Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Constitutionality of Section 144 Cr. P.C. Upheld in Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of U.P.

Constitutionality of Section 144 Cr. P.C. Upheld in Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of U.P.

Date: Mar 16, 1967
Constitutionality of Section 144 Cr. P.C. Upheld in Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of U.P. 1. Introduction The case of Ram Manohar Lohia And Others v. State Of U.P And Others presented before the...
Non-Deductibility of Service Agreements Not Constituting Sub-Partnerships: Pt. Sheo Nath Prasad Sharma v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Non-Deductibility of Service Agreements Not Constituting Sub-Partnerships: Pt. Sheo Nath Prasad Sharma v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Feb 25, 1967
Non-Deductibility of Service Agreements Not Constituting Sub-Partnerships: Pt. Sheo Nath Prasad Sharma v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Pt. Sheo Nath Prasad Sharma v....
Determination of Stock-in-Trade vs. Capital Investment: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Lucknow v. Rameshwar Prasad Bagla

Determination of Stock-in-Trade vs. Capital Investment: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Lucknow v. Rameshwar Prasad Bagla

Date: Feb 21, 1967
Determination of Stock-in-Trade vs. Capital Investment: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Lucknow v. Rameshwar Prasad Bagla Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Lucknow v....
Farzand v. Mohan Singh: Affirming Constitutionality of U.P. Civil Service Judicial Appointments and Rule-Making Procedure

Farzand v. Mohan Singh: Affirming Constitutionality of U.P. Civil Service Judicial Appointments and Rule-Making Procedure

Date: Feb 21, 1967
Farzand v. Mohan Singh: Affirming Constitutionality of U.P. Civil Service Judicial Appointments and Rule-Making Procedure Introduction Farzand v. Mohan Singh And Others Opposite Parties is a landmark...
Exemption of Arbitration Fees for High Court Judges: B. Malick v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Exemption of Arbitration Fees for High Court Judges: B. Malick v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Jan 21, 1967
Exemption of Arbitration Fees for High Court Judges: B. Malick v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of B. Malick v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Uttar Pradesh pronounced by the...
Development Rebate Eligibility for Hired-Out Plant and Machinery: Ajodhya Prasad Tara Chand Khekra v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Development Rebate Eligibility for Hired-Out Plant and Machinery: Ajodhya Prasad Tara Chand Khekra v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Jan 21, 1967
Development Rebate Eligibility for Hired-Out Plant and Machinery: Ajodhya Prasad Tara Chand Khekra v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Ajodhya Prasad Tara Chand Khekra v....
Firm Chuni Lal Tukki Mal v. Firm Mukat Lal Ram Chandra: New Precedent on Promissory Note vs. Acknowledgment of Liability

Firm Chuni Lal Tukki Mal v. Firm Mukat Lal Ram Chandra: New Precedent on Promissory Note vs. Acknowledgment of Liability

Date: Jan 20, 1967
Firm Chuni Lal Tukki Mal v. Firm Mukat Lal Ram Chandra: New Precedent on Promissory Note vs. Acknowledgment of Liability Introduction The case of Firm Chuni Lal Tukki Mal v. Firm Mukat Lal Ram...
Mistra Nand Kaushik v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another: Supreme Ruling on Toll Levy Interpretation

Mistra Nand Kaushik v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another: Supreme Ruling on Toll Levy Interpretation

Date: Jan 6, 1967
Mistra Nand Kaushik v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another: Supreme Ruling on Toll Levy Interpretation Introduction The case of Mistra Nand Kaushik v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another revolves...
Shiv Prasad Gupta Agarwala v. S.M. Sabir Zaidi: Establishing the Principle of Reasonable Expectation of Earnings in Fatal Accidents

Shiv Prasad Gupta Agarwala v. S.M. Sabir Zaidi: Establishing the Principle of Reasonable Expectation of Earnings in Fatal Accidents

Date: Dec 8, 1966
Shiv Prasad Gupta Agarwala v. S.M. Sabir Zaidi: Establishing the Principle of Reasonable Expectation of Earnings in Fatal Accidents Introduction The case of Shiv Prasad Gupta Agarwala v. S.M. Sabir...
Due Process in Removal of Municipal Board Members: Insights from Abdul Latif Nomani v. Commissioner

Due Process in Removal of Municipal Board Members: Insights from Abdul Latif Nomani v. Commissioner

Date: Dec 6, 1966
Due Process in Removal of Municipal Board Members: Insights from Abdul Latif Nomani v. Commissioner Introduction The case of Abdul Latif Nomani v. Commissioner, Gorakhpur And Others, adjudicated by...
Succession and Property Classification under the Hindu Succession Act: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P v. Ram Rakshpal, Ashok Kumar

Succession and Property Classification under the Hindu Succession Act: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P v. Ram Rakshpal, Ashok Kumar

Date: Nov 10, 1966
Succession and Property Classification under the Hindu Succession Act: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P v. Ram Rakshpal, Ashok Kumar Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax,...
Allahabad High Court Upholds Validity of Partnership Deed Under Section 26A: A Comprehensive Commentary on M/S. Hiralal Jagannath Prasad v. Commissioner Of Income Tax U.P Lucknow

Allahabad High Court Upholds Validity of Partnership Deed Under Section 26A: A Comprehensive Commentary on M/S. Hiralal Jagannath Prasad v. Commissioner Of Income Tax U.P Lucknow

Date: Nov 2, 1966
Allahabad High Court Upholds Validity of Partnership Deed Under Section 26A: A Comprehensive Commentary on M/S. Hiralal Jagannath Prasad v. Commissioner Of Income Tax U.P Lucknow Introduction The...
Clarifying 'Reason to Believe' Under Section 34(1)(a) of the Indian Income Tax Act: Hemlata Agarwal v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Clarifying 'Reason to Believe' Under Section 34(1)(a) of the Indian Income Tax Act: Hemlata Agarwal v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Oct 15, 1966
Clarifying 'Reason to Believe' Under Section 34(1)(a) of the Indian Income Tax Act: Hemlata Agarwal v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Hemlata Agarwal v. Commissioner Of...
Actual Realization as Basis for Agricultural Income and Exclusion of Nursery Income: Insights from Maharaja Vibhuti Narain Singh v. State Of Uttar Pradesh

Actual Realization as Basis for Agricultural Income and Exclusion of Nursery Income: Insights from Maharaja Vibhuti Narain Singh v. State Of Uttar Pradesh

Date: Oct 11, 1966
Actual Realization as Basis for Agricultural Income and Exclusion of Nursery Income: Insights from Maharaja Vibhuti Narain Singh v. State Of Uttar Pradesh Introduction The case of Maharaja Vibhuti...
Allahabad High Court Renders Landmark Judgment on Notary Removal and Constitutional Protections

Allahabad High Court Renders Landmark Judgment on Notary Removal and Constitutional Protections

Date: Sep 7, 1966
Allahabad High Court Renders Landmark Judgment on Notary Removal and Constitutional Protections 1. Introduction The case of Kashi Prasad Saksena, Advocate, Ganga Prasad Road, Lucknow v. State Of...
Affirming Section 34(1)(a): Comprehensive Disclosure Obligations in Income Tax Assessments - Mithoo Lal Tek Chand v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Affirming Section 34(1)(a): Comprehensive Disclosure Obligations in Income Tax Assessments - Mithoo Lal Tek Chand v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Aug 26, 1966
Affirming Section 34(1)(a): Comprehensive Disclosure Obligations in Income Tax Assessments Introduction The case of Mithoo Lal Tek Chand v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P adjudicated by the...
Allahabad High Court Establishes Jurisdictional Limits in Section 34 Assessments

Allahabad High Court Establishes Jurisdictional Limits in Section 34 Assessments

Date: Aug 23, 1966
Allahabad High Court Establishes Jurisdictional Limits in Section 34 Assessments Introduction The case of Raghubar Dayal Ram Kishan v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P adjudicated by the Allahabad...
Mewa v. Baldeo: Clarifying Jurisdiction under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act

Mewa v. Baldeo: Clarifying Jurisdiction under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act

Date: Aug 13, 1966
Mewa v. Baldeo: Clarifying Jurisdiction under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act Introduction In the landmark case of Mewa v. Baldeo (1966), the Allahabad High Court addressed a...
Attachment Before Judgment: Validity and Procedural Compliance in Krishna Gupta v. Ram Babu

Attachment Before Judgment: Validity and Procedural Compliance in Krishna Gupta v. Ram Babu

Date: Aug 2, 1966
Attachment Before Judgment: Validity and Procedural Compliance in Krishna Gupta v. Ram Babu Introduction The case of Krishna Gupta v. Ram Babu adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on August 1,...
No Binding Acknowledgment Without Explicit Authority: Insights from Lakshmi Ratan Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. Aluminium Corporation Of India Ltd.

No Binding Acknowledgment Without Explicit Authority: Insights from Lakshmi Ratan Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. Aluminium Corporation Of India Ltd.

Date: May 20, 1966
No Binding Acknowledgment Without Explicit Authority: Insights from Lakshmi Ratan Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. Aluminium Corporation Of India Ltd. Introduction The case of Lakshmi Ratan Cotton Mills Co....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert