Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Andhra Pradesh High Court Case Commentaries

Interest on Refunds Pursuant to Appellate Orders: Andhra Pradesh High Court Clarifies Applicability of Section 244 over Section 214

Interest on Refunds Pursuant to Appellate Orders: Andhra Pradesh High Court Clarifies Applicability of Section 244 over Section 214

Date: Feb 22, 1979
Interest on Refunds Pursuant to Appellate Orders: Andhra Pradesh High Court Clarifies Applicability of Section 244 over Section 214 Introduction The case of Trustees Of H.E.H The Nizam's Religious...
Affirming Labour Court Jurisdiction for Statutory Bonus and Minimum Wage Claims: Anand Oil Industries v. Labour Court, Hyderabad

Affirming Labour Court Jurisdiction for Statutory Bonus and Minimum Wage Claims: Anand Oil Industries v. Labour Court, Hyderabad

Date: Dec 29, 1978
Affirming Labour Court Jurisdiction for Statutory Bonus and Minimum Wage Claims Anand Oil Industries v. Labour Court, Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh High Court | Date: 28 December 1978 Introduction The...
High Court's Inherent Powers Under Section 482 Cr.P.C: Insights from Puritipati Jagga Reddi Case

High Court's Inherent Powers Under Section 482 Cr.P.C: Insights from Puritipati Jagga Reddi Case

Date: Dec 5, 1978
High Court's Inherent Powers Under Section 482 Cr.P.C: Insights from Puritipati Jagga Reddi Case Introduction The landmark judgment in Puritipati Jagga Reddi delivered by the Andhra Pradesh High...
Liberal Interpretation of Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC: Necessity of Adding Necessary Parties for Comprehensive Adjudication

Liberal Interpretation of Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC: Necessity of Adding Necessary Parties for Comprehensive Adjudication

Date: Nov 15, 1978
Liberal Interpretation of Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC: Necessity of Adding Necessary Parties for Comprehensive Adjudication Introduction The case of Khaja Abdul Khader, President, Managing Committee,...
Prohibition of Strikes Under Section 10(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act: Insights from Eenadu Press Workers' Union v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Prohibition of Strikes Under Section 10(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act: Insights from Eenadu Press Workers' Union v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Date: Oct 28, 1978
Prohibition of Strikes Under Section 10(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act: Insights from Eenadu Press Workers' Union v. Government of Andhra Pradesh Introduction The case of Eenadu Press Workers'...
Comprehensive Analysis of B. Lakshmikantha Rao v. D. Chinna Mallaiah: Interpreting section 9-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951

Comprehensive Analysis of B. Lakshmikantha Rao v. D. Chinna Mallaiah: Interpreting section 9-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951

Date: Sep 9, 1978
Comprehensive Analysis of B. Lakshmikantha Rao v. D. Chinna Mallaiah: Interpreting section 9-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Introduction The case of B. Lakshmikantha Rao v. D. Chinna...
Defining 'Holding' and 'Possession' under Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms: Insights from T. Gopal Reddy v. State Of Andhra Pradesh

Defining 'Holding' and 'Possession' under Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms: Insights from T. Gopal Reddy v. State Of Andhra Pradesh

Date: Aug 1, 1978
Defining 'Holding' and 'Possession' under Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms: Insights from T. Gopal Reddy v. State Of Andhra Pradesh Introduction The case of T. Gopal Reddy v. State Of Andhra Pradesh,...
Independent Exercise of Quasi-Judicial Appellate Powers: Kalari Nagabhushana Rao v. The Collector Commentary

Independent Exercise of Quasi-Judicial Appellate Powers: Kalari Nagabhushana Rao v. The Collector Commentary

Date: Jul 27, 1978
Independent Exercise of Quasi-Judicial Appellate Powers: Analysis of Kalari Nagabhushana Rao v. The Collector Introduction The case of Kalari Nagabhushana Rao v. The Collector, Panchayatat Wing...
Self-Assessment Scheme and Seizure of Goods: Insights from Southern Steel Ltd v. Union of India

Self-Assessment Scheme and Seizure of Goods: Insights from Southern Steel Ltd v. Union of India

Date: Jul 14, 1978
Self-Assessment Scheme and Seizure of Goods: Insights from Southern Steel Ltd, Hyderabad v. Union of India Introduction The case of Southern Steel Ltd, Hyderabad v. Union of India And Others,...
Enforceability of Execution Petitions Under Article 136 Limitation Act: Insights from Posani Ramachandraiah v. Daggupati Sashamma

Enforceability of Execution Petitions Under Article 136 Limitation Act: Insights from Posani Ramachandraiah v. Daggupati Sashamma

Date: Apr 1, 1978
Enforceability of Execution Petitions Under Article 136 Limitation Act: Insights from Posani Ramachandraiah In Both v. Daggupati Sashamma Introduction The case of Posani Ramachandraiah In Both v....
Descent-Based Reservation in Banking Recruitment Declared Unconstitutional under Articles 14 & 16

Descent-Based Reservation in Banking Recruitment Declared Unconstitutional under Articles 14 & 16

Date: Mar 10, 1978
Descent-Based Reservation in Banking Recruitment Declared Unconstitutional under Articles 14 & 16 Introduction The case of Geeta (P.S) And Others v. Central Bank of India, Bombay, And Another...
Establishing 'Business Connection' Under the Income Tax Act: Insights from Bharat Heavy Plate & Vessels Ltd. v. Addl. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Establishing 'Business Connection' Under the Income Tax Act: Insights from Bharat Heavy Plate & Vessels Ltd. v. Addl. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Mar 1, 1978
Establishing 'Business Connection' Under the Income Tax Act: Insights from Bharat Heavy Plate & Vessels Ltd. v. Addl. Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Bharat Heavy Plate & Vessels...
Section 275 Limitation Period Applies to All Stages of Penalty Proceedings: Insights from Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. N.V. Ganapathi Rao

Section 275 Limitation Period Applies to All Stages of Penalty Proceedings: Insights from Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. N.V. Ganapathi Rao

Date: Feb 28, 1978
Section 275 Limitation Period Applies to All Stages of Penalty Proceedings: Insights from Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. N.V. Ganapathi Rao Introduction The case of Addl. Commissioner Of Income...
P. Satyanarayana v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Establishing Trading Loss as Deductible Under Section 28 of the I.T. Act

P. Satyanarayana v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Establishing Trading Loss as Deductible Under Section 28 of the I.T. Act

Date: Feb 24, 1978
P. Satyanarayana v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Establishing Trading Loss as Deductible Under Section 28 of the I.T. Act Introduction The case of P. Satyanarayana v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, A.P,...
Exigent Standards for Proving Impotency in Hindu Marriage Nullity: Smt. Suvarna v. G.M Achary

Exigent Standards for Proving Impotency in Hindu Marriage Nullity: Smt. Suvarna v. G.M Achary

Date: Feb 23, 1978
Exigent Standards for Proving Impotency in Hindu Marriage Nullity: Smt. Suvarna v. G.M Achary Introduction Smt. Suvarna v. G.M Achary is a landmark judgment delivered by the Andhra Pradesh High Court...
Clarifying Section 11 Conditions for Tax Exemption: Commissioner Of Income-Tax, A.P-I v. Trustee Of H.E.H The Nizam'S Supplemental Religious Endowment Trust

Clarifying Section 11 Conditions for Tax Exemption: Commissioner Of Income-Tax, A.P-I v. Trustee Of H.E.H The Nizam'S Supplemental Religious Endowment Trust

Date: Feb 11, 1978
Clarifying Section 11 Conditions for Tax Exemption: Commissioner Of Income-Tax, A.P-I v. Trustee Of H.E.H The Nizam'S Supplemental Religious Endowment Trust Introduction The case of Commissioner Of...
Ensuring Transparency in Promotion: The Landmark Judgment in M.K Prasad v. Government of India

Ensuring Transparency in Promotion: The Landmark Judgment in M.K Prasad v. Government of India

Date: Feb 11, 1978
Ensuring Transparency in Promotion: The Landmark Judgment in M.K Prasad v. Government of India Introduction The case of M.K Prasad (Petitioner) v. Government Of India And Ors. was adjudicated by the...
Interpretation of Excise Rebate Notifications in Sugar Production: Etikoppaka Co-Operative Agricultural Society Ltd. v. Union Of India

Interpretation of Excise Rebate Notifications in Sugar Production: Etikoppaka Co-Operative Agricultural Society Ltd. v. Union Of India

Date: Feb 4, 1978
Interpretation of Excise Rebate Notifications in Sugar Production: Etikoppaka Co-Operative Agricultural Society Ltd. v. Union Of India Introduction The case of Etikoppaka Co-Operative Agricultural...
Comprehensive Interpretation of 'Plant' and 'Debts Owed' under Rule 19A and Section 80J: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax v. Warner Hindustan Ltd.

Comprehensive Interpretation of 'Plant' and 'Debts Owed' under Rule 19A and Section 80J: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax v. Warner Hindustan Ltd.

Date: Jan 19, 1978
Comprehensive Interpretation of 'Plant' and 'Debts Owed' under Rule 19A and Section 80J: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax v. Warner Hindustan Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner of...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Forest Law Enforcement: Insights from State Of Andhra Pradesh v. P.K. Mahammad

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Forest Law Enforcement: Insights from State Of Andhra Pradesh v. P.K. Mahammad

Date: Dec 9, 1977
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Forest Law Enforcement: Insights from State Of Andhra Pradesh v. P.K. Mahammad Introduction The case of State Of Andhra Pradesh v. P.K. Mahammad, adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert