Grover Imports adjudicated by the Customs,...
Geep Industrial Syndicate Ltd. v. Collector Of C. Ex., Allahabad: Clarification on Modvat Credit Utilization and Duty Exemptions on Scrap

Geep Industrial Syndicate Ltd. v. Collector Of C. Ex., Allahabad: Clarification on Modvat Credit Utilization and Duty Exemptions on Scrap

Date: Sep 1, 1999
Geep Industrial Syndicate Ltd. v. Collector Of C. Ex., Allahabad: Clarification on Modvat Credit Utilization and Duty Exemptions on Scrap Introduction The case of Geep Industrial Syndicate Ltd. v....
Chinku Exports v. Commissioner Of Customs: Jurisdictional Clarity under FERA and Customs Act

Chinku Exports v. Commissioner Of Customs: Jurisdictional Clarity under FERA and Customs Act

Date: Jun 24, 1999
Chinku Exports v. Commissioner Of Customs: Jurisdictional Clarity under FERA and Customs Act Introduction The case of Chinku Exports v. Commissioner Of Customs, Calcutta adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Classification of Composite Goods under Central Excise: Nestle (India) Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Mumbai

Classification of Composite Goods under Central Excise: Nestle (India) Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Mumbai

Date: May 22, 1999
Classification of Composite Goods under Central Excise: Nestle (India) Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Mumbai Introduction The case of Nestle (India) Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise,...
Abatement of Subsequent Central Excise Duty from Sale Price - Srichakra Tyres Ltd. v. Collector Of Central Excise, Madras

Abatement of Subsequent Central Excise Duty from Sale Price - Srichakra Tyres Ltd. v. Collector Of Central Excise, Madras

Date: Mar 13, 1999
Abatement of Subsequent Central Excise Duty from Sale Price Srichakra Tyres Ltd. v. Collector Of Central Excise, Madras (CESTAT, 1999) Introduction The case of Srichakra Tyres Ltd. v. Collector Of...
Customs Duty Exemption and Import Licensing: Insights from Commissioner Of Customs, Mumbai v. Carpet House

Customs Duty Exemption and Import Licensing: Insights from Commissioner Of Customs, Mumbai v. Carpet House

Date: Oct 21, 1998
Customs Duty Exemption and Import Licensing: Insights from Commissioner Of Customs, Mumbai v. Carpet House Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Customs, Mumbai v. Carpet House deliberated on the...
Limitation on Exemption Notifications for Parts under Tariff Heading 82.02: Collector Of Central Excise, Mumbai v. Samyak Tools

Limitation on Exemption Notifications for Parts under Tariff Heading 82.02: Collector Of Central Excise, Mumbai v. Samyak Tools

Date: Jul 29, 1998
Limitation on Exemption Notifications for Parts under Tariff Heading 82.02: Collector Of Central Excise, Mumbai v. Samyak Tools Introduction The case of Collector of Central Excise, Mumbai v. Samyak...
CESTAT Upholds Arm’s Length Transaction Value in Related Party Customs Valuation: Commissioner Of Customs, Chennai v. Hewlett Packard Ltd.

CESTAT Upholds Arm’s Length Transaction Value in Related Party Customs Valuation: Commissioner Of Customs, Chennai v. Hewlett Packard Ltd.

Date: Jul 11, 1998
CESTAT Upholds Arm’s Length Transaction Value in Related Party Customs Valuation: Commissioner Of Customs, Chennai v. Hewlett Packard Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Customs, Chennai v....
Invalidation of Unauthorized Permissions Under Rule 57F: Insights from Reliance Industries v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Mumbai-III

Invalidation of Unauthorized Permissions Under Rule 57F: Insights from Reliance Industries v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Mumbai-III

Date: Jun 4, 1998
Invalidation of Unauthorized Permissions Under Rule 57F: Insights from Reliance Industries v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Mumbai-III Introduction The case of Reliance Industries v. Commissioner of...
Electricity Consumption as Evidence in Estimating Clandestine Production: Nagpal Steels Ltd. v. Collector Of C. Ex., Chandigarh

Electricity Consumption as Evidence in Estimating Clandestine Production: Nagpal Steels Ltd. v. Collector Of C. Ex., Chandigarh

Date: Jan 17, 1998
Electricity Consumption as Evidence in Estimating Clandestine Production: Nagpal Steels Ltd. v. Collector Of C. Ex., Chandigarh Introduction Nagpal Steels Ltd. v. Collector Of Central Excise,...
Eligibility Criteria for Concessional Duty: Asha Celluloid v. Collector Of Central Excise, Surat

Eligibility Criteria for Concessional Duty: Asha Celluloid v. Collector Of Central Excise, Surat

Date: Dec 11, 1997
Eligibility Criteria for Concessional Duty: Asha Celluloid v. Collector Of Central Excise, Surat Introduction The case of Asha Celluloid v. Collector Of Central Excise, Surat adjudicated by the...
CESTAT Clarifies Jurisdiction for Show Cause Notices Under Section 28(1) and Links Duty Demand with Confiscation and Penalties

CESTAT Clarifies Jurisdiction for Show Cause Notices Under Section 28(1) and Links Duty Demand with Confiscation and Penalties

Date: Jul 1, 1997
CESTAT Clarifies Jurisdiction for Show Cause Notices Under Section 28(1) and Links Duty Demand with Confiscation and Penalties Introduction The case of Bakeman's Home Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Collector...
Replenishment Criteria and Burden of Proof in Customs Importation: Insights from Garment Craft v. Commissioner Of Customs, Mumbai

Replenishment Criteria and Burden of Proof in Customs Importation: Insights from Garment Craft v. Commissioner Of Customs, Mumbai

Date: Sep 26, 1996
Replenishment Criteria and Burden of Proof in Customs Importation: Insights from Garment Craft v. Commissioner Of Customs, Mumbai Introduction The case of Garment Craft vs. Commissioner Of Customs,...
Reliability of Private Records and Confessional Statements in Central Excise Cases: Gurpreet Rubber Industries v. Collector Of C. Ex., Chandigarh

Reliability of Private Records and Confessional Statements in Central Excise Cases: Gurpreet Rubber Industries v. Collector Of C. Ex., Chandigarh

Date: Dec 14, 1995
Reliability of Private Records and Confessional Statements in Central Excise Cases: Gurpreet Rubber Industries v. Collector Of C. Ex., Chandigarh Introduction The case of Gurpreet Rubber Industries...
Pan Asia Enterprises v. Collector Of Customs: A Comprehensive Analysis of Customs Valuation Rules

Pan Asia Enterprises v. Collector Of Customs: A Comprehensive Analysis of Customs Valuation Rules

Date: Jun 6, 1995
Pan Asia Enterprises v. Collector Of Customs: A Comprehensive Analysis of Customs Valuation Rules Introduction Pan Asia Enterprises v. Collector Of Customs, Bombay is a landmark judgment delivered by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert