Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Recognition of Inter-State Scheduled Tribe Status in Reservation Policies: Sanjay Kumar Singh v. State of U.P

Recognition of Inter-State Scheduled Tribe Status in Reservation Policies: Sanjay Kumar Singh v. State of U.P

Date: Nov 27, 1999
Recognition of Inter-State Scheduled Tribe Status in Reservation Policies: Sanjay Kumar Singh v. State of U.P Introduction The case of Sanjay Kumar Singh v. State of U.P and Another was adjudicated...
Reopening of Assessments Under Section 147: Insights from S.K Gupta And Co. v. Income-Tax Officer

Reopening of Assessments Under Section 147: Insights from S.K Gupta And Co. v. Income-Tax Officer

Date: Nov 23, 1999
Reopening of Assessments Under Section 147: Insights from S.K Gupta And Co. v. Income-Tax Officer Introduction The case of S.K Gupta And Co. v. Income-Tax Officer And Another adjudicated by the...
Private Defence of Property: Comprehensive Analysis of the Allahabad High Court's Decision in State of U.P. v. Ram Dayal & Jaggu

Private Defence of Property: Comprehensive Analysis of the Allahabad High Court's Decision in State of U.P. v. Ram Dayal & Jaggu

Date: Nov 20, 1999
Private Defence of Property: Comprehensive Analysis of the Allahabad High Court's Decision in State of U.P. v. Ram Dayal & Jaggu Introduction The case of State of U.P. v. Ram Dayal & Jaggu...
Magistrate Not Required to Hear Accused Before Rejecting Final Report: Ranjeet Singh v. State of U.P.

Magistrate Not Required to Hear Accused Before Rejecting Final Report: Ranjeet Singh v. State of U.P.

Date: Nov 13, 1999
Magistrate Not Required to Hear Accused Before Rejecting Final Report: Ranjeet Singh v. State of U.P. Introduction Ranjeet Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, decided by the Allahabad High Court on...
High Court's Use of Article 227 to Prevent Abuse of Judicial Process in Geeta Pump Pvt. Ltd. v. District Judge

High Court's Use of Article 227 to Prevent Abuse of Judicial Process in Geeta Pump Pvt. Ltd. v. District Judge

Date: Oct 15, 1999
High Court's Use of Article 227 to Prevent Abuse of Judicial Process in Geeta Pump Pvt. Ltd. v. District Judge Introduction The case of Geeta Pump (Private) Limited v. District Judge, decided by the...
Determining Territorial Jurisdiction for Writ Petitions under Article 226: Insights from Sahara India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Determining Territorial Jurisdiction for Writ Petitions under Article 226: Insights from Sahara India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Oct 7, 1999
Determining Territorial Jurisdiction for Writ Petitions under Article 226: Insights from Sahara India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Sahara India Ltd. And Another v....
Expansive Scope for Amendment of Pleadings Under Order 6, Rule 17 CPC: Insights from Om Rice Mill v. Banaras State Bank Ltd.

Expansive Scope for Amendment of Pleadings Under Order 6, Rule 17 CPC: Insights from Om Rice Mill v. Banaras State Bank Ltd.

Date: Sep 28, 1999
Expansive Scope for Amendment of Pleadings Under Order 6, Rule 17 CPC: Insights from Om Rice Mill v. Banaras State Bank Ltd. Introduction The case of Om Rice Mill, Jaspur And Others v. Banaras State...
Judicial Review of Recruitment Process in Union Of India And Others v. Akchhay Kumar Singh And Others

Judicial Review of Recruitment Process in Union Of India And Others v. Akchhay Kumar Singh And Others

Date: Sep 25, 1999
Judicial Review of Recruitment Process in Union Of India And Others v. Akchhay Kumar Singh And Others 1. Introduction Union Of India And Others v. Akchhay Kumar Singh And Others is a landmark...
Ensuring Fairness in Quashing Cognizable FIRs: Insights from Satya Pal v. State of U.P.

Ensuring Fairness in Quashing Cognizable FIRs: Insights from Satya Pal v. State of U.P.

Date: Sep 18, 1999
Ensuring Fairness in Quashing Cognizable FIRs: Insights from Satya Pal v. State of U.P. Introduction The case of Satya Pal and Others v. State of U.P and Others, adjudicated by the Allahabad High...
Establishing the Principle of Common Intention in Murder Cases: Ravindra Singh & Another v. State of U.P.

Establishing the Principle of Common Intention in Murder Cases: Ravindra Singh & Another v. State of U.P.

Date: Jul 29, 1999
Establishing the Principle of Common Intention in Murder Cases: Ravindra Singh & Another v. State of U.P. Introduction The case of Ravindra Singh and Another v. State of Uttar Pradesh adjudicated by...
Legal Commentary on Monga Metals Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax: Validation of Block Assessments and Natural Justice Considerations

Legal Commentary on Monga Metals Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax: Validation of Block Assessments and Natural Justice Considerations

Date: Jul 1, 1999
Legal Commentary on Monga Metals Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax: Validation of Block Assessments and Natural Justice Considerations Introduction The case of Monga Metals Pvt. Ltd....
Bali Ram v. State Of Uttar Pradesh: Upholding Auction Purchaser Rights in the Presence of Prior Attachments

Bali Ram v. State Of Uttar Pradesh: Upholding Auction Purchaser Rights in the Presence of Prior Attachments

Date: May 27, 1999
Bali Ram v. State Of Uttar Pradesh: Upholding Auction Purchaser Rights in the Presence of Prior Attachments Introduction Bali Ram v. State Of Uttar Pradesh and Others is a landmark judgment delivered...
Recognition of Co-operative Societies as Instruments of State under Article 226: A New Precedent

Recognition of Co-operative Societies as Instruments of State under Article 226: A New Precedent

Date: May 7, 1999
Recognition of Co-operative Societies as Instruments of State under Article 226: A New Precedent Introduction The case of Jagveer Singh v. Chairman, The Co-Operative Textile Mills Ltd., Bulandshahr...
Conformity of Show Cause Notices under U.P. Control of Goondas Act: Establishing the Necessity of Disclosing General Material Allegations

Conformity of Show Cause Notices under U.P. Control of Goondas Act: Establishing the Necessity of Disclosing General Material Allegations

Date: May 5, 1999
Conformity of Show Cause Notices under U.P. Control of Goondas Act: Establishing the Necessity of Disclosing General Material Allegations Introduction The case of Bhim Sain Tyagi v. The State Of...
Enhancing Judicial Scrutiny on Show Cause Notices: Insights from Bhilm Sain Tyagi v. State Of U.P

Enhancing Judicial Scrutiny on Show Cause Notices: Insights from Bhilm Sain Tyagi v. State Of U.P

Date: May 5, 1999
Enhancing Judicial Scrutiny on Show Cause Notices: Insights from Bhilm Sain Tyagi v. State Of U.P Introduction The case of Bhilm Sain Tyagi v. State Of U.P adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Establishing Prima Facie Case Standards in Summoning under Sections 498-A/504 IPC: Parsoon Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P. (1999)

Establishing Prima Facie Case Standards in Summoning under Sections 498-A/504 IPC: Parsoon Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P. (1999)

Date: Apr 6, 1999
Establishing Prima Facie Case Standards in Summoning under Sections 498-A/504 IPC: Parsoon Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P. (1999) Introduction The case of Parsoon Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P....
Summary Mutation Proceedings and Writ Jurisdiction: Insights from Narain Singh v. Addl. Commissioner, Meerut

Summary Mutation Proceedings and Writ Jurisdiction: Insights from Narain Singh v. Addl. Commissioner, Meerut

Date: Apr 2, 1999
Summary Mutation Proceedings and Writ Jurisdiction: Insights from Narain Singh v. Addl. Commissioner, Meerut 1. Introduction The case of Narain Singh and Another v. Additional Commissioner, Meerut...
Strict Adherence to Due Process in Removal of Panchayat Pradhan: Sandhya Gupta v. District Magistrate, Auraiya

Strict Adherence to Due Process in Removal of Panchayat Pradhan: Sandhya Gupta v. District Magistrate, Auraiya

Date: Feb 20, 1999
Strict Adherence to Due Process in Removal of Panchayat Pradhan: Sandhya Gupta v. District Magistrate, Auraiya Introduction The case of Sandhya Gupta v. District Magistrate, Auraiya revolves around...
Obligation to Maintain a Waiting List in Public Recruitment: Insights from State Of U.P And Others v. Ravindra Nath Rai And Others

Obligation to Maintain a Waiting List in Public Recruitment: Insights from State Of U.P And Others v. Ravindra Nath Rai And Others

Date: Feb 4, 1999
Obligation to Maintain a Waiting List in Public Recruitment: Insights from State Of U.P And Others v. Ravindra Nath Rai And Others Introduction The case of State Of U.P And Others v. Ravindra Nath...
Ad Hoc Appointments in Educational Services: Insights from Smt. Pratima Chauhan v. Regional Deputy Director of Education

Ad Hoc Appointments in Educational Services: Insights from Smt. Pratima Chauhan v. Regional Deputy Director of Education

Date: Feb 3, 1999
Ad Hoc Appointments in Educational Services: Insights from Smt. Pratima Chauhan v. Regional Deputy Director of Education Introduction The case of Smt. Pratima Chauhan And Another v. Regional Deputy...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert