Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All Tribunals Case Commentaries

CENVAT Credit Eligibility for Pre-Amendment Input Services: Indore Treasure Market City Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, CESTAT

CENVAT Credit Eligibility for Pre-Amendment Input Services: Indore Treasure Market City Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, CESTAT

Date: Sep 2, 2021
CENVAT Credit Eligibility for Pre-Amendment Input Services Indore Treasure Market City Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, CESTAT (2021) 1. Introduction The case of M/s Indore Treasure Market City Pvt. Ltd....
Establishing Consumer Rights: NCDRC Validates Consumer Status and Ensures Delay Compensation in Real Estate Disputes

Establishing Consumer Rights: NCDRC Validates Consumer Status and Ensures Delay Compensation in Real Estate Disputes

Date: Sep 1, 2021
Establishing Consumer Rights: NCDRC Validates Consumer Status and Ensures Delay Compensation in Real Estate Disputes Introduction The case of Girish Wadhwa & Anr. v. M/S. IREO Grace Realtech Pvt....
Enhanced Consumer Protection in Real Estate: Insights from Shalabh Nigam v. M/S. Ireo Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd.

Enhanced Consumer Protection in Real Estate: Insights from Shalabh Nigam v. M/S. Ireo Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Sep 1, 2021
Enhanced Consumer Protection in Real Estate: Insights from Shalabh Nigam v. M/S. Ireo Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Shalabh Nigam v. M/S. Ireo Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd. & 4 ORS....
Refund of Unspent Consumer Contribution in Capitalization: A Landmark Judgment by APTEL

Refund of Unspent Consumer Contribution in Capitalization: A Landmark Judgment by APTEL

Date: Sep 1, 2021
Refund of Unspent Consumer Contribution in Capitalization: A Landmark Judgment by APTEL Introduction The case titled BSES Yamuna Power Limited v. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (Appellate...
ITA Bangalore Refines Eligibility Criteria for Section 80P Deductions in Cooperative Societies Dealing with Nominal and Associate Members

ITA Bangalore Refines Eligibility Criteria for Section 80P Deductions in Cooperative Societies Dealing with Nominal and Associate Members

Date: Sep 1, 2021
ITA Bangalore Refines Eligibility Criteria for Section 80P Deductions in Cooperative Societies Dealing with Nominal and Associate Members Introduction The case of M/s. Ravindra Multipurpose...
Enhancing Consumer Protection in Real Estate: Landmark Judgment in Dinesh Chand Sharma v. M/S. IREO Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd.

Enhancing Consumer Protection in Real Estate: Landmark Judgment in Dinesh Chand Sharma v. M/S. IREO Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Sep 1, 2021
Enhancing Consumer Protection in Real Estate: Landmark Judgment in Dinesh Chand Sharma v. M/S. IREO Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Dinesh Chand Sharma v. M/S. IREO Grace Realtech...
Establishing Consumer Rights in Real Estate Delays: Sanjay Gopinath v. M/s. Ireo GRACE REALTECH PVT. LTD.

Establishing Consumer Rights in Real Estate Delays: Sanjay Gopinath v. M/s. Ireo GRACE REALTECH PVT. LTD.

Date: Sep 1, 2021
Establishing Consumer Rights in Real Estate Delays: Sanjay Gopinath v. M/s. Ireo GRACE REALTECH PVT. LTD. Introduction The case of Sanjay Gopinath v. M/s. Ireo GRACE REALTECH PVT. LTD. was...
NCLAT Reinforces Section 14 Moratorium Protections under IBC: SM Milkose Limited v. Parvinder Kumar Bhatt

NCLAT Reinforces Section 14 Moratorium Protections under IBC: SM Milkose Limited v. Parvinder Kumar Bhatt

Date: Aug 28, 2021
NCLAT Reinforces Section 14 Moratorium Protections under IBC: SM Milkose Limited v. Parvinder Kumar Bhatt Introduction The case of SM Milkose Limited And Another v. Parvinder Kumar Bhatt And Others...
Kolkata CESTAT Judgment: Abolishing Rule 6 CCR Reversal for Restaurant Services and Limiting Penalty under Section 78 of Finance Act

Kolkata CESTAT Judgment: Abolishing Rule 6 CCR Reversal for Restaurant Services and Limiting Penalty under Section 78 of Finance Act

Date: Aug 28, 2021
Kolkata CESTAT Judgment: Abolishing Rule 6 CCR Reversal for Restaurant Services and Limiting Penalty under Section 78 of Finance Act Introduction The case of Kolkata North Commissionerate v. Asian...
Exclusion of Amortization of Goodwill as Non-Recurring Expense in TNMM Calculations: Insights from DHR Holding India Pvt. Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax

Exclusion of Amortization of Goodwill as Non-Recurring Expense in TNMM Calculations: Insights from DHR Holding India Pvt. Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Aug 28, 2021
Exclusion of Amortization of Goodwill as Non-Recurring Expense in TNMM Calculations: Insights from DHR Holding India Pvt. Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax 1. Introduction The case of DHR...
ITAAT Clarifies TDS Reconciliation and Upholds Timely PF & ESI Contributions Deductions

ITAAT Clarifies TDS Reconciliation and Upholds Timely PF & ESI Contributions Deductions

Date: Aug 28, 2021
ITAAT Clarifies TDS Reconciliation and Upholds Timely PF & ESI Contributions Deductions Introduction The case of Indian Geotechnical Services, New Delhi v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,...
DLF Universal Ltd's Unlawful Contingent VAT Demand Deemed Unfair Trade Practice: A Landmark Judgment

DLF Universal Ltd's Unlawful Contingent VAT Demand Deemed Unfair Trade Practice: A Landmark Judgment

Date: Aug 27, 2021
DLF Universal Ltd's Unlawful Contingent VAT Demand Deemed Unfair Trade Practice: A Landmark Judgment Introduction The case of Amit Aggarwal v. DLF Universal Ltd adjudicated by the District Consumer...
Excluding Personal Guarantees in Resolution Plans: Insights from Nitin Chandrakant Naik v. Sanidhya Industries LLP

Excluding Personal Guarantees in Resolution Plans: Insights from Nitin Chandrakant Naik v. Sanidhya Industries LLP

Date: Aug 27, 2021
Excluding Personal Guarantees in Resolution Plans: Insights from Nitin Chandrakant Naik v. Sanidhya Industries LLP Introduction The case of Nitin Chandrakant Naik And Another v. Sanidhya Industries...
Doshi Holdings Pvt. Ltd. v. Anand Rathi Global Finance Ltd.: Defining Co-Borrower Liabilities Under IBC

Doshi Holdings Pvt. Ltd. v. Anand Rathi Global Finance Ltd.: Defining Co-Borrower Liabilities Under IBC

Date: Aug 26, 2021
Doshi Holdings Pvt. Ltd. v. Anand Rathi Global Finance Ltd.: Defining Co-Borrower Liabilities Under IBC Introduction The case of Maitreya Doshi v. Anand Rathi Global Finance Ltd. & Anr adjudicated by...
Affirmation of Liquidator’s Authority to Sell Corporate Debtor as a Going Concern under IBC: Mohan Gems & Jewels Pvt. Ltd. v. Vijay Verma

Affirmation of Liquidator’s Authority to Sell Corporate Debtor as a Going Concern under IBC: Mohan Gems & Jewels Pvt. Ltd. v. Vijay Verma

Date: Aug 25, 2021
Affirmation of Liquidator’s Authority to Sell Corporate Debtor as a Going Concern under IBC 1. Introduction The case Mohan Gems & Jewels Private Limited v. Vijay Verma deliberated upon the authority...
Redefining Insurance Claim Repudiation: G.N. Hallmarking v. National Insurance Company Ltd. Judgment Analysis

Redefining Insurance Claim Repudiation: G.N. Hallmarking v. National Insurance Company Ltd. Judgment Analysis

Date: Aug 24, 2021
Redefining Insurance Claim Repudiation: G.N. Hallmarking v. National Insurance Company Ltd. Introduction The case of G.N. Hallmarking & Refinery Private Limited v. National Insurance Company Ltd.,...
Rejection of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Under Section 7 of IBC: Damayanti Tea Industries vs. M/S Bochapathar Tea Estate Pvt. Ltd.

Rejection of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Under Section 7 of IBC: Damayanti Tea Industries vs. M/S Bochapathar Tea Estate Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Aug 24, 2021
Rejection of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Under Section 7 of IBC: Damayanti Tea Industries vs. M/S Bochapathar Tea Estate Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Damayanti Tea Industries A unit...
CERC Establishes Uniform Annuity Payment Methodology for Change in Law Compensation in Solar Power PPAs

CERC Establishes Uniform Annuity Payment Methodology for Change in Law Compensation in Solar Power PPAs

Date: Aug 21, 2021
CERC Establishes Uniform Annuity Payment Methodology for Change in Law Compensation in Solar Power PPAs Introduction The case of Solar Energy Corporation Of India Limited v. Azure Power Venus Private...
Admissibility of CENVAT Credit for Mine Development Services Under Means Clause Over Exclusions

Admissibility of CENVAT Credit for Mine Development Services Under Means Clause Over Exclusions

Date: Aug 20, 2021
Admissibility of CENVAT Credit for Mine Development Services Under Means Clause Over Exclusions Introduction In the landmark case of Hindustan Zinc Limited v. Commissioner Of CGST, Excise Customs,...
Reaffirming COC's Commercial Discretion in IBC Resolution Plans: Insights from Panch Tatva Promoters Pvt. Ltd. v. GPT Steel Industries Ltd.

Reaffirming COC's Commercial Discretion in IBC Resolution Plans: Insights from Panch Tatva Promoters Pvt. Ltd. v. GPT Steel Industries Ltd.

Date: Aug 19, 2021
Reaffirming COC's Commercial Discretion in IBC Resolution Plans: Insights from Panch Tatva Promoters Pvt. Ltd. v. GPT Steel Industries Ltd. Introduction The case of Panch Tatva Promoters Pvt. Ltd....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert