Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Fixed Deposit Receipts Not Considered Valuable Assets under Section 271(1)(c): Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Mohan Lal Sharma

Fixed Deposit Receipts Not Considered Valuable Assets under Section 271(1)(c): Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Mohan Lal Sharma

Date: Apr 28, 2005
Fixed Deposit Receipts Not Considered Valuable Assets under Section 271(1)(c): Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Mohan Lal Sharma Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v....
Clarification on Explanation 5(2) under Section 271(1)(c): Allahabad High Court Upholds Tribunal Decision in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Radha Kishan Goel

Clarification on Explanation 5(2) under Section 271(1)(c): Allahabad High Court Upholds Tribunal Decision in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Radha Kishan Goel

Date: Apr 22, 2005
Clarification on Explanation 5(2) under Section 271(1)(c): Allahabad High Court Upholds Tribunal Decision in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Radha Kishan Goel 1. Introduction The case of Commissioner...
Allahabad High Court Establishes Clarified Application of Sections 68 and 69 in Income Tax Cases

Allahabad High Court Establishes Clarified Application of Sections 68 and 69 in Income Tax Cases

Date: Apr 16, 2005
Allahabad High Court Establishes Clarified Application of Sections 68 and 69 in Income Tax Cases Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Jauharimal Goel was adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Public Interest Litigation for Environmental Preservation under Article 21: Vivek Srivastava v. Union Of India

Affirmation of Public Interest Litigation for Environmental Preservation under Article 21: Vivek Srivastava v. Union Of India

Date: Apr 13, 2005
Affirmation of Public Interest Litigation for Environmental Preservation under Article 21: Vivek Srivastava v. Union Of India Introduction The case of Vivek Srivastava v. Union Of India And Others...
Direct Employment Mandate for Tax Deductions: R And P Exports v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Direct Employment Mandate for Tax Deductions: R And P Exports v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Mar 25, 2005
Direct Employment Mandate for Tax Deductions: R And P Exports v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax 1. Introduction The case of R And P Exports v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax adjudicated by the Allahabad High...
Allahabad High Court Establishes Security Deposits as Non-Mortgage Deeds under Article 57(b), Schedule 1-B of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899

Allahabad High Court Establishes Security Deposits as Non-Mortgage Deeds under Article 57(b), Schedule 1-B of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899

Date: Mar 23, 2005
Allahabad High Court Establishes Security Deposits as Non-Mortgage Deeds under Article 57(b), Schedule 1-B of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Introduction The case of Strong Construction v. State of U.P...
Judicial Non-Interference with Administrative Transfer Orders in Absence of Mala Fide: Insights from Rajendra Prasad v. Union of India

Judicial Non-Interference with Administrative Transfer Orders in Absence of Mala Fide: Insights from Rajendra Prasad v. Union of India

Date: Mar 17, 2005
Judicial Non-Interference with Administrative Transfer Orders in Absence of Mala Fide: Insights from Rajendra Prasad v. Union of India Introduction The case of Rajendra Prasad v. Union Of India And...
Ravindra Raghav v. State Of U.P: Upholding Due Process in Police Dismissals

Ravindra Raghav v. State Of U.P: Upholding Due Process in Police Dismissals

Date: Mar 12, 2005
Ravindra Raghav v. State Of U.P: Upholding Due Process in Police Dismissals Introduction The case of Ravindra Raghav v. State Of U.P And Others adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on March 11,...
Proper Determination of Market Value under Section 47-A Stamp Act: Analysis of Ram Khelawan Bachcha v. State Of U.P

Proper Determination of Market Value under Section 47-A Stamp Act: Analysis of Ram Khelawan Bachcha v. State Of U.P

Date: Mar 5, 2005
Proper Determination of Market Value under Section 47-A Stamp Act: Analysis of Ram Khelawan Bachcha v. State Of U.P Introduction The case of Ram Khelawan Bachcha v. State Of U.P Through Collector,...
Establishing the Burden of Proof in Income Tax Assessments: Insights from Sri Ganesh Rice Mills v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Establishing the Burden of Proof in Income Tax Assessments: Insights from Sri Ganesh Rice Mills v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Mar 2, 2005
Establishing the Burden of Proof in Income Tax Assessments: Insights from Sri Ganesh Rice Mills v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Sri Ganesh Rice Mills v. Commissioner Of...
Reservation for Physically Disabled Persons in Judicial Services: Allahabad High Court's Decision in Sarika v. State Of U.P.

Reservation for Physically Disabled Persons in Judicial Services: Allahabad High Court's Decision in Sarika v. State Of U.P.

Date: Feb 25, 2005
Reservation for Physically Disabled Persons in Judicial Services: Allahabad High Court's Decision in Sarika v. State Of U.P. Introduction The case of Sarika v. State Of U.P. And Ors. adjudicated by...
Understanding the Judicial Handling of Protest Petitions: Insights from Yogendra Singh v. The State Of U.P And Others

Understanding the Judicial Handling of Protest Petitions: Insights from Yogendra Singh v. The State Of U.P And Others

Date: Feb 19, 2005
Understanding the Judicial Handling of Protest Petitions: Insights from Yogendra Singh v. The State Of U.P And Others Introduction The case of Yogendra Singh v. The State Of U.P And Others serves as...
Exemption of Partnership Firm Occupation under Section 22: Allahabad High Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Mustafa Khan

Exemption of Partnership Firm Occupation under Section 22: Allahabad High Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Mustafa Khan

Date: Feb 3, 2005
Exemption of Partnership Firm Occupation under Section 22: Allahabad High Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Mustafa Khan Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income-Tax, Allahabad v. Mustafa...
Judgment Commentary: Som Dutt Builders Limited v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others

Judgment Commentary: Som Dutt Builders Limited v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others

Date: Feb 3, 2005
Impracticability of Stamp Duty Penalties After Statutory Limitation: Insights from Som Dutt Builders Limited v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others Introduction The case of Som Dutt Builders Limited v....
Revocation of Dropped Penalty Proceedings Under Section 263: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Braj Bhushan Cold Storage

Revocation of Dropped Penalty Proceedings Under Section 263: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Braj Bhushan Cold Storage

Date: Jan 28, 2005
Revocation of Dropped Penalty Proceedings Under Section 263: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Braj Bhushan Cold Storage Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Braj Bhushan...
Strict Compliance with Rule 46A in Appellate Proceedings: Insights from Haji Lal Mohd. Biri Works v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Strict Compliance with Rule 46A in Appellate Proceedings: Insights from Haji Lal Mohd. Biri Works v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Jan 21, 2005
Strict Compliance with Rule 46A in Appellate Proceedings: Insights from Haji Lal Mohd. Biri Works v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Haji Lal Mohd. Biri Works v. Commissioner Of...
Allahabad High Court Validates Termination of Ad Hoc Stenographers Without Notice

Allahabad High Court Validates Termination of Ad Hoc Stenographers Without Notice

Date: Jan 21, 2005
Allahabad High Court Validates Termination of Ad Hoc Stenographers Without Notice Introduction The case of District & Sessions Judge v. Ratnesh Kumar Srivastava revolves around the termination of...
Revisiting the Burden of Proof in Employment Disputes: Insights from Union Bank of India v. Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T

Revisiting the Burden of Proof in Employment Disputes: Insights from Union Bank of India v. Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T

Date: Jan 7, 2005
Revisiting the Burden of Proof in Employment Disputes: Insights from Union Bank of India v. Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T Introduction The case of Union Bank Of India v. Presiding Officer, Central...
Mandatory Opportunity of Hearing Before Cancellation of Revenue Records: Chaturgun v. State of U.P.

Mandatory Opportunity of Hearing Before Cancellation of Revenue Records: Chaturgun v. State of U.P.

Date: Jan 6, 2005
Mandatory Opportunity of Hearing Before Cancellation of Revenue Records: Chaturgun v. State of U.P. Introduction The case of Chaturgun And Others v. State Of U.P And Others was adjudicated by the...
Non-Applicability of Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 to Educational Institutions: Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Prayag v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Allahabad

Non-Applicability of Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 to Educational Institutions: Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Prayag v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Allahabad

Date: Jan 5, 2005
Non-Applicability of Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 to Educational Institutions: Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Prayag v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Allahabad Introduction The case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert