Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Partial Abatement of Appeals in Multi-Defendant Suits: The Baij Nath v. Ram Bharose Precedent

Partial Abatement of Appeals in Multi-Defendant Suits: The Baij Nath v. Ram Bharose Precedent

Date: Apr 11, 1953
Partial Abatement of Appeals in Multi-Defendant Suits: The Baij Nath v. Ram Bharose Precedent Introduction The case of Baij Nath v. Ram Bharose, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on April 10,...
Extension of Adjudication Period and Jurisdiction in Industrial Disputes

Extension of Adjudication Period and Jurisdiction in Industrial Disputes

Date: Apr 10, 1953
Extension of Adjudication Period and Jurisdiction in Industrial Disputes: J.K. Iron And Steel Co. Limited v. Labour Appellate Tribunal Of India Introduction The case of J.K. Iron And Steel Co....
Allahabad High Court Establishes Rigorous Application of Section 34 IPC in Joint Offences: Bashir v. State, 1953

Allahabad High Court Establishes Rigorous Application of Section 34 IPC in Joint Offences: Bashir v. State, 1953

Date: Mar 20, 1953
Allahabad High Court Establishes Rigorous Application of Section 34 IPC in Joint Offences: Bashir v. State, 1953 Introduction In the landmark case of Bashir v. State adjudicated by the Allahabad High...
Withdrawn Candidates and Necessary Parties: Sheo Kumar v. V.G. Oak Sets Precedent

Withdrawn Candidates and Necessary Parties: Sheo Kumar v. V.G. Oak Sets Precedent

Date: Mar 20, 1953
Withdrawn Candidates and Necessary Parties: Sheo Kumar v. V.G. Oak Sets Precedent Introduction The case of Sheo Kumar v. V.G. Oak, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on March 19, 1953, addresses...
Contempt of Court in Pre-Initiated Proceedings: Insights from Dwarka Prasad Agarwal v. Krishna Chandra Sharma And Others

Contempt of Court in Pre-Initiated Proceedings: Insights from Dwarka Prasad Agarwal v. Krishna Chandra Sharma And Others

Date: Mar 17, 1953
Contempt of Court in Pre-Initiated Proceedings: Insights from Dwarka Prasad Agarwal v. Krishna Chandra Sharma And Others Introduction The case of Dwarka Prasad Agarwal v. Krishna Chandra Sharma And...
Bimla Devi v. Sri Chaturvedi: Upholding Legislative Competence in Abduction Restoration

Bimla Devi v. Sri Chaturvedi: Upholding Legislative Competence in Abduction Restoration

Date: Mar 13, 1953
Bimla Devi v. Sri Chaturvedi: Upholding Legislative Competence in Abduction Restoration Allahabad High Court, 1953 Introduction Bimla Devi v. Sri Chaturvedi And Others is a landmark judgment...
Maqbul-Un-Nissa v. Union Of India: Jurisdictional Boundaries under Article 226

Maqbul-Un-Nissa v. Union Of India: Jurisdictional Boundaries under Article 226

Date: Jan 15, 1953
Maqbul-Un-Nissa v. Union Of India: Jurisdictional Boundaries under Article 226 Introduction The case of Maqbul-Un-Nissa v. Union Of India (1953) is a landmark judgment delivered by the Allahabad High...
Allahabad High Court Establishes Validity of Ancestral Land Possession Over Unauthorized Licenses: Pheku Chamar v. Harish Chandra

Allahabad High Court Establishes Validity of Ancestral Land Possession Over Unauthorized Licenses: Pheku Chamar v. Harish Chandra

Date: Jan 10, 1953
Allahabad High Court Establishes Validity of Ancestral Land Possession Over Unauthorized Licenses: Pheku Chamar v. Harish Chandra Introduction The case of Pheku Chamar v. Harish Chandra adjudicated...
Promissory Notes as Collateral: Insights from Lakshmi Narain v. Aparna Devi

Promissory Notes as Collateral: Insights from Lakshmi Narain v. Aparna Devi

Date: Jan 7, 1953
Promissory Notes as Collateral: Insights from Lakshmi Narain v. Aparna Devi Introduction The case of Lakshmi Narain v. Aparna Devi, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on January 6, 1953,...
Protection of Hindu Charitable Trust Property Without Written Instrument: Lalta Prasad v. Brahmanand And Others

Protection of Hindu Charitable Trust Property Without Written Instrument: Lalta Prasad v. Brahmanand And Others

Date: Nov 15, 1952
Protection of Hindu Charitable Trust Property Without Written Instrument: Lalta Prasad v. Brahmanand And Others Introduction Lalta Prasad v. Brahmanand And Others is a landmark judgment delivered by...
Land Acquisition for Public Purposes: Insights from Brij Nath Sarin v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Land Acquisition for Public Purposes: Insights from Brij Nath Sarin v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Date: Oct 28, 1952
Land Acquisition for Public Purposes: Insights from Brij Nath Sarin v. State of Uttar Pradesh Introduction Brij Nath Sarin v. State of Uttar Pradesh is a landmark judgment delivered by the Allahabad...
Establishing Subordination of Revenue Courts to High Courts under the Contempt of Courts Act: Satdeo Pandey v. Baba Raghav Das

Establishing Subordination of Revenue Courts to High Courts under the Contempt of Courts Act: Satdeo Pandey v. Baba Raghav Das

Date: Sep 16, 1952
Establishing Subordination of Revenue Courts to High Courts under the Contempt of Courts Act: Satdeo Pandey v. Baba Raghav Das Introduction The case of Satdeo Pandey v. Baba Raghav Das, adjudicated...
Assessment of Income Tax Liability for Pre-Incorporation Period: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bijli Cotton Mills Limited

Assessment of Income Tax Liability for Pre-Incorporation Period: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bijli Cotton Mills Limited

Date: Sep 4, 1952
Assessment of Income Tax Liability for Pre-Incorporation Period: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bijli Cotton Mills Limited Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bijli Cotton Mills...
Sheo Lal v. Devi Das: Multi-Accrual Doctrine for Final Decree Applications under Article 181

Sheo Lal v. Devi Das: Multi-Accrual Doctrine for Final Decree Applications under Article 181

Date: Aug 5, 1952
Sheo Lal v. Devi Das: Multi-Accrual Doctrine for Final Decree Applications under Article 181 Introduction The case of Sheo Lal And Another v. Devi Das And Another is a landmark judgment delivered by...
Rescission of Offers Under the Indian Oaths Act: Insights from Saheb Ram v. Ram Newaz

Rescission of Offers Under the Indian Oaths Act: Insights from Saheb Ram v. Ram Newaz

Date: Aug 5, 1952
Rescission of Offers Under the Indian Oaths Act: Insights from Saheb Ram v. Ram Newaz Introduction The case of Saheb Ram v. Ram Newaz, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on August 4, 1952,...
Clarification on Non-Delivery Claims and Limitation Period under the Indian Railways Act: Insights from Mutsaddi Lal v. Governor-General In Council

Clarification on Non-Delivery Claims and Limitation Period under the Indian Railways Act: Insights from Mutsaddi Lal v. Governor-General In Council

Date: Jul 26, 1952
Clarification on Non-Delivery Claims and Limitation Period under the Indian Railways Act: Insights from Mutsaddi Lal v. Governor-General In Council Introduction The case of Mutsaddi Lal v....
Kedar Nath v. Mool Chand: Defining the Authority of District Magistrate in Eviction Cases

Kedar Nath v. Mool Chand: Defining the Authority of District Magistrate in Eviction Cases

Date: Jul 24, 1952
Kedar Nath v. Mool Chand: Defining the Authority of District Magistrate in Eviction Cases Introduction The case of Kedar Nath v. Mool Chand adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on July 23, 1952,...
Governor-General in Council v. Mahabir Ram: Interpretation of 'Loss' Under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act

Governor-General in Council v. Mahabir Ram: Interpretation of 'Loss' Under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act

Date: May 15, 1952
Governor-General in Council v. Mahabir Ram: Interpretation of 'Loss' Under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act Introduction The case of Governor-General in Council v. Mahabir Ram was adjudicated by...
Pratap Singh v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Defining Agricultural Income in Forestry Operations

Pratap Singh v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Defining Agricultural Income in Forestry Operations

Date: May 3, 1952
Pratap Singh v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Defining Agricultural Income in Forestry Operations Introduction The case of Pratap Singh v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, adjudicated by the Allahabad High...
Precedent Established on Contempt of Court: Lakhan Singh v. Balbir Singh

Precedent Established on Contempt of Court: Lakhan Singh v. Balbir Singh

Date: May 1, 1952
Precedent Established on Contempt of Court: Lakhan Singh v. Balbir Singh Introduction Lakhan Singh v. Balbir Singh is a landmark judgment delivered by the Allahabad High Court on April 30, 1952. This...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert