Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Andhra Pradesh High Court Case Commentaries

Pinnaka Hanumantha Rao v. Garlapati Dhanalakshmi Andallu: Affirming Testamentary Validity Amid Estranged Family Dynamics

Pinnaka Hanumantha Rao v. Garlapati Dhanalakshmi Andallu: Affirming Testamentary Validity Amid Estranged Family Dynamics

Date: Jan 26, 2007
Pinnaka Hanumantha Rao v. Garlapati Dhanalakshmi Andallu: Affirming Testamentary Validity Amid Estranged Family Dynamics Introduction The case of Pinnaka Hanumantha Rao (Died) Per Lr And Another v....
Amarnath Vyas v. State Of A.P: Clarifying the Bailable Nature of Section 63 Copyright Offences

Amarnath Vyas v. State Of A.P: Clarifying the Bailable Nature of Section 63 Copyright Offences

Date: Dec 20, 2006
Amarnath Vyas v. State Of A.P: Clarifying the Bailable Nature of Section 63 Copyright Offences Introduction The case of Amarnath Vyas v. State Of A.P adjudicated by the Andhra Pradesh High Court on...
Andhra Pradesh High Court Reinforces Mandatory Procedures for Telecommunication Interception under Indian Telegraph Act

Andhra Pradesh High Court Reinforces Mandatory Procedures for Telecommunication Interception under Indian Telegraph Act

Date: Dec 12, 2006
Andhra Pradesh High Court Reinforces Mandatory Procedures for Telecommunication Interception under Indian Telegraph Act Introduction In the case of Smt. K.L.D Nagasree v. Government Of India & Ors.,...
Quashing of Criminal Proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.: Insights from Sanapareddy Maheedhar Seshagiri v. State Of A.P.

Quashing of Criminal Proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.: Insights from Sanapareddy Maheedhar Seshagiri v. State Of A.P.

Date: Dec 7, 2006
Quashing of Criminal Proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.: Insights from Sanapareddy Maheedhar Seshagiri v. State Of A.P. Introduction The case of Sanapareddy Maheedhar Seshagiri v. State Of A.P....
Reinforcing Procedural Fairness and Jurisdictional Clarity in Assigned Lands Cases: Commentary on Dasari Narayana Rao v. Deputy Collector And Mandal Revenue Officer

Reinforcing Procedural Fairness and Jurisdictional Clarity in Assigned Lands Cases: Commentary on Dasari Narayana Rao v. Deputy Collector And Mandal Revenue Officer

Date: Nov 24, 2006
Reinforcing Procedural Fairness and Jurisdictional Clarity in Assigned Lands Cases: Commentary on Dasari Narayana Rao v. Deputy Collector And Mandal Revenue Officer Introduction The case of Dasari...
Inherent Power of Registering Officers and the Nullification of Sale Deeds: An Analysis of Yanala Malleshwari v. Ananthula Sayamma

Inherent Power of Registering Officers and the Nullification of Sale Deeds: An Analysis of Yanala Malleshwari v. Ananthula Sayamma

Date: Oct 25, 2006
Inherent Power of Registering Officers and the Nullification of Sale Deeds: An Analysis of Yanala Malleshwari v. Ananthula Sayamma Introduction Yanala Malleshwari v. Ananthula Sayamma is a landmark...
One Taxable Event Established in Works Contracts: Larsen & Toubro v. State of Andhra Pradesh

One Taxable Event Established in Works Contracts: Larsen & Toubro v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Date: Oct 13, 2006
One Taxable Event Established in Works Contracts: Larsen & Toubro Limited And Another v. State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others Introduction The case of Larsen & Toubro Limited And Another v. State Of...
DNA Testing in Matrimonial Disputes: A New Precedent Set by Smt. B. Vandana Kumari v. P. Praveen Kumar & Anr.

DNA Testing in Matrimonial Disputes: A New Precedent Set by Smt. B. Vandana Kumari v. P. Praveen Kumar & Anr.

Date: Sep 27, 2006
DNA Testing in Matrimonial Disputes: A New Precedent Set by Smt. B. Vandana Kumari v. P. Praveen Kumar & Anr. Introduction The case of Smt. B. Vandana Kumari v. P. Praveen Kumar & Anr. adjudicated by...
Employment on Compassionate Grounds Does Not Bar Compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act

Employment on Compassionate Grounds Does Not Bar Compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act

Date: Sep 6, 2006
Employment on Compassionate Grounds Does Not Bar Compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act Introduction The case State Of Andhra Pradesh And Another v. K. Pushpalatha And Others was adjudicated by...
Doctrine of Us Pendens and Impleading Transferees: Insights from Pannala Renuka v. Kavali Venkataiah

Doctrine of Us Pendens and Impleading Transferees: Insights from Pannala Renuka v. Kavali Venkataiah

Date: Sep 2, 2006
Doctrine of Us Pendens and Impleading Transferees: Insights from Pannala Renuka v. Kavali Venkataiah Introduction The legal dispute in Pannala Renuka v. Kavali (Rajumouni) Venkataiah before the...
Stamp Duty on Sale Agreements with Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court's Interpretation

Stamp Duty on Sale Agreements with Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court's Interpretation

Date: Aug 19, 2006
Stamp Duty on Sale Agreements with Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court's Interpretation Introduction The case of M/S. Sri Tirumala Housing (P) Ltd. v. M/S. Gpr Housing (P) Ltd., Hyd. was...
Entitlement to Incentives Despite Policy Amendments: G.S. Oils Ltd. v. GM District Industries Centre, Adilabad

Entitlement to Incentives Despite Policy Amendments: G.S. Oils Ltd. v. GM District Industries Centre, Adilabad

Date: Aug 11, 2006
Entitlement to Incentives Despite Policy Amendments: G.S. Oils Ltd. v. GM District Industries Centre, Adilabad Introduction The case of G.S. Oils Ltd., Adilabad v. General Manager, District...
Andhra Pradesh High Court Establishes Civil Courts as Sole Adjudicators for Succession in Protected Tenancy

Andhra Pradesh High Court Establishes Civil Courts as Sole Adjudicators for Succession in Protected Tenancy

Date: Jul 8, 2006
Andhra Pradesh High Court Establishes Civil Courts as Sole Adjudicators for Succession in Protected Tenancy Introduction The case of Syed Abdul Majeed v. Joint Collector-II, Ranga Reddy District...
Purchasers’ Ineligibility to Claim Exemptions under G.O. Ms. No. 733 in Parchuri Ratnakar Rao v. State Of A.P And Others

Purchasers’ Ineligibility to Claim Exemptions under G.O. Ms. No. 733 in Parchuri Ratnakar Rao v. State Of A.P And Others

Date: Jun 28, 2006
Purchasers’ Ineligibility to Claim Exemptions under G.O. Ms. No. 733 in Parchuri Ratnakar Rao v. State Of A.P And Others Introduction Parchuri Ratnakar Rao v. State Of A.P And Others is a significant...
Affirmation of Compensation Under Voided Contracts via Section 70: Insights from M/S Union Of India v. Col. L.S.N Murthy & Anr.

Affirmation of Compensation Under Voided Contracts via Section 70: Insights from M/S Union Of India v. Col. L.S.N Murthy & Anr.

Date: Apr 28, 2006
Affirmation of Compensation Under Voided Contracts via Section 70: Insights from M/S Union Of India v. Col. L.S.N Murthy & Anr. Introduction The case of M/S Union Of India v. Col. L.S.N Murthy &...
Mandatory Coverage of Vehicle Drivers without Extra Premium & Accurate Assessment of Loss of Earning Capacity: Insights from National Insurance v. D. Sivasankar

Mandatory Coverage of Vehicle Drivers without Extra Premium & Accurate Assessment of Loss of Earning Capacity: Insights from National Insurance v. D. Sivasankar

Date: Apr 27, 2006
Mandatory Coverage of Vehicle Drivers without Extra Premium & Accurate Assessment of Loss of Earning Capacity: Insights from National Insurance v. D. Sivasankar Introduction The case of National...
Prejudice to Accused from Delay in Analyst Reports Requires Evidential Support: Hyderabad Beverages Pvt Ltd. v. State of A.P.

Prejudice to Accused from Delay in Analyst Reports Requires Evidential Support: Hyderabad Beverages Pvt Ltd. v. State of A.P.

Date: Apr 19, 2006
Prejudice to Accused from Delay in Analyst Reports Requires Evidential Support: Hyderabad Beverages Pvt Ltd. v. State of A.P. Introduction The case of M/S. Hyderabad Beverages Private Limited v....
Clarifying Municipal Authority in Granting Building Permissions Amid Title Disputes: T. Rameshwar v. Commissioner, MCH

Clarifying Municipal Authority in Granting Building Permissions Amid Title Disputes: T. Rameshwar v. Commissioner, MCH

Date: Mar 19, 2006
Clarifying Municipal Authority in Granting Building Permissions Amid Title Disputes: T. Rameshwar v. Commissioner, MCH Introduction The case of T. Rameshwar v. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Of...
Reaffirming the Standards for Mental Cruelty in Divorce Proceedings: Chiranjeevi v. Smt. Lavanya

Reaffirming the Standards for Mental Cruelty in Divorce Proceedings: Chiranjeevi v. Smt. Lavanya

Date: Mar 10, 2006
Reaffirming the Standards for Mental Cruelty in Divorce Proceedings: Chiranjeevi v. Smt. Lavanya Introduction The case of Chiranjeevi v. Smt. Lavanya adjudicated by the Andhra Pradesh High Court on...
Sai Priya Construction Co. v. K. Anantha Kumari Satya Raju: Key Clarifications on Section 9 Interim Measures under the Arbitration Act

Sai Priya Construction Co. v. K. Anantha Kumari Satya Raju: Key Clarifications on Section 9 Interim Measures under the Arbitration Act

Date: Feb 9, 2006
Sai Priya Construction Co. v. K. Anantha Kumari Satya Raju: Key Clarifications on Section 9 Interim Measures under the Arbitration Act Introduction The case of Sai Priya Construction Company v. K....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert