Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Mandatory Compliance with Section 143(2) After Filing Fresh Return Under Section 148: Allahabad High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-II v. Rajeev Sharma

Mandatory Compliance with Section 143(2) After Filing Fresh Return Under Section 148: Allahabad High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-II v. Rajeev Sharma

Date: May 25, 2010
Strict Adherence to Procedural Mandates in Escaped Assessments: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax-II Lucknow v. Rajeev Sharma Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income Tax-II Lucknow...
Allahabad High Court's Landmark Decision on Section 57(iii) Deductions in Income Tax: Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. Smt. Swapna Roy

Allahabad High Court's Landmark Decision on Section 57(iii) Deductions in Income Tax: Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. Smt. Swapna Roy

Date: May 25, 2010
Allahabad High Court's Landmark Decision on Section 57(iii) Deductions in Income Tax: Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. Smt. Swapna Roy Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax...
Tax Classification of Rental Income for Commercial Properties: Insights from The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Goel Builders

Tax Classification of Rental Income for Commercial Properties: Insights from The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Goel Builders

Date: May 25, 2010
Tax Classification of Rental Income for Commercial Properties: Insights from The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Goel Builders Introduction The case of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Goel...
Continuation of Officiating Principalship Post-Superannuation: Surendra Prasad Agnihotri v. State of U.P And Others

Continuation of Officiating Principalship Post-Superannuation: Surendra Prasad Agnihotri v. State of U.P And Others

Date: May 21, 2010
Continuation of Officiating Principalship Post-Superannuation: Surendra Prasad Agnihotri v. State of U.P And Others 1. Introduction The case of Surendra Prasad Agnihotri v. State of U.P And Others...
Validity of Land Acquisition Under Section 17(4) Exacerbates Urgent Housing Needs: Analysis of M/S Sahara India Commercial Corp. Ltd. & Others v. State Of UP And Others

Validity of Land Acquisition Under Section 17(4) Exacerbates Urgent Housing Needs: Analysis of M/S Sahara India Commercial Corp. Ltd. & Others v. State Of UP And Others

Date: May 15, 2010
Validity of Land Acquisition Under Section 17(4) Exacerbates Urgent Housing Needs M/S Sahara India Commercial Corp. Ltd. & Others v. State Of UP And Others Allahabad High Court | Date: May 14, 2010...
Voluntary Disclosure and Penalty under Section 271(1)(c): Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Petitioner v. Sri Rakesh Suri

Voluntary Disclosure and Penalty under Section 271(1)(c): Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Petitioner v. Sri Rakesh Suri

Date: May 14, 2010
Voluntary Disclosure and Penalty under Section 271(1)(c): Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Petitioner v. Sri Rakesh Suri Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Petitioner...
Mandatory Issuance of Notice under Section 143(2) in Block Assessments: Virendra Dev Dixit v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Mandatory Issuance of Notice under Section 143(2) in Block Assessments: Virendra Dev Dixit v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Apr 20, 2010
Mandatory Issuance of Notice under Section 143(2) in Block Assessments: Virendra Dev Dixit v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of Virendra Dev Dixit v. Asstt. Commissioner Of...
Allahabad High Court Upholds Section 142A's Applicability to Construction Investments in Income Tax Assessments

Allahabad High Court Upholds Section 142A's Applicability to Construction Investments in Income Tax Assessments

Date: Apr 16, 2010
Allahabad High Court Upholds Section 142A's Applicability to Construction Investments in Income Tax Assessments Introduction In the landmark case of M/S Sunder Carpet Industries Petitioner v. Income...
Acquittal Due to Lost Records: Brahmanand Shukla v. State Of U.P

Acquittal Due to Lost Records: Brahmanand Shukla v. State Of U.P

Date: Apr 16, 2010
Acquittal Due to Lost Records: Brahmanand Shukla v. State Of U.P Introduction The case of Brahmanand Shukla v. State Of U.P revolves around the appellate proceedings following the conviction of...
Deduction Applicability for Multi-Unit Businesses: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Modi Xerox Ltd.

Deduction Applicability for Multi-Unit Businesses: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Modi Xerox Ltd.

Date: Apr 16, 2010
Deduction Applicability for Multi-Unit Businesses: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Modi Xerox Ltd. Introduction The case of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Meerut & Another v. M/S....
Judicial Discretion in Issuing Commissions: Insights from Avinash Chandra Tewari v. A.D.J, Unnao

Judicial Discretion in Issuing Commissions: Insights from Avinash Chandra Tewari v. A.D.J, Unnao

Date: Apr 6, 2010
Judicial Discretion in Issuing Commissions: Insights from Avinash Chandra Tewari v. A.D.J, Unnao And Others Introduction The case of Avinash Chandra Tewari v. A.D.J, Court No. 3, Unnao And Others,...
Limitation on Reopening Assessments under Section 147: Insights from Vishwanath Prasad Ashok Kumar Sarraf v. C.I.T

Limitation on Reopening Assessments under Section 147: Insights from Vishwanath Prasad Ashok Kumar Sarraf v. C.I.T

Date: Apr 6, 2010
Limitation on Reopening Assessments under Section 147: Insights from Vishwanath Prasad Ashok Kumar Sarraf v. C.I.T Introduction The case of Vishwanath Prasad Ashok Kumar Sarraf, Varanasi v. C.I.T,...
Puran Singh v. State Of U.P: Suspension of Fair Price Shop License Without Opportunity to be Heard

Puran Singh v. State Of U.P: Suspension of Fair Price Shop License Without Opportunity to be Heard

Date: Apr 6, 2010
Puran Singh v. State Of U.P: Suspension of Fair Price Shop License Without Opportunity to be Heard Introduction The case of Puran Singh v. State Of U.P & Ors. was adjudicated by the Allahabad High...
Daya Shanker Mishra v. District Inspector Of Schools: Affirmation of Management's Power for Ad Hoc Appointments on Short-Term Vacancies

Daya Shanker Mishra v. District Inspector Of Schools: Affirmation of Management's Power for Ad Hoc Appointments on Short-Term Vacancies

Date: Apr 1, 2010
Daya Shanker Mishra v. District Inspector Of Schools: Affirmation of Management's Power for Ad Hoc Appointments on Short-Term Vacancies Introduction The case of Daya Shanker Mishra v. District...
Limitation on Suo Motu Cancellation of Land Allotments under the U.P Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act: Insights from Suresh Giri & Ors. v. Board Of Revenue, U.P At Allahabad & Ors.

Limitation on Suo Motu Cancellation of Land Allotments under the U.P Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act: Insights from Suresh Giri & Ors. v. Board Of Revenue, U.P At Allahabad & Ors.

Date: Feb 27, 2010
Limitation on Suo Motu Cancellation of Land Allotments under the U.P Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act: Insights from Suresh Giri & Ors. v. Board Of Revenue, U.P At Allahabad & Ors....
Interpretation of Possession Under the Urban Land Ceiling Act: Ram Chandra Pandey v. State of U.P.

Interpretation of Possession Under the Urban Land Ceiling Act: Ram Chandra Pandey v. State of U.P.

Date: Feb 19, 2010
Interpretation of Possession Under the Urban Land Ceiling Act: Ram Chandra Pandey v. State of U.P. Introduction Case: Ram Chandra Pandey v. State Of U.P. Through Secretary Avas, Lucknow And Others...
Clarifying the Boundaries: The Precedential Impact of Rohtash Singh Chauhan v. State Of U.P

Clarifying the Boundaries: The Precedential Impact of Rohtash Singh Chauhan v. State Of U.P

Date: Jan 26, 2010
Clarifying the Boundaries: The Precedential Impact of Rohtash Singh Chauhan v. State Of U.P Introduction The case of Rohtash Singh Chauhan And Others v. State Of U.P And Others adjudicated by the...
Allahabad High Court Establishes Precedence on Construction Date Verification in Tenancy Cases

Allahabad High Court Establishes Precedence on Construction Date Verification in Tenancy Cases

Date: Jan 6, 2010
Allahabad High Court Establishes Precedence on Construction Date Verification in Tenancy Cases Introduction The case of Smt. Sangeeta Goel v. Smt. Chandrakanta Bansal adjudicated by the Allahabad...
Finality of Settlement Commission's Orders: Insights from Smt. Neeru Agarwal vs Union Of India

Finality of Settlement Commission's Orders: Insights from Smt. Neeru Agarwal vs Union Of India

Date: Dec 19, 2009
Finality of Settlement Commission's Orders: Insights from Smt. Neeru Agarwal Petitioner v. Union Of India & Others Introduction The case of Smt. Neeru Agarwal Petitioner v. Union Of India & Others...
Exemption of Bhumidhari Land Exchanges from Stamp Duty: Comprehensive Commentary on Arezzo Developers v. State of U.P.

Exemption of Bhumidhari Land Exchanges from Stamp Duty: Comprehensive Commentary on Arezzo Developers v. State of U.P.

Date: Dec 12, 2009
Exemption of Bhumidhari Land Exchanges from Stamp Duty: Comprehensive Commentary on Arezzo Developers v. State of U.P. Introduction The case of M/S. Arezzo Developers Private Limited And Others...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert