Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Andhra Pradesh High Court Case Commentaries

Insurance Liability under Section 95 of the Motor Vehicles Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court's Landmark Judgment

Insurance Liability under Section 95 of the Motor Vehicles Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court's Landmark Judgment

Date: Oct 19, 1986
Insurance Liability under Section 95 of the Motor Vehicles Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court's Landmark Judgment Introduction The Andhra Pradesh High Court rendered a significant judgment on October 18,...
Godavari Plywoods Ltd. Judgment: Investment Subsidy Does Not Reduce Actual Cost for Depreciation under Income-Tax Act

Godavari Plywoods Ltd. Judgment: Investment Subsidy Does Not Reduce Actual Cost for Depreciation under Income-Tax Act

Date: Oct 18, 1986
Godavari Plywoods Ltd. Judgment: Investment Subsidy Does Not Reduce Actual Cost for Depreciation under Income-Tax Act Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Godavari Plywoods Ltd....
Judgment Commentary: Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Skoda Export, Praha - Establishing the Predominance Test in Determining Income Accrual Location

Judgment Commentary: Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Skoda Export, Praha - Establishing the Predominance Test in Determining Income Accrual Location

Date: Oct 18, 1986
Establishing the Predominance Test: A Comprehensive Analysis of Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Skoda Export, Praha Introduction The case of Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Skoda...
Non-Continuation of Hindu Undivided Family Post-Partition Suit for Income Tax Assessments

Non-Continuation of Hindu Undivided Family Post-Partition Suit for Income Tax Assessments

Date: Sep 19, 1986
Non-Continuation of Hindu Undivided Family Post-Partition Suit for Income Tax Assessments Introduction The case of Addl. Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. P. Durgamma adjudicated by the Andhra Pradesh...
V. Narayana Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh: A Comprehensive Legal Commentary

V. Narayana Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh: A Comprehensive Legal Commentary

Date: Sep 6, 1986
V. Narayana Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh: A Comprehensive Legal Commentary Introduction The case of V. Narayana Rao And Another v. State Of Andhra Pradesh, And Another was adjudicated by the Andhra...
Protecting Property Rights through Order 21 Rule 97 and Inherent Judicial Powers: Insights from Smt. Tahera Sayeed v. M. Shanmugam

Protecting Property Rights through Order 21 Rule 97 and Inherent Judicial Powers: Insights from Smt. Tahera Sayeed v. M. Shanmugam

Date: Jul 2, 1986
Protecting Property Rights through Order 21 Rule 97 and Inherent Judicial Powers: Insights from Smt. Tahera Sayeed v. M. Shanmugam And Others Introduction The case of Smt. Tahera Sayeed v. M....
Clarifying Burden of Proof for Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Abdul Bakshi Brothers

Clarifying Burden of Proof for Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Abdul Bakshi Brothers

Date: Mar 29, 1986
Clarifying Burden of Proof for Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Abdul Bakshi Brothers Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Andhra...
Absolute Liability in Excise Law: Nizam Sugar Factory Ltd. v. Collector Of Central Excise

Absolute Liability in Excise Law: Nizam Sugar Factory Ltd. v. Collector Of Central Excise

Date: Mar 6, 1986
Absolute Liability in Excise Law: Nizam Sugar Factory Ltd. v. Collector Of Central Excise Introduction The case of Nizam Sugar Factory Ltd. v. Collector Of Central Excise And Others, adjudicated by...
Raj Sheel v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh: Upholding Integrated Taxation of Packaging Materials under Sales Tax Act

Raj Sheel v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh: Upholding Integrated Taxation of Packaging Materials under Sales Tax Act

Date: Mar 1, 1986
Raj Sheel v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh: Upholding Integrated Taxation of Packaging Materials under Sales Tax Act Introduction The case of Raj Sheel v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh adjudicated by the...
Adoption and Backward Class Reservation: Insights from A.S Sailaja v. Principal, Kurnool Medical College

Adoption and Backward Class Reservation: Insights from A.S Sailaja v. Principal, Kurnool Medical College

Date: Feb 20, 1986
Adoption and Backward Class Reservation: Insights from A.S Sailaja v. Principal, Kurnool Medical College Introduction The case of A.S Sailaja v. Principal, Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool And Others...
Expanded Jurisdiction for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 CrPC: Insights from Smt. Sheik Khasim Bi v. The State

Expanded Jurisdiction for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 CrPC: Insights from Smt. Sheik Khasim Bi v. The State

Date: Feb 8, 1986
Expanded Jurisdiction for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 CrPC: Insights from Smt. Sheik Khasim Bi v. The State Introduction Smt. Sheik Khasim Bi v. The State is a landmark judgment delivered by...
Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds 45-Day Membership Cutoff for Voting Eligibility in Cooperative Societies

Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds 45-Day Membership Cutoff for Voting Eligibility in Cooperative Societies

Date: Jan 24, 1986
Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds 45-Day Membership Cutoff for Voting Eligibility in Cooperative Societies Introduction The case of Gogineni Mallikarjuna Rao And Others v. State Of A.P Rep, By Its...
Affirming Constitutional Protections Against Discriminatory Government Directives: Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1986)

Affirming Constitutional Protections Against Discriminatory Government Directives: Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1986)

Date: Jan 24, 1986
Affirming Constitutional Protections Against Discriminatory Government Directives: Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1986) Introduction The case of Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., Bombay...
Kothuri Venkata Subba Rao v. District Registrar Of Assurances, Guntur: Defining the Nature of Release vs. Conveyance Deeds

Kothuri Venkata Subba Rao v. District Registrar Of Assurances, Guntur: Defining the Nature of Release vs. Conveyance Deeds

Date: Aug 17, 1985
Kothuri Venkata Subba Rao v. District Registrar Of Assurances, Guntur: Defining the Nature of Release vs. Conveyance Deeds Introduction Kothuri Venkata Subba Rao v. District Registrar Of Assurances,...
Classification of Contract Carriage vs Stage Carriage for Taxation Purposes: V. Govindarajulu v. Regional Transport Officer

Classification of Contract Carriage vs Stage Carriage for Taxation Purposes: V. Govindarajulu v. Regional Transport Officer

Date: Aug 7, 1985
Classification of Contract Carriage vs Stage Carriage for Taxation Purposes: V. Govindarajulu v. Regional Transport Officer Introduction The case of V. Govindarajulu And Etc. v. The Regional...
Jurisdictional Clarity in Wage Recovery: Mandegam R. Reddy v. Sri Bharathi Velu Bus Service

Jurisdictional Clarity in Wage Recovery: Mandegam R. Reddy v. Sri Bharathi Velu Bus Service

Date: Aug 6, 1985
Jurisdictional Clarity in Wage Recovery: Mandegam R. Reddy v. Sri Bharathi Velu Bus Service Introduction The case of Mandegam Radhakrishna Reddy v. Sri Bharathi Velu Bus Service (Andhra Pradesh High...
Establishing Ownership Rights of Protected Tenants under Section 38-E: Ushanna v. Sambu Goud

Establishing Ownership Rights of Protected Tenants under Section 38-E: Ushanna v. Sambu Goud

Date: Aug 2, 1985
Establishing Ownership Rights of Protected Tenants under Section 38-E Ushanna And Others v. Sambu Goud (Died) Per Lrs. Keshav And Others Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Date: August 1, 1985 1....
K. Omprakash v. K. Nalini: High Court Interprets Section 13-B(2) as Directory, Facilitating Immediate Divorce by Mutual Consent

K. Omprakash v. K. Nalini: High Court Interprets Section 13-B(2) as Directory, Facilitating Immediate Divorce by Mutual Consent

Date: Jul 16, 1985
K. Omprakash v. K. Nalini: High Court Interprets Section 13-B(2) as Directory, Facilitating Immediate Divorce by Mutual Consent Introduction K. Omprakash v. K. Nalini is a landmark judgment delivered...
Affirming University Autonomy: Independent Powers of Chancellor in Vice-Chancellor Appointments – M. Kiran Babu v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Affirming University Autonomy: Independent Powers of Chancellor in Vice-Chancellor Appointments – M. Kiran Babu v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Date: Jul 13, 1985
Affirming University Autonomy: Independent Powers of Chancellor in Vice-Chancellor Appointments – M. Kiran Babu v. Government of Andhra Pradesh Introduction The case of M. Kiran Babu v. Government Of...
Interpretation and Application of Motor Vehicles Act Provisions on Insurance Transferability and Insurable Interest: Insights from Madineni Kondaiah v Yaseen Fatima

Interpretation and Application of Motor Vehicles Act Provisions on Insurance Transferability and Insurable Interest: Insights from Madineni Kondaiah v Yaseen Fatima

Date: Jun 23, 1985
Interpretation and Application of Motor Vehicles Act Provisions on Insurance Transferability and Insurable Interest: Insights from Madineni Kondaiah v. Yaseen Fatima Introduction The case of Madineni...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert