Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Validity of Tenancy Agreements under Rent Control Acts: Insights from Udhoo Dass v. Prem Prakash

Validity of Tenancy Agreements under Rent Control Acts: Insights from Udhoo Dass v. Prem Prakash

Date: Feb 7, 1963
Validity of Tenancy Agreements under Rent Control Acts: Insights from Udhoo Dass v. Prem Prakash Introduction The case of Udhoo Dass v. Prem Prakash adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Limitations on District Judges' Jurisdiction in Land Acquisition References: Insights from State Of Uttar Pradesh v. Abdul Karim

Limitations on District Judges' Jurisdiction in Land Acquisition References: Insights from State Of Uttar Pradesh v. Abdul Karim

Date: Feb 6, 1963
Limitations on District Judges' Jurisdiction in Land Acquisition References: Insights from State Of Uttar Pradesh v. Abdul Karim Introduction The case of State Of Uttar Pradesh Through The Collector...
Resumption of Property Under Sanad and the Limits of Writ Jurisdiction: An Analysis of Laxmi Narain v. State of U.P.

Resumption of Property Under Sanad and the Limits of Writ Jurisdiction: An Analysis of Laxmi Narain v. State of U.P.

Date: Jan 3, 1963
Resumption of Property Under Sanad and the Limits of Writ Jurisdiction: An Analysis of Laxmi Narain v. State of U.P. Introduction The case of Laxmi Narain And Others v. State Of U.P And Others...
Impact of Zamindari Abolition on Party Impleadment under U.P Tenancy Act: Shitladin v. Board of Revenue

Impact of Zamindari Abolition on Party Impleadment under U.P Tenancy Act: Shitladin v. Board of Revenue

Date: Dec 21, 1962
Impact of Zamindari Abolition on Party Impleadment under U.P Tenancy Act: Shitladin v. Board of Revenue Introduction The case of Shitladin And Others v. Board Of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad And...
Strict Jurisdictional Interpretation of Sec. 136 CPC and Proviso to Rule 90 Underlined in Haji Rahim Bux v. Haji Sanaullah

Strict Jurisdictional Interpretation of Sec. 136 CPC and Proviso to Rule 90 Underlined in Haji Rahim Bux v. Haji Sanaullah

Date: Dec 19, 1962
Strict Jurisdictional Interpretation of Sec. 136 CPC and Proviso to Rule 90 Underlined in Haji Rahim Bux And Others v. Haji Sanaullah And Sons Introduction The case of Haji Rahim Bux And Others v....
Clarifying the Definition of 'Books' under Section 4 of the U.P Sales Tax Act: Insights from Industrial And Commercial Service v. Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P.

Clarifying the Definition of 'Books' under Section 4 of the U.P Sales Tax Act: Insights from Industrial And Commercial Service v. Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P.

Date: Dec 15, 1962
Clarifying the Definition of 'Books' under Section 4 of the U.P Sales Tax Act: Insights from Industrial And Commercial Service, Allahabad v. Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P Introduction The case of...
Retrospective Application of Eviction Protection under Section 15 of the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947: Shyaam Sunder Lal v. Shagun Chand

Retrospective Application of Eviction Protection under Section 15 of the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947: Shyaam Sunder Lal v. Shagun Chand

Date: Nov 9, 1962
Retrospective Application of Eviction Protection under Section 15 of the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 Shyaam Sunder Lal v. Shagun Chand Court: Allahabad High Court Date:...
Crushing and Sieving of Tobacco Classified as Manufacturing Process under U.P Sales Tax Act

Crushing and Sieving of Tobacco Classified as Manufacturing Process under U.P Sales Tax Act

Date: Nov 2, 1962
Crushing and Sieving of Tobacco Classified as Manufacturing Process under U.P Sales Tax Act Introduction The case of Badri Prasad Prabha Shanker and Another v. Sales Tax Commissioner, U.P, Lucknow...
Tika Ram And Sons v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Clarifying Creditor Status in Liquidation

Tika Ram And Sons v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Clarifying Creditor Status in Liquidation

Date: Oct 25, 1962
Tika Ram And Sons v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Clarifying Creditor Status in Liquidation Introduction The case of Tika Ram And Sons (Private) Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P, And Another...
Clarification on Court-Fees Application in Succession Appeals: Panzy Fernandas v. M.F. Queoros

Clarification on Court-Fees Application in Succession Appeals: Panzy Fernandas v. M.F. Queoros

Date: Oct 13, 1962
Clarification on Court-Fees Application in Succession Appeals: Panzy Fernandas v. M.F. Queoros Introduction The case of Panzy Fernandas v. M.F. Queoros adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Allahabad High Court Upholds Applicability of Section 10(2)(vii) on Sale of Business Assets

Allahabad High Court Upholds Applicability of Section 10(2)(vii) on Sale of Business Assets

Date: Sep 18, 1962
Allahabad High Court Upholds Applicability of Section 10(2)(vii) on Sale of Business Assets Introduction The case of Niranjan Lal Ram Chandra v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Lucknow was adjudicated by...
Enhancement of Hindu Widow's Property Rights under Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Shakuntala Devi v. Beni Madhav

Enhancement of Hindu Widow's Property Rights under Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Shakuntala Devi v. Beni Madhav

Date: Sep 6, 1962
Enhancement of Hindu Widow's Property Rights under Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Shakuntala Devi v. Beni Madhav Introduction Shakuntala Devi v. Beni Madhav is a...
Allahabad High Court Clarifies Permit Cancellation and Transfer under the Motor Vehicles Act

Allahabad High Court Clarifies Permit Cancellation and Transfer under the Motor Vehicles Act

Date: Aug 29, 1962
Allahabad High Court Clarifies Permit Cancellation and Transfer under the Motor Vehicles Act Introduction The case of Khalil-Ul-Rahman Khan v. State Transport Appellate Tribunal And Others...
Allahabad High Court Establishes Principles on Limitation Periods in Liquidation Proceedings and Validity of Managerial Appointments in J.A Dixit v. Official Liquidator

Allahabad High Court Establishes Principles on Limitation Periods in Liquidation Proceedings and Validity of Managerial Appointments in J.A Dixit v. Official Liquidator

Date: Aug 25, 1962
Allahabad High Court Establishes Principles on Limitation Periods in Liquidation Proceedings and Validity of Managerial Appointments in J.A Dixit v. Official Liquidator Introduction The landmark...
Inherent Powers of Appellate Courts on Raising Legal Issues in Second Appeals: Maharaj Singh v. Hukum Singh

Inherent Powers of Appellate Courts on Raising Legal Issues in Second Appeals: Maharaj Singh v. Hukum Singh

Date: Aug 21, 1962
Inherent Powers of Appellate Courts on Raising Legal Issues in Second Appeals: Maharaj Singh v. Hukum Singh Introduction The case of Maharaj Singh And Others v. Hukum Singh adjudicated by the...
Ram Prakash Ghai v. Karam Chand: Affirming Transferee Landlords' Rights to Recover Arrears under U.P. Rent Act

Ram Prakash Ghai v. Karam Chand: Affirming Transferee Landlords' Rights to Recover Arrears under U.P. Rent Act

Date: Aug 4, 1962
Ram Prakash Ghai v. Karam Chand: Affirming Transferee Landlords' Rights to Recover Arrears under U.P. Rent Act Introduction The case of Ram Prakash Ghai v. Karam Chand And Another adjudicated by the...
Validity of Arbitrator Appointment and Judicial Authority in Arbitration: Om Prakash v. Union Of India

Validity of Arbitrator Appointment and Judicial Authority in Arbitration: Om Prakash v. Union Of India

Date: Jul 31, 1962
Validity of Arbitrator Appointment and Judicial Authority in Arbitration: Om Prakash v. Union Of India Introduction The case of Om Prakash v. Union Of India adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Upholding Section 34(3) Proviso in Individual Reassessment: Lakshman Prakash v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Upholding Section 34(3) Proviso in Individual Reassessment: Lakshman Prakash v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Jul 28, 1962
Upholding Section 34(3) Proviso in Individual Reassessment: Lakshman Prakash v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Lakshman Prakash v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Uttar Pradesh...
Prem Nath L. Ganesh Dass v. Prem Nath L. Ram Nath: Arbitration in Execution Proceedings

Prem Nath L. Ganesh Dass v. Prem Nath L. Ram Nath: Arbitration in Execution Proceedings

Date: Jul 17, 1962
Prem Nath L. Ganesh Dass v. Prem Nath L. Ram Nath: Arbitration in Execution Proceedings Introduction The case of Prem Nath L. Ganesh Dass v. Prem Nath L. Ram Nath was adjudicated by the Allahabad...
Undisclosed Income from Business: Analysis of Devi Prasad Vishwanath Prasad v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Undisclosed Income from Business: Analysis of Devi Prasad Vishwanath Prasad v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Jul 12, 1962
Undisclosed Income from Business: Analysis of Devi Prasad Vishwanath Prasad v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Devi Prasad Vishwanath Prasad v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Uttar...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert