Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Andhra Pradesh High Court Case Commentaries

Defining Contempt of Court: An Analysis of D. Jones Shield v. N. Ramesam And Others

Defining Contempt of Court: An Analysis of D. Jones Shield v. N. Ramesam And Others

Date: Jan 29, 1955
Defining Contempt of Court: An Analysis of D. Jones Shield v. N. Ramesam And Others 1. Introduction The case of D. Jones Shield v. N. Ramesam And Others was adjudicated by the Andhra Pradesh High...
Katragadda Virayya v. Katragadda Venkata Subbayya: Establishing the Principle of Subsequent Partition Suits in Tenancy-in-Common Scenarios

Katragadda Virayya v. Katragadda Venkata Subbayya: Establishing the Principle of Subsequent Partition Suits in Tenancy-in-Common Scenarios

Date: Jan 22, 1955
Katragadda Virayya v. Katragadda Venkata Subbayya: Establishing the Principle of Subsequent Partition Suits in Tenancy-in-Common Scenarios Introduction The case of Katragadda Virayya v. Katragadda...
Boddu Seetharamaswamy v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Non-Appealability of Penal Interest Orders under Section 18-A(6)

Boddu Seetharamaswamy v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Non-Appealability of Penal Interest Orders under Section 18-A(6)

Date: Jan 13, 1955
Boddu Seetharamaswamy v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Non-Appealability of Penal Interest Orders under Section 18-A(6) Introduction The case of Boddu Seetharamaswamy v. Commissioner Of Income Tax was...
Strict Interpretation of Section 145 CPC in Bhadramma And Another v. Kotam Raj

Strict Interpretation of Section 145 CPC in Bhadramma And Another v. Kotam Raj

Date: Jan 12, 1955
Strict Interpretation of Section 145 CPC in Bhadramma And Another v. Kotam Raj Introduction Bhadramma And Another v. Kotam Raj is a landmark judgment delivered by the Andhra Pradesh High Court on...
Stare Decisis and Co-ordinate Jurisdiction: Andhra Pradesh High Court Bound by Pre-1954 Madras High Court Decisions

Stare Decisis and Co-ordinate Jurisdiction: Andhra Pradesh High Court Bound by Pre-1954 Madras High Court Decisions

Date: Dec 7, 1954
Stare Decisis and Co-ordinate Jurisdiction: Andhra Pradesh High Court Bound by Pre-1954 Madras High Court Decisions Introduction The landmark case of M. Subbarayudu And Others Accused v. The State,...
Restitution Under Void Promissory Notes: Insights from Budhulal v. Deccan Banking Company Ltd.

Restitution Under Void Promissory Notes: Insights from Budhulal v. Deccan Banking Company Ltd.

Date: Nov 24, 1954
Restitution Under Void Promissory Notes: Insights from Budhulal v. Deccan Banking Company Ltd. Introduction The case of Budhulal v. Deccan Banking Company Ltd. adjudicated by the Andhra Pradesh High...
Interpretation of Section 69(2) in Partnership Dissolution Cases: Maddi Sudarsanam v. Boorugu Viswanadham Bros. (1954)

Interpretation of Section 69(2) in Partnership Dissolution Cases: Maddi Sudarsanam v. Boorugu Viswanadham Bros. (1954)

Date: Sep 18, 1954
Interpretation of Section 69(2) in Partnership Dissolution Cases: Maddi Sudarsanam v. Boorugu Viswanadham Bros. (1954) Introduction The case of Maddi Sudarsanam v. Boorugu Viswanadham Bros....
M. Gnanamani v. His Excellency, The Governor Of Andhra: Defining the Boundaries of Gubernatorial Immunity under Article 361

M. Gnanamani v. His Excellency, The Governor Of Andhra: Defining the Boundaries of Gubernatorial Immunity under Article 361

Date: Sep 1, 1954
M. Gnanamani v. His Excellency, The Governor Of Andhra: Defining the Boundaries of Gubernatorial Immunity under Article 361 Introduction The case of M. Gnanamani v. His Excellency, The Governor Of...
Recognition of Oral Agreements Over Registered Documents in Specific Performance: Mummidi Reddi Papannagiri Yella Reddi v. Salla Subbi Reddi And Others

Recognition of Oral Agreements Over Registered Documents in Specific Performance: Mummidi Reddi Papannagiri Yella Reddi v. Salla Subbi Reddi And Others

Date: Jul 17, 1954
Recognition of Oral Agreements Over Registered Documents in Specific Performance Introduction The case of Mummidi Reddi Papannagiri Yella Reddi v. Salla Subbi Reddi And Others, adjudicated by the...
Establishing Non-Retroactivity of Section 53-A in Property Disputes: Jahangir Begum v. Gulam Ali Ahmed

Establishing Non-Retroactivity of Section 53-A in Property Disputes: Jahangir Begum v. Gulam Ali Ahmed

Date: Apr 8, 1954
Establishing Non-Retroactivity of Section 53-A in Property Disputes: Jahangir Begum v. Gulam Ali Ahmed Introduction The case of Jahangir Begum v. Gulam Ali Ahmed, adjudicated by the Andhra Pradesh...
Criteria for Amending Pleadings Under Order 6, Rule 17: Maruti And Others v. Ranganath

Criteria for Amending Pleadings Under Order 6, Rule 17: Maruti And Others v. Ranganath

Date: Mar 11, 1954
Criteria for Amending Pleadings Under Order 6, Rule 17: Maruti And Others v. Ranganath Introduction The landmark case of Maruti And Others v. Ranganath, adjudicated by the Andhra Pradesh High Court...
Moti Bai v. Kand Kari Channaya: Voidance of Pre-Emption Rights Under Article 13 of the Indian Constitution

Moti Bai v. Kand Kari Channaya: Voidance of Pre-Emption Rights Under Article 13 of the Indian Constitution

Date: Nov 24, 1953
Moti Bai v. Kand Kari Channaya: Voidance of Pre-Emption Rights Under Article 13 of the Indian Constitution Introduction The landmark case of Moti Bai and Others v. Kand Kari Channaya heard by the...
Jurisdiction in Suits on Promissory Notes: Andhra Pradesh High Court in Sailum Eshwarayya v. Thakur Devi Singh

Jurisdiction in Suits on Promissory Notes: Andhra Pradesh High Court in Sailum Eshwarayya v. Thakur Devi Singh

Date: Aug 6, 1953
Jurisdiction in Suits on Promissory Notes: Andhra Pradesh High Court in Sailum Eshwarayya v. Thakur Devi Singh Introduction Case: Sailum Eshwarayya v. Thakur Devi Singh Court: Andhra Pradesh High...
Equal Protection under Article 14 and the Validation of Special Tribunals: Insights from Abdur Rahim v. Joseph Pinto

Equal Protection under Article 14 and the Validation of Special Tribunals: Insights from Abdur Rahim v. Joseph Pinto

Date: Nov 14, 1950
Equal Protection under Article 14 and the Validation of Special Tribunals: Insights from Abdur Rahim v. Joseph Pinto Introduction The case of Abdur Rahim And Others v. Joseph A. Pinto And Others...
Previous
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert