Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All Tribunals Case Commentaries

Tax Implications of Joint Ventures: Insights from Van Oord Acz BV vs. Authority for Advance Rulings

Tax Implications of Joint Ventures: Insights from Van Oord Acz BV vs. Authority for Advance Rulings

Date: Sep 15, 2000
Tax Implications of Joint Ventures: Insights from Van Oord Acz BV vs. Authority for Advance Rulings Introduction The case of Van Oord Acz Bv vs. Authority For Advance Rulings (2000) presents a...
Court Affirms Forfeiture of Illegally Acquired Property Under SAFEMA in Smt. Fathima v. Competent Authority

Court Affirms Forfeiture of Illegally Acquired Property Under SAFEMA in Smt. Fathima v. Competent Authority

Date: Aug 19, 2000
Court Affirms Forfeiture of Illegally Acquired Property Under SAFEMA in Smt. Fathima v. Competent Authority Introduction The case of Smt. Fathima v. Competent Authority, Chennai (Appellate Tribunal...
Comprehensive Commentary on State Bank Of India v. Competent Authority, Chennai: Establishing the Supremacy of SAFEMA in Foreclosure of Encumbered Properties

Comprehensive Commentary on State Bank Of India v. Competent Authority, Chennai: Establishing the Supremacy of SAFEMA in Foreclosure of Encumbered Properties

Date: Aug 18, 2000
Establishing the Supremacy of SAFEMA in Foreclosure of Encumbered Properties: A Comprehensive Analysis of State Bank Of India v. Competent Authority, Chennai 1. Introduction The case of State Bank Of...
Simultaneous Availment of Modvat Credit and Small Scale Exemption: A Landmark Decision by CESTAT

Simultaneous Availment of Modvat Credit and Small Scale Exemption: A Landmark Decision by CESTAT

Date: Aug 12, 2000
Simultaneous Availment of Modvat Credit and Small Scale Exemption: A Landmark Decision by CESTAT Introduction The case of Franco Italian Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Mumbai-II...
Estimation of Suppressed Income in Block Assessments: Samrat Beer Bar v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Estimation of Suppressed Income in Block Assessments: Samrat Beer Bar v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Jul 22, 2000
Estimation of Suppressed Income in Block Assessments: Samrat Beer Bar v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction The case of Samrat Beer Bar v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax...
Validating Tender Contract Assignments for Deductions under Section 80-IA(4A): Ayush Ajay Construction Ltd. Case Commentary

Validating Tender Contract Assignments for Deductions under Section 80-IA(4A): Ayush Ajay Construction Ltd. Case Commentary

Date: Jul 21, 2000
Validating Tender Contract Assignments for Deductions under Section 80-IA(4A): Ayush Ajay Construction Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer Introduction The case of Ayush Ajay Construction Ltd. v. Income-tax...
CESTAT's Landmark Ruling on Revenue Neutrality and Intention to Evade Duty in Jay Yuhshin Ltd. v. CCE

CESTAT's Landmark Ruling on Revenue Neutrality and Intention to Evade Duty in Jay Yuhshin Ltd. v. CCE

Date: Jul 13, 2000
CESTAT's Landmark Ruling on Revenue Neutrality and Intention to Evade Duty in Jay Yuhshin Ltd. v. CCE Introduction The case of Jay Yuhshin Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, New Delhi...
Exemption Eligibility for Job Workers under Notifications 1/93-C.E. and 214/86-C.E.: Analysis of Desh Rolling Mills v. Commissioner of Central Excise

Exemption Eligibility for Job Workers under Notifications 1/93-C.E. and 214/86-C.E.: Analysis of Desh Rolling Mills v. Commissioner of Central Excise

Date: Jul 4, 2000
Exemption Eligibility for Job Workers under Notifications 1/93-C.E. and 214/86-C.E.: Analysis of Desh Rolling Mills v. Commissioner of Central Excise Introduction The case of Desh Rolling Mills v....
Rail Tech v. Commissioner Of Central Excise: Precedent on CETA Classification and Remedial Measures

Rail Tech v. Commissioner Of Central Excise: Precedent on CETA Classification and Remedial Measures

Date: Jun 9, 2000
Rail Tech v. Commissioner Of Central Excise: Precedent on CETA Classification and Remedial Measures Introduction Rail Tech v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Chandigarh is a landmark judgment...
Enhancing Private Sector Investment in Transmission: CERC’s Landmark Ruling in National Grid International Ltd. v. Union of India

Enhancing Private Sector Investment in Transmission: CERC’s Landmark Ruling in National Grid International Ltd. v. Union of India

Date: May 30, 2000
Enhancing Private Sector Investment in Transmission: CERC’s Landmark Ruling in National Grid International Ltd. v. Union of India Introduction The case of National Grid International Limited v. Union...
Lubricants and Greases Recognized as 'Inputs' under Rule 57A for Modvat Credit: CESTAT Decision in Commissioner Of Custom & C. Ex., Meerut-I v. Modi Rubber Ltd.

Lubricants and Greases Recognized as 'Inputs' under Rule 57A for Modvat Credit: CESTAT Decision in Commissioner Of Custom & C. Ex., Meerut-I v. Modi Rubber Ltd.

Date: May 20, 2000
Lubricants and Greases Recognized as 'Inputs' under Rule 57A for Modvat Credit: CESTAT Decision in Commissioner Of Custom & C. Ex., Meerut-I v. Modi Rubber Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner...
Establishing the Boundaries of Block Assessment and Use of Seized Evidence under Section 158BC: A Detailed Analysis of P.R. Patel v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Establishing the Boundaries of Block Assessment and Use of Seized Evidence under Section 158BC: A Detailed Analysis of P.R. Patel v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: May 9, 2000
Establishing the Boundaries of Block Assessment and Use of Seized Evidence under Section 158BC: A Detailed Analysis of P.R. Patel v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction The case of P.R....
Clarification on 'Buyer' Definition under Section 206C: Naresh Kumar & Co. v. Union of India

Clarification on 'Buyer' Definition under Section 206C: Naresh Kumar & Co. v. Union of India

Date: Feb 23, 2000
Clarification on 'Buyer' Definition under Section 206C: Naresh Kumar & Co. v. Union of India Introduction The case of Naresh Kumar & Co. v. Union of India adjudicated by the Income Tax Appellate...
Mandatory Production of Duplicate Invoices for Modvat Credit: CESTAT Clarifies Central Excise Rules in Commissioner Of C. Ex., New Delhi v. Avis Electronics Pvt. Ltd.

Mandatory Production of Duplicate Invoices for Modvat Credit: CESTAT Clarifies Central Excise Rules in Commissioner Of C. Ex., New Delhi v. Avis Electronics Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Feb 22, 2000
Mandatory Production of Duplicate Invoices for Modvat Credit: CESTAT Clarifies Central Excise Rules in Commissioner Of C. Ex., New Delhi v. Avis Electronics Pvt. Ltd. 1. Introduction The case of...
Shri Mahavir Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. v. DCIT: Landmark Judgment on Section 68 and 80P for Cooperative Societies

Shri Mahavir Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. v. DCIT: Landmark Judgment on Section 68 and 80P for Cooperative Societies

Date: Feb 19, 2000
Shri Mahavir Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax: A Comprehensive Analysis 1. Introduction The case of Shri Mahavir Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. v. Deputy...
Extent of Assessing Officer’s Power to Estimate Undisclosed Income under Chapter XIV-B: Applicability of Section 145

Extent of Assessing Officer’s Power to Estimate Undisclosed Income under Chapter XIV-B: Applicability of Section 145

Date: Jan 28, 2000
Extent of Assessing Officer’s Power to Estimate Undisclosed Income under Chapter XIV-B: Applicability of Section 145 Introduction The case of Khopade Kisanrao Manikrao v. Assistant Commissioner of...
Precedent Established in Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. Anima Investment Ltd.

Precedent Established in Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. Anima Investment Ltd.

Date: Jan 19, 2000
Understanding the Landmark Decision in Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. Anima Investment Ltd. Introduction The case of Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. Anima Investment Ltd. adjudicated...
Tribunal Upholds Principles on Evidentiary Standards in Income Tax Assessments: Prarthana Construction (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Tribunal Upholds Principles on Evidentiary Standards in Income Tax Assessments: Prarthana Construction (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Dec 21, 1999
Tribunal Upholds Principles on Evidentiary Standards in Income Tax Assessments: Prarthana Construction (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction In the landmark case of Prarthana...
CESTAT Establishes Rigorous Standards for Classification and Evidence in Excise Cases: Zarafshan Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh

CESTAT Establishes Rigorous Standards for Classification and Evidence in Excise Cases: Zarafshan Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh

Date: Dec 17, 1999
CESTAT Establishes Rigorous Standards for Classification and Evidence in Excise Cases: Zarafshan Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh Introduction In the landmark case of...
Unexplained Investments and the Necessity of Corroborative Evidence: Insights from Jagdamba Rice Mills v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Unexplained Investments and the Necessity of Corroborative Evidence: Insights from Jagdamba Rice Mills v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Oct 30, 1999
Unexplained Investments and the Necessity of Corroborative Evidence: Insights from Jagdamba Rice Mills v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction The case of Jagdamba Rice Mills v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert