Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Recognition of Third-Party Claims in Ceiling Land Determinations under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Holdings Act

Recognition of Third-Party Claims in Ceiling Land Determinations under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Holdings Act

Date: Mar 13, 1969
Recognition of Third-Party Claims in Ceiling Land Determinations under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Holdings Act Introduction In the landmark case of Upper Ganges Sugar Mills Ltd. v....
Service of Notice to Single Co-Tenant Valid for Termination of Tenancy: Vishnawati v. Chowdhry

Service of Notice to Single Co-Tenant Valid for Termination of Tenancy: Vishnawati v. Chowdhry

Date: Feb 27, 1969
Service of Notice to Single Co-Tenant Valid for Termination of Tenancy: Vishnawati v. Chowdhry Introduction The case of Vishnawati v. Bhagwat Vithu Chowdhry adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Regulated Sales under Levy Orders Recognized as Taxable Sales in U.P

Regulated Sales under Levy Orders Recognized as Taxable Sales in U.P

Date: Feb 27, 1969
Regulated Sales under Levy Orders Recognized as Taxable Sales in U.P Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P Lucknow v. Ram Bilas Ram Gopal, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Allahabad High Court Holds Partnership Firm Owns Property for Tax Purposes in Ram Narain And Brothers v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Allahabad High Court Holds Partnership Firm Owns Property for Tax Purposes in Ram Narain And Brothers v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Feb 21, 1969
Allahabad High Court Holds Partnership Firm Owns Property for Tax Purposes in Ram Narain And Brothers v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Ram Narain and Brothers v. Commissioner Of...
Interpretation of 'Chemical' in Sales Tax Law: The Precedent Set by Commissioner, Sales Tax, U.P. Lucknow v. Prayag Chemical Works

Interpretation of 'Chemical' in Sales Tax Law: The Precedent Set by Commissioner, Sales Tax, U.P. Lucknow v. Prayag Chemical Works

Date: Feb 21, 1969
Interpretation of 'Chemical' in Sales Tax Law: The Precedent Set by Commissioner, Sales Tax, U.P. Lucknow v. Prayag Chemical Works 1. Introduction The case of Commissioner, Sales Tax, U.P. Lucknow v....
Limits of Writ Jurisdiction in Telecommunications Service Disputes: Insights from Raghubar Dayal Kanodia v. Union of India

Limits of Writ Jurisdiction in Telecommunications Service Disputes: Insights from Raghubar Dayal Kanodia v. Union of India

Date: Jan 11, 1969
Limits of Writ Jurisdiction in Telecommunications Service Disputes: Insights from Raghubar Dayal Kanodia v. Union of India Introduction The case of Raghubar Dayal Kanodia v. Union Of India And Others...
Affirmation of High Court's Inherent Powers under Section 561-A CPC: Necessity of Inclusion of All Necessary Parties in Criminal Revisions

Affirmation of High Court's Inherent Powers under Section 561-A CPC: Necessity of Inclusion of All Necessary Parties in Criminal Revisions

Date: Dec 19, 1968
Affirmation of High Court's Inherent Powers under Section 561-A CPC: Necessity of Inclusion of All Necessary Parties in Criminal Revisions Introduction The case of Chitawan v. Mahboob Ilahi,...
Clarification on Applicability of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 to Agricultural Land Tenures: Prema Devi v. Joint Director of Consolidation

Clarification on Applicability of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 to Agricultural Land Tenures: Prema Devi v. Joint Director of Consolidation

Date: Dec 14, 1968
Clarification on Applicability of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 to Agricultural Land Tenures: Prema Devi v. Joint Director of Consolidation Introduction The case of Prema Devi v. Joint Director Of...
Interpretation of "Glasswares" in Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act: The Banaras Bead Case

Interpretation of "Glasswares" in Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act: The Banaras Bead Case

Date: Dec 11, 1968
Interpretation of "Glasswares" in Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act: The Banaras Bead Case Introduction The case of Commissioner, Sales Tax, U.P, Lucknow v. Banaras Bead Manufacturing Co., Varanasi...
Exception to Time-Bar in Payment of Wages Claims: Ram Kishore Sharma v. Additional District Judge, Saharanpur

Exception to Time-Bar in Payment of Wages Claims: Ram Kishore Sharma v. Additional District Judge, Saharanpur

Date: Dec 11, 1968
Exception to Time-Bar in Payment of Wages Claims: Ram Kishore Sharma v. Additional District Judge, Saharanpur Introduction The case of Ram Kishore Sharma v. Additional District Judge, Saharanpur...
Clarification on Depreciation Allowance and Loss Set-Off: Raza Sugar Co. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Clarification on Depreciation Allowance and Loss Set-Off: Raza Sugar Co. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Dec 6, 1968
Clarification on Depreciation Allowance and Loss Set-Off: Raza Sugar Co. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of Raza Sugar Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax was adjudicated by...
Power of Election Tribunals to Dismiss Election Petitions for Default of Appearance: Duryodhan v. Sita Ram

Power of Election Tribunals to Dismiss Election Petitions for Default of Appearance: Duryodhan v. Sita Ram

Date: Nov 20, 1968
Power of Election Tribunals to Dismiss Election Petitions for Default of Appearance Duryodhan v. Sita Ram and Others, Allahabad High Court, 1968 Introduction The case of Duryodhan v. Sita Ram and...
Restoration Applications under Order IX Despite Proceedings under Order XVII, Rule 3 – Munna Lal v. Jai Prakash

Restoration Applications under Order IX Despite Proceedings under Order XVII, Rule 3 – Munna Lal v. Jai Prakash

Date: Nov 19, 1968
Restoration Applications under Order IX Despite Proceedings under Order XVII, Rule 3 – Munna Lal v. Jai Prakash (1968) Introduction Munna Lal v. Jai Prakash, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court...
Validity of Tax Notices and Case Transfers Under Income-Tax Act: Insights from Sidh Gopal Gajanand v. Income-Tax Officer

Validity of Tax Notices and Case Transfers Under Income-Tax Act: Insights from Sidh Gopal Gajanand v. Income-Tax Officer

Date: Nov 6, 1968
Validity of Tax Notices and Case Transfers Under Income-Tax Act: Insights from Sidh Gopal Gajanand v. Income-Tax Officer Introduction The case of Sidh Gopal Gajanand And Others v. Income-Tax Officer,...
Full Allowance of Litigation Expenses for Share Protection under Section 12(2): J.K Commercial Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P.

Full Allowance of Litigation Expenses for Share Protection under Section 12(2): J.K Commercial Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P.

Date: Oct 25, 1968
Full Allowance of Litigation Expenses for Share Protection under Section 12(2) J.K Commercial Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P. (1968) Introduction The case of J.K Commercial...
Reaffirmation and Clarification of General Exception Burden of Proof: Rishi Kesh Singh And Others v. State, 1968

Reaffirmation and Clarification of General Exception Burden of Proof: Rishi Kesh Singh And Others v. State, 1968

Date: Oct 19, 1968
Reaffirmation and Clarification of General Exception Burden of Proof: Rishi Kesh Singh And Others v. State, 1968 Introduction The case of Rishi Kesh Singh And Others v. State heard by the Allahabad...
Notice Requirements in Applications Under Section 391 of the Companies Act: Hind Auto Indo Ltd. v. Premier Moto (P) Ltd.

Notice Requirements in Applications Under Section 391 of the Companies Act: Hind Auto Indo Ltd. v. Premier Moto (P) Ltd.

Date: Oct 16, 1968
Notice Requirements in Applications Under Section 391 of the Companies Act: Hind Auto Indo Ltd. v. Premier Moto (P) Ltd. 1. Introduction The case of Hind Auto Indo Ltd. v. Premier Moto (P) Ltd....
Authority to Refer Taxation Questions to Larger Benches: Insights from Dharmendra Prasad Singh v. State Of Uttar Pradesh

Authority to Refer Taxation Questions to Larger Benches: Insights from Dharmendra Prasad Singh v. State Of Uttar Pradesh

Date: Oct 12, 1968
Authority to Refer Taxation Questions to Larger Benches: Insights from Dharmendra Prasad Singh v. State Of Uttar Pradesh Introduction The case of Dharmendra Prasad Singh v. State Of Uttar Pradesh...
Res Judicata in Consolidated Suits: Insights from Jai Narain Har Narain v. Bulaqi Das

Res Judicata in Consolidated Suits: Insights from Jai Narain Har Narain v. Bulaqi Das

Date: Sep 24, 1968
Res Judicata in Consolidated Suits: Insights from Jai Narain Har Narain v. Bulaqi Das Introduction The case of Jai Narain Har Narain v. Bulaqi Das, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Ram Awalamb v. Jata Shankar: Clarifying Bhumidhari Rights and Jurisdiction of Courts in Land Matters

Ram Awalamb v. Jata Shankar: Clarifying Bhumidhari Rights and Jurisdiction of Courts in Land Matters

Date: Sep 19, 1968
Ram Awalamb v. Jata Shankar: Clarifying Bhumidhari Rights and Jurisdiction of Courts in Land Matters Introduction The case of Ram Awalamb v. Jata Shankar adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert