Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Accrual of Liability in Income Tax Law: Insights from Swadeshi Cotton Mill Co. Ltd. v. CIT, Kanpur

Accrual of Liability in Income Tax Law: Insights from Swadeshi Cotton Mill Co. Ltd. v. CIT, Kanpur

Date: Sep 28, 1979
Accrual of Liability in Income Tax Law: Insights from Swadeshi Cotton Mill Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Kanpur Introduction The case of Swadeshi Cotton Mill Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of...
Interpretation of Section 73A in Estate Duty Proceedings: Padampat Singhania Case

Interpretation of Section 73A in Estate Duty Proceedings: Padampat Singhania Case

Date: Sep 27, 1979
Interpretation of Section 73A in Estate Duty Proceedings: Padampat Singhania Case Introduction The case of Padampat Singhania And Others v. Controller Of Estate Duty, Kanpur adjudicated by the...
Preservation of Vested Rights in Appeals: Pratap Narain Agarwal v. Ram Narain Agarwal And Others

Preservation of Vested Rights in Appeals: Pratap Narain Agarwal v. Ram Narain Agarwal And Others

Date: Sep 21, 1979
Preservation of Vested Rights in Appeals: Pratap Narain Agarwal v. Ram Narain Agarwal And Others Introduction The case of Pratap Narain Agarwal v. Ram Narain Agarwal And Others delivered by the...
Mohd. Umar Khan v. Idris Mohd. Ghani And Others: Jurisdictional Clarity Between Civil and Revenue Courts

Mohd. Umar Khan v. Idris Mohd. Ghani And Others: Jurisdictional Clarity Between Civil and Revenue Courts

Date: Sep 13, 1979
Mohd. Umar Khan v. Idris Mohd. Ghani And Others: Jurisdictional Clarity Between Civil and Revenue Courts Introduction Mohd. Umar Khan v. Idris Mohd. Ghani And Others is a landmark judgment delivered...
Recognition of Hindu Undivided Family Status upon Marriage: Prem Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Recognition of Hindu Undivided Family Status upon Marriage: Prem Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Sep 7, 1979
Recognition of Hindu Undivided Family Status upon Marriage: Prem Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Prem Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax was adjudicated by the Allahabad...
Judgment in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Modi Spinning Mills: Key Rulings on Entertainment Expenses, New Undertaking Exemption, Capital Computation, and Fair Rent Assessment

Judgment in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Modi Spinning Mills: Key Rulings on Entertainment Expenses, New Undertaking Exemption, Capital Computation, and Fair Rent Assessment

Date: Sep 6, 1979
Judgment in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Modi Spinning Mills: Key Rulings on Entertainment Expenses, New Undertaking Exemption, Capital Computation, and Fair Rent Assessment Introduction The case of...
Non-Taxability of Goodwill Share upon Partner Retirement under Section 47(ii)

Non-Taxability of Goodwill Share upon Partner Retirement under Section 47(ii)

Date: Sep 6, 1979
Non-Taxability of Goodwill Share upon Partner Retirement under Section 47(ii) Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Lucknow v. Madan Lal Bhargava adjudicated by the Allahabad High...
Valid Assessment Requirements in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ishwar Singh and Sons

Valid Assessment Requirements in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ishwar Singh and Sons

Date: Aug 31, 1979
Valid Assessment Requirements in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ishwar Singh and Sons Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ishwar Singh and Sons adjudicated by the Allahabad High...
Allahabad High Court Upholds Section 80J Relief for New Business Units and Clarifies Disallowance under Section 40(a)(v) in Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P v. Hind Lamps Ltd.

Allahabad High Court Upholds Section 80J Relief for New Business Units and Clarifies Disallowance under Section 40(a)(v) in Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P v. Hind Lamps Ltd.

Date: Aug 29, 1979
Allahabad High Court Upholds Section 80J Relief for New Business Units and Clarifies Disallowance under Section 40(a)(v) in Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P v. Hind Lamps Ltd. Introduction The case of...
B.N Singh v. State Of U.P And Another: Upholding Bona Fide Public Employment Practices

B.N Singh v. State Of U.P And Another: Upholding Bona Fide Public Employment Practices

Date: Aug 25, 1979
B.N Singh v. State Of U.P And Another: Upholding Bona Fide Public Employment Practices Introduction B.N Singh v. State Of U.P And Another is a landmark judgment delivered by the Allahabad High Court...
Appealability of Penal Interest under the Income Tax Act: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Geeta Ram Kali Ram

Appealability of Penal Interest under the Income Tax Act: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Geeta Ram Kali Ram

Date: Aug 24, 1979
Appealability of Penal Interest under the Income Tax Act: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Geeta Ram Kali Ram Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Geeta Ram Kali Ram was...
Raj Narain Jain v. IIrd Additional District Judge: Affirmation of Covenant Binding Successors in Landlord-Tenant Relationships under U.P Act No. 13 of 1972

Raj Narain Jain v. IIrd Additional District Judge: Affirmation of Covenant Binding Successors in Landlord-Tenant Relationships under U.P Act No. 13 of 1972

Date: Aug 19, 1979
Raj Narain Jain v. IIrd Additional District Judge: Affirmation of Covenant Binding Successors in Landlord-Tenant Relationships under U.P Act No. 13 of 1972 Introduction The case of Raj Narain Jain v....
Kallu v. State of U.P. (1979): Defining 'Irrigated Land' Under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act

Kallu v. State of U.P. (1979): Defining 'Irrigated Land' Under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act

Date: Jul 12, 1979
Kallu v. State of U.P. (1979): Defining 'Irrigated Land' Under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act Introduction Kallu v. State of U.P. is a significant judgment delivered by...
Pioneer Trading Syndicate v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Affirming Scrutiny Over Voluntary Disclosures

Pioneer Trading Syndicate v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Affirming Scrutiny Over Voluntary Disclosures

Date: Jul 5, 1979
Pioneer Trading Syndicate v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Affirming Scrutiny Over Voluntary Disclosures Introduction The case of Pioneer Trading Syndicate v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Lucknow...
Finality of Judgments Maintained Despite Admission of Review Applications

Finality of Judgments Maintained Despite Admission of Review Applications

Date: May 12, 1979
Finality of Judgments Maintained Despite Admission of Review Applications Introduction In the landmark case of Sakal Singh And Others v. Smt. Devi And Another, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court...
Clarification on Revisional Jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC: Jupiter Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd. v. Dwarka Dhiesh Dayal And Others

Clarification on Revisional Jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC: Jupiter Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd. v. Dwarka Dhiesh Dayal And Others

Date: May 4, 1979
Clarification on Revisional Jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC: Jupiter Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd. v. Dwarka Dhiesh Dayal And Others Introduction The case of Jupiter Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd. v. Dwarka Dhiesh...
Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 226: Examinations Committee’s Use of Circumstantial Evidence in Ghazanfar Rashid v. Board of High School

Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 226: Examinations Committee’s Use of Circumstantial Evidence in Ghazanfar Rashid v. Board of High School

Date: May 2, 1979
Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 226: Examinations Committee’s Use of Circumstantial Evidence in Ghazanfar Rashid v. Board of High School And Intermediate Education, U.P, Allahabad And Others...
Judicial Oversight on Counsel Responsibilities in Default Dismissal: Nawabzada Mohd. Ishaq Khan v. The Delhi Iron And Steel Co. Ltd.

Judicial Oversight on Counsel Responsibilities in Default Dismissal: Nawabzada Mohd. Ishaq Khan v. The Delhi Iron And Steel Co. Ltd.

Date: May 2, 1979
Judicial Oversight on Counsel Responsibilities in Default Dismissal: Nawabzada Mohd. Ishaq Khan v. The Delhi Iron And Steel Co. Ltd. Introduction The case of Nawabzada Mohd. Ishaq Khan v. The Delhi...
Estoppel and Void Contracts: Insights from Sheopal And Others v. Smt. Lakhpata

Estoppel and Void Contracts: Insights from Sheopal And Others v. Smt. Lakhpata

Date: Apr 20, 1979
Estoppel and Void Contracts: Insights from Sheopal And Others v. Smt. Lakhpata Introduction The case of Sheopal And Others v. Smt. Lakhpata adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court in 1979 is a...
Limitation of Insurance Company's Liability under Section 95 of the Motor Vehicles Act: Desraj v. Ram Narain (1979)

Limitation of Insurance Company's Liability under Section 95 of the Motor Vehicles Act: Desraj v. Ram Narain (1979)

Date: Apr 19, 1979
Limitation of Insurance Company's Liability under Section 95 of the Motor Vehicles Act: Desraj And Others v. Ram Narain And Others (S.) (1979) Introduction The case of Desraj And Others v. Ram Narain...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert