Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Reaffirmation of Departmental Regulations in Police Disciplinary Proceedings: Kedar Nath Yadav v. State Of U.P.

Reaffirmation of Departmental Regulations in Police Disciplinary Proceedings: Kedar Nath Yadav v. State Of U.P.

Date: May 18, 2005
Reaffirmation of Departmental Regulations in Police Disciplinary Proceedings: Kedar Nath Yadav v. State Of U.P. Introduction The case of Kedar Nath Yadav v. State Of U.P. adjudicated by the Allahabad...
Validity of Reassessment Proceedings and Penalty Imposition under the Income-Tax Act: Insights from Bharat Rice Mill v. CIT

Validity of Reassessment Proceedings and Penalty Imposition under the Income-Tax Act: Insights from Bharat Rice Mill v. CIT

Date: May 10, 2005
Validity of Reassessment Proceedings and Penalty Imposition under the Income-Tax Act: Insights from Bharat Rice Mill v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Bharat Rice Mill v....
Protection of Due Process in Employment Terminations: Verdict in Laturi Singh v. State Public Service Tribunal

Protection of Due Process in Employment Terminations: Verdict in Laturi Singh v. State Public Service Tribunal

Date: May 7, 2005
Protection of Due Process in Employment Terminations: Verdict in Laturi Singh v. State Public Service Tribunal Introduction The case of Laturi Singh v. State Public Service Tribunal, U.P. & Ors. was...
Ceiling on Dearness Allowance for Work-Charge Employees Declared Unconstitutional: Prabhu Narain Sharma v. State Of U.P.

Ceiling on Dearness Allowance for Work-Charge Employees Declared Unconstitutional: Prabhu Narain Sharma v. State Of U.P.

Date: May 7, 2005
Ceiling on Dearness Allowance for Work-Charge Employees Declared Unconstitutional: Prabhu Narain Sharma v. State Of U.P. Introduction The case of Prabhu Narain Sharma v. State Of Uttar Pradesh,...
Enhanced Accountability in Manufacturing: Insights from Omax Shoe Factory v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Enhanced Accountability in Manufacturing: Insights from Omax Shoe Factory v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: May 6, 2005
Enhanced Accountability in Manufacturing: Insights from Omax Shoe Factory v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Omax Shoe Factory v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax was adjudicated by the...
Fixed Deposit Receipts Not Considered Valuable Assets under Section 271(1)(c): Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Mohan Lal Sharma

Fixed Deposit Receipts Not Considered Valuable Assets under Section 271(1)(c): Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Mohan Lal Sharma

Date: Apr 28, 2005
Fixed Deposit Receipts Not Considered Valuable Assets under Section 271(1)(c): Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Mohan Lal Sharma Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v....
Clarification on Explanation 5(2) under Section 271(1)(c): Allahabad High Court Upholds Tribunal Decision in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Radha Kishan Goel

Clarification on Explanation 5(2) under Section 271(1)(c): Allahabad High Court Upholds Tribunal Decision in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Radha Kishan Goel

Date: Apr 22, 2005
Clarification on Explanation 5(2) under Section 271(1)(c): Allahabad High Court Upholds Tribunal Decision in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Radha Kishan Goel 1. Introduction The case of Commissioner...
Allahabad High Court Establishes Clarified Application of Sections 68 and 69 in Income Tax Cases

Allahabad High Court Establishes Clarified Application of Sections 68 and 69 in Income Tax Cases

Date: Apr 16, 2005
Allahabad High Court Establishes Clarified Application of Sections 68 and 69 in Income Tax Cases Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Jauharimal Goel was adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Public Interest Litigation for Environmental Preservation under Article 21: Vivek Srivastava v. Union Of India

Affirmation of Public Interest Litigation for Environmental Preservation under Article 21: Vivek Srivastava v. Union Of India

Date: Apr 13, 2005
Affirmation of Public Interest Litigation for Environmental Preservation under Article 21: Vivek Srivastava v. Union Of India Introduction The case of Vivek Srivastava v. Union Of India And Others...
Direct Employment Mandate for Tax Deductions: R And P Exports v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Direct Employment Mandate for Tax Deductions: R And P Exports v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Mar 25, 2005
Direct Employment Mandate for Tax Deductions: R And P Exports v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax 1. Introduction The case of R And P Exports v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax adjudicated by the Allahabad High...
Allahabad High Court Establishes Security Deposits as Non-Mortgage Deeds under Article 57(b), Schedule 1-B of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899

Allahabad High Court Establishes Security Deposits as Non-Mortgage Deeds under Article 57(b), Schedule 1-B of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899

Date: Mar 23, 2005
Allahabad High Court Establishes Security Deposits as Non-Mortgage Deeds under Article 57(b), Schedule 1-B of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Introduction The case of Strong Construction v. State of U.P...
Judicial Non-Interference with Administrative Transfer Orders in Absence of Mala Fide: Insights from Rajendra Prasad v. Union of India

Judicial Non-Interference with Administrative Transfer Orders in Absence of Mala Fide: Insights from Rajendra Prasad v. Union of India

Date: Mar 17, 2005
Judicial Non-Interference with Administrative Transfer Orders in Absence of Mala Fide: Insights from Rajendra Prasad v. Union of India Introduction The case of Rajendra Prasad v. Union Of India And...
Ravindra Raghav v. State Of U.P: Upholding Due Process in Police Dismissals

Ravindra Raghav v. State Of U.P: Upholding Due Process in Police Dismissals

Date: Mar 12, 2005
Ravindra Raghav v. State Of U.P: Upholding Due Process in Police Dismissals Introduction The case of Ravindra Raghav v. State Of U.P And Others adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on March 11,...
Proper Determination of Market Value under Section 47-A Stamp Act: Analysis of Ram Khelawan Bachcha v. State Of U.P

Proper Determination of Market Value under Section 47-A Stamp Act: Analysis of Ram Khelawan Bachcha v. State Of U.P

Date: Mar 5, 2005
Proper Determination of Market Value under Section 47-A Stamp Act: Analysis of Ram Khelawan Bachcha v. State Of U.P Introduction The case of Ram Khelawan Bachcha v. State Of U.P Through Collector,...
Establishing the Burden of Proof in Income Tax Assessments: Insights from Sri Ganesh Rice Mills v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Establishing the Burden of Proof in Income Tax Assessments: Insights from Sri Ganesh Rice Mills v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Mar 2, 2005
Establishing the Burden of Proof in Income Tax Assessments: Insights from Sri Ganesh Rice Mills v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Sri Ganesh Rice Mills v. Commissioner Of...
Reservation for Physically Disabled Persons in Judicial Services: Allahabad High Court's Decision in Sarika v. State Of U.P.

Reservation for Physically Disabled Persons in Judicial Services: Allahabad High Court's Decision in Sarika v. State Of U.P.

Date: Feb 25, 2005
Reservation for Physically Disabled Persons in Judicial Services: Allahabad High Court's Decision in Sarika v. State Of U.P. Introduction The case of Sarika v. State Of U.P. And Ors. adjudicated by...
Understanding the Judicial Handling of Protest Petitions: Insights from Yogendra Singh v. The State Of U.P And Others

Understanding the Judicial Handling of Protest Petitions: Insights from Yogendra Singh v. The State Of U.P And Others

Date: Feb 19, 2005
Understanding the Judicial Handling of Protest Petitions: Insights from Yogendra Singh v. The State Of U.P And Others Introduction The case of Yogendra Singh v. The State Of U.P And Others serves as...
Exemption of Partnership Firm Occupation under Section 22: Allahabad High Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Mustafa Khan

Exemption of Partnership Firm Occupation under Section 22: Allahabad High Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Mustafa Khan

Date: Feb 3, 2005
Exemption of Partnership Firm Occupation under Section 22: Allahabad High Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Mustafa Khan Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income-Tax, Allahabad v. Mustafa...
Judgment Commentary: Som Dutt Builders Limited v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others

Judgment Commentary: Som Dutt Builders Limited v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others

Date: Feb 3, 2005
Impracticability of Stamp Duty Penalties After Statutory Limitation: Insights from Som Dutt Builders Limited v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others Introduction The case of Som Dutt Builders Limited v....
Revocation of Dropped Penalty Proceedings Under Section 263: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Braj Bhushan Cold Storage

Revocation of Dropped Penalty Proceedings Under Section 263: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Braj Bhushan Cold Storage

Date: Jan 28, 2005
Revocation of Dropped Penalty Proceedings Under Section 263: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Braj Bhushan Cold Storage Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Braj Bhushan...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert