Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Affirming Mandatory Pre-Deposits for Tax Appeals and Vested Rights: Ganesh Yadav v. Union of India

Affirming Mandatory Pre-Deposits for Tax Appeals and Vested Rights: Ganesh Yadav v. Union of India

Date: May 30, 2015
Affirming Mandatory Pre-Deposits for Tax Appeals and Vested Rights: Ganesh Yadav v. Union of India Introduction The case Ganesh Yadav v. Union Of India adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on May...
Merit Supremacy in Recruitment: Allahabad High Court Upholds Reserved Category Candidates' Right to Compete in Unreserved Posts

Merit Supremacy in Recruitment: Allahabad High Court Upholds Reserved Category Candidates' Right to Compete in Unreserved Posts

Date: May 20, 2015
Merit Supremacy in Recruitment: Allahabad High Court Upholds Reserved Category Candidates' Right to Compete in Unreserved Posts Introduction The case titled U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. And Another v....
Year of Recruitment Determines Eligibility for Teacher Promotion: Raeesul Hasan v. State of U.P.

Year of Recruitment Determines Eligibility for Teacher Promotion: Raeesul Hasan v. State of U.P.

Date: May 15, 2015
Year of Recruitment Determines Eligibility for Teacher Promotion: Raeesul Hasan v. State of U.P. Introduction The case of Raeesul Hasan Petitioner v. State Of U.P. Through Secy. Education And 5 Ors....
Uniformity in Examination Corrections: Insights from State Of U.P. & Others v. Pankaj Kumar

Uniformity in Examination Corrections: Insights from State Of U.P. & Others v. Pankaj Kumar

Date: May 7, 2015
Uniformity in Examination Corrections: Insights from State Of U.P. & Others v. Pankaj Kumar Introduction The case of State Of U.P. & Others v. Pankaj Kumar adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Extended Limitation in Cenvat Credit Availment: Ghaziabad High Court Upholds Department's Stance

Extended Limitation in Cenvat Credit Availment: Ghaziabad High Court Upholds Department's Stance

Date: May 5, 2015
Extended Limitation in Cenvat Credit Availment: Ghaziabad High Court Upholds Department's Stance Introduction The case of Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Ghaziabad v. Rathi Steel & Power...
Revisiting Juvenile Bail Standards: A Commentary on Maroof v. State Of U.P. And Ors.

Revisiting Juvenile Bail Standards: A Commentary on Maroof v. State Of U.P. And Ors.

Date: Apr 24, 2015
Revisiting Juvenile Bail Standards: A Commentary on Maroof v. State Of U.P. And Ors. Introduction The case of Maroof v. State Of U.P. And Ors., adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on April 23,...
Dismissal of Police Personnel on Criminal Conviction: Interpretation of Article 311(2)(a)

Dismissal of Police Personnel on Criminal Conviction: Interpretation of Article 311(2)(a)

Date: Mar 26, 2015
Dismissal of Police Personnel on Criminal Conviction: Interpretation of Article 311(2)(a) Introduction The case of State Of U.P. Thru. Sec. Home And Others v. Prem Milan Tiwari, Constable adjudicated...
Regulation 101 Amendment and Its Implications: Insights from Abhishek Tripathi v. State Of U.P. And Others

Regulation 101 Amendment and Its Implications: Insights from Abhishek Tripathi v. State Of U.P. And Others

Date: Mar 21, 2015
Regulation 101 Amendment and Its Implications: Insights from Abhishek Tripathi v. State Of U.P. And Others Introduction The case of Abhishek Tripathi v. State Of U.P. And Others delivered by the...
Welding Electrodes Excluded as Capital Goods under Rule 57Q for MODVAT/CENVAT Credit

Welding Electrodes Excluded as Capital Goods under Rule 57Q for MODVAT/CENVAT Credit

Date: Feb 26, 2015
Welding Electrodes Excluded as Capital Goods under Rule 57Q for MODVAT/CENVAT Credit Introduction The case of M/S. Upper Ganges Sugar & Industries Ltd. v. The Commissioner Customs & Central Excise...
Allahabad High Court Upholds Administrative Transfer of Under Trial Prisoners in Uttar Pradesh

Allahabad High Court Upholds Administrative Transfer of Under Trial Prisoners in Uttar Pradesh

Date: Feb 26, 2015
Allahabad High Court Upholds Administrative Transfer of Under Trial Prisoners in Uttar Pradesh Introduction The case of Ritesh Bantu Petitioner v. State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 3 Others was...
Procedural Fairness in Consolidation Proceedings: Banshraj v. Dy. Director Of Consolidation Basti

Procedural Fairness in Consolidation Proceedings: Banshraj v. Dy. Director Of Consolidation Basti

Date: Feb 25, 2015
Procedural Fairness in Consolidation Proceedings: Banshraj v. Dy. Director Of Consolidation Basti Introduction The case of Banshraj And 6 Others Petitioners v. Dy. Director Of Consolidation Basti And...
Pushpa Sareen v. State Of U.P. (2015): Expanding the Scope of Market Value Determination under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act

Pushpa Sareen v. State Of U.P. (2015): Expanding the Scope of Market Value Determination under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act

Date: Feb 13, 2015
Pushpa Sareen v. State Of U.P. (2015): Expanding the Scope of Market Value Determination under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act Introduction The case of Pushpa Sareen v. State Of U.P. adjudicated...
Allahabad High Court Reaffirms Judicial Consistency and Proper Procedure in Fair Price Shop Licensing Appeals

Allahabad High Court Reaffirms Judicial Consistency and Proper Procedure in Fair Price Shop Licensing Appeals

Date: Feb 7, 2015
Allahabad High Court Reaffirms Judicial Consistency and Proper Procedure in Fair Price Shop Licensing Appeals Introduction The case of Smt. Urmila And 4 Others Petitioners v. State Of U.P. And 3...
Deemed Registration Not Applicable for Non-Disposal of Section 12AA(2) Applications: Allahabad High Court Sets New Precedent

Deemed Registration Not Applicable for Non-Disposal of Section 12AA(2) Applications: Allahabad High Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Feb 6, 2015
Deemed Registration Not Applicable for Non-Disposal of Section 12AA(2) Applications: Allahabad High Court Sets New Precedent Introduction The case of Commissioner Income Tax v. Muzafar Nagar...
Enhanced Guidelines for Land Compensation Valuation in Land Acquisition: Analysis of Power Grid Corporation v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Enhanced Guidelines for Land Compensation Valuation in Land Acquisition: Analysis of Power Grid Corporation v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Date: Feb 5, 2015
Enhanced Guidelines for Land Compensation Valuation in Land Acquisition: Analysis of Power Grid Corporation v. State of Uttar Pradesh Introduction The landmark judgment in Power Grid Corporation of...
Discretionary Authority of Collector in No-Confidence Motions: Insights from Smt. Sheela Devi v. State Of U.P. & Ors.

Discretionary Authority of Collector in No-Confidence Motions: Insights from Smt. Sheela Devi v. State Of U.P. & Ors.

Date: Feb 3, 2015
Discretionary Authority of Collector in No-Confidence Motions: Insights from Smt. Sheela Devi v. State Of U.P. & Ors. Introduction Smt. Sheela Devi v. State Of U.P. & Ors. is a landmark judgment...
Revival of the 1986 Transfer Policy in Ram Adhar Maurya v. State of U.P.: A Comprehensive Analysis

Revival of the 1986 Transfer Policy in Ram Adhar Maurya v. State of U.P.: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Jan 20, 2015
Revival of the 1986 Transfer Policy in Ram Adhar Maurya v. State of U.P.: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of Ram Adhar Maurya and Another Petitioners v. State Of U.P. And 2 Ors....
Allahabad HC Reaffirms Predominant Educational Purpose for Tax Exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act

Allahabad HC Reaffirms Predominant Educational Purpose for Tax Exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act

Date: Jan 7, 2015
Allahabad High Court Affirms Predominant Educational Purpose for Tax Exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act Introduction The case of Allahabad Young Mens Christian Association...
Equitable Recruitment Practices under Article 14 & 16: Insights from Matin Rao & Anr. v. State Of U.P. & Ors.

Equitable Recruitment Practices under Article 14 & 16: Insights from Matin Rao & Anr. v. State Of U.P. & Ors.

Date: Dec 24, 2014
Equitable Recruitment Practices under Article 14 & 16: Insights from Matin Rao & Anr. v. State Of U.P. & Ors. Introduction The case of Matin Rao & Anr. v. State Of U.P. & Ors. adjudicated by the...
Defining Public Authority under RTI Act: Insights from A. Pavitra Petitioner v. Union Of India And 2 Ors.

Defining Public Authority under RTI Act: Insights from A. Pavitra Petitioner v. Union Of India And 2 Ors.

Date: Dec 16, 2014
Defining Public Authority under RTI Act: Insights from A. Pavitra Petitioner v. Union Of India And 2 Ors. Introduction The case of A. Pavitra Petitioner v. Union Of India And 2 Ors. delivered by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert