Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Kedarnath v. State: Establishing Standards for Criminal Breach of Trust Through Managerial Accountability

Kedarnath v. State: Establishing Standards for Criminal Breach of Trust Through Managerial Accountability

Date: Aug 21, 1964
Kedarnath v. State: Establishing Standards for Criminal Breach of Trust Through Managerial Accountability Introduction The case of Kedarnath v. State decided by the Allahabad High Court on August 20,...
Compulsory Retirement Does Not Constitute Removal Under Article 311: Abdul Ahad v. Inspector General Of Police

Compulsory Retirement Does Not Constitute Removal Under Article 311: Abdul Ahad v. Inspector General Of Police

Date: Aug 5, 1964
Compulsory Retirement Does Not Constitute Removal Under Article 311: Abdul Ahad v. Inspector General Of Police Introduction The case of Abdul Ahad v. Inspector General Of Police, U.P, Lucknow And...
Admissibility of Police Case Diaries in Civil Litigation: Insights from Sri Sidh Mahabirji Birajman Mandir v. Prem Narain Shukla

Admissibility of Police Case Diaries in Civil Litigation: Insights from Sri Sidh Mahabirji Birajman Mandir v. Prem Narain Shukla

Date: Jul 29, 1964
Admissibility of Police Case Diaries in Civil Litigation: Insights from Sri Sidh Mahabirji Birajman Mandir v. Prem Narain Shukla Introduction The case of Sri Sidh Mahabirji Birajman Mandir 41/1...
Single Petition Limitation for Multiple Assessment Orders: Insights from Khurjawala Buckles Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner of Sales Tax

Single Petition Limitation for Multiple Assessment Orders: Insights from Khurjawala Buckles Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner of Sales Tax

Date: Jul 28, 1964
Single Petition Limitation for Multiple Assessment Orders: Insights from Khurjawala Buckles Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner of Sales Tax Introduction The case of Khurjawala Buckles Manufacturing...
Establishing the Validity of Subsequent Transfer under Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Jagat Narain v. Laljee

Establishing the Validity of Subsequent Transfer under Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Jagat Narain v. Laljee

Date: Jul 23, 1964
Establishing the Validity of Subsequent Transfer under Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Jagat Narain v. Laljee Introduction The case of Jagat Narain v. Laljee,...
Narrow Interpretation of 'Used in Manufacture' under Central Sales Tax Act: J.K Cotton Spinning v. STO

Narrow Interpretation of 'Used in Manufacture' under Central Sales Tax Act: J.K Cotton Spinning v. STO

Date: Apr 28, 1964
Narrow Interpretation of 'Used in Manufacture' under Central Sales Tax Act: J.K Cotton Spinning & Weaving Mills Company Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer, Sector II, Kanpur, And Another Introduction The case...
Clarifying Taxation on Business Transfer to Private Limited Company: R.B Lachman Das Mohanlal & Sons v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Clarifying Taxation on Business Transfer to Private Limited Company: R.B Lachman Das Mohanlal & Sons v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Apr 9, 1964
Clarifying Taxation on Business Transfer to Private Limited Company: R.B Lachman Das Mohanlal & Sons v. Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction The case of R.B Lachman Das Mohanlal & Sons v....
Limiting Abuse of Search and Seizure Powers under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act: Seth Brothers v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Limiting Abuse of Search and Seizure Powers under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act: Seth Brothers v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Mar 28, 1964
Limiting Abuse of Search and Seizure Powers under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act Seth Brothers v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, U. P., And Others Court: Allahabad High Court Date: March 27, 1964...
Redefining 'Business' for Sales Tax Liability: Insights from Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer

Redefining 'Business' for Sales Tax Liability: Insights from Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer

Date: Mar 26, 1964
Redefining 'Business' for Sales Tax Liability: Insights from Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer Introduction The case of Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer And...
Defining Manufacturer Liability in Excise Duty: Insights from Ganga Dhar Ram Chandra vs. Collector, Central Excise, U.P.

Defining Manufacturer Liability in Excise Duty: Insights from Ganga Dhar Ram Chandra vs. Collector, Central Excise, U.P.

Date: Mar 26, 1964
Defining Manufacturer Liability in Excise Duty: Insights from Ganga Dhar Ram Chandra vs. Collector, Central Excise, U.P. Introduction The case of Ganga Dhar Ram Chandra, Belanganj, Agra v. Collector,...
Allahabad High Court Upholds the Mandatory Nature of Rule 6 under the U.P. Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947

Allahabad High Court Upholds the Mandatory Nature of Rule 6 under the U.P. Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947

Date: Mar 7, 1964
Allahabad High Court Upholds the Mandatory Nature of Rule 6 under the U.P. Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 Introduction In the landmark case of Ram Surat Singh v. Rent Control And Eviction...
Kishan Chand vs. Ram Babu: Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Agriculturists' Relief

Kishan Chand vs. Ram Babu: Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Agriculturists' Relief

Date: Feb 26, 1964
Kishan Chand vs. Ram Babu: Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Agriculturists' Relief Introduction The case of Kishan Chand Defdt. v. Ram Babu Plff.-. adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Reaffirming Psychological Cruelty in Matrimonial Law: Kusum Lata v. Kampta Prasad

Reaffirming Psychological Cruelty in Matrimonial Law: Kusum Lata v. Kampta Prasad

Date: Feb 13, 1964
Reaffirming Psychological Cruelty in Matrimonial Law: Kusum Lata v. Kampta Prasad Introduction Kusum Lata v. Kampta Prasad is a landmark judgment delivered by the Allahabad High Court on February 12,...
Doctrine of Alternative Remedies in Tax Assessment: Babu Ram Ashok Kumar v. Antarim Zila Parishad

Doctrine of Alternative Remedies in Tax Assessment: Babu Ram Ashok Kumar v. Antarim Zila Parishad

Date: Feb 4, 1964
Doctrine of Alternative Remedies in Tax Assessment: Babu Ram Ashok Kumar v. Antarim Zila Parishad 1. Introduction The case of Babu Ram Ashok Kumar And Another Petitioner vs. Antarim Zila Parishad was...
Subordinate Authority Under the Consolidation of Holdings Act: Insights from Ram Narain v. Director of Consolidation

Subordinate Authority Under the Consolidation of Holdings Act: Insights from Ram Narain v. Director of Consolidation

Date: Feb 3, 1964
Subordinate Authority Under the Consolidation of Holdings Act: Insights from Ram Narain v. Director of Consolidation Introduction The case of Ram Narain And Others v. Director Of Consolidation,...
Recognition of Adhivasi Rights Despite Prior Surrender: Jhamman Lal v. Deputy Custodian General

Recognition of Adhivasi Rights Despite Prior Surrender: Jhamman Lal v. Deputy Custodian General

Date: Jan 31, 1964
Recognition of Adhivasi Rights Despite Prior Surrender: Jhamman Lal v. Deputy Custodian General Introduction The case of Jhamman Lal and Others v. Deputy Custodian General and Others adjudicated by...
Interest on Minor's Capital in Partnership: A Landmark Judgment

Interest on Minor's Capital in Partnership: A Landmark Judgment

Date: Dec 19, 1963
Interest on Minor's Capital in Partnership: A Landmark Judgment Introduction The case of L. Ram Narain Garg v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on December 18,...
Mandatory Compliance with Constitutional Oath Forms for High Court Judges: Shabbir v. State

Mandatory Compliance with Constitutional Oath Forms for High Court Judges: Shabbir v. State

Date: Dec 7, 1963
Mandatory Compliance with Constitutional Oath Forms for High Court Judges: Shabbir v. State Introduction The case of Shabbir v. State adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on December 6, 1963,...
Transferability of Bhumidhar Rights by Female Holders: Insights from Ramji Dixit v. Bhrigunath

Transferability of Bhumidhar Rights by Female Holders: Insights from Ramji Dixit v. Bhrigunath

Date: Nov 30, 1963
Transferability of Bhumidhar Rights by Female Holders: Insights from Ramji Dixit v. Bhrigunath Introduction The case of Ramji Dixit v. Bhrigunath, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on November...
Akhtar v. State: Establishing the Boundaries of Grave and Sudden Provocation Under Section 300 IPC

Akhtar v. State: Establishing the Boundaries of Grave and Sudden Provocation Under Section 300 IPC

Date: Nov 12, 1963
Akhtar v. State: Establishing the Boundaries of Grave and Sudden Provocation Under Section 300 IPC Introduction Akhtar v. State, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on November 11, 1963, is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert