Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All Tribunals Case Commentaries

Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeals: Insights from Joint Commissioner of Income-tax v. Tractors & Farm Equipments Ltd.

Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeals: Insights from Joint Commissioner of Income-tax v. Tractors & Farm Equipments Ltd.

Date: Aug 12, 2006
Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeals: Insights from Joint Commissioner of Income-tax v. Tractors & Farm Equipments Ltd. Introduction The case of Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, Special Range I,...
Rammapati Exports v. Commissioner Of Customs (Port), Kolkata: Establishing the Finality of Tax Assessments in DEPB Claims

Rammapati Exports v. Commissioner Of Customs (Port), Kolkata: Establishing the Finality of Tax Assessments in DEPB Claims

Date: Aug 8, 2006
Rammapati Exports v. Commissioner Of Customs (Port), Kolkata: Establishing the Finality of Tax Assessments in DEPB Claims Introduction Rammapati Exports v. Commissioner Of Customs (Port), Kolkata is...
PUDA vs CIT: Defining Charitable Status for Development Authorities

PUDA vs CIT: Defining Charitable Status for Development Authorities

Date: Aug 2, 2006
PUDA vs CIT: Defining Charitable Status for Development Authorities Introduction The case of Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority (PUDA) v. Commissioner of Income-Tax-1, Chandigarh serves as...
Clarification on Tax Deduction at Source for 'Interest Accrued but not Due': IDBI v. Income-tax Officer, City III (Mumbai)

Clarification on Tax Deduction at Source for 'Interest Accrued but not Due': IDBI v. Income-tax Officer, City III (Mumbai)

Date: Aug 1, 2006
Clarification on Tax Deduction at Source for 'Interest Accrued but not Due': IDBI v. Income-tax Officer, City III (Mumbai) Introduction The case of Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) v....
Revenue Treatment of VRS Expenditure Affirmed in PI Industries Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Revenue Treatment of VRS Expenditure Affirmed in PI Industries Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Date: Jul 29, 2006
Revenue Treatment of VRS Expenditure Affirmed in PI Industries Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Introduction The case of PI Industries Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax,...
Interpretation of Section 2(22)(e) Revisited: Deemed Dividend and Current Accounts Between Related Parties - NH Securities Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Interpretation of Section 2(22)(e) Revisited: Deemed Dividend and Current Accounts Between Related Parties - NH Securities Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Jul 28, 2006
Interpretation of Section 2(22)(e) Revisited: Deemed Dividend and Current Accounts Between Related Parties NH Securities Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Cent. Cir. 40, Mumbai Court: Income...
Admission of Additional Evidence under Rule 46A: Shahrukh Khan v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Admission of Additional Evidence under Rule 46A: Shahrukh Khan v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Jul 21, 2006
Admission of Additional Evidence under Rule 46A: Shahrukh Khan v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction The case of Shahrukh Khan v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Spl. Rg. 21, Mumbai...
Ketan Parekh v. Securities & Exchange Board Of India: A Comprehensive Commentary

Ketan Parekh v. Securities & Exchange Board Of India: A Comprehensive Commentary

Date: Jul 15, 2006
Judicial Clarification on Market Manipulation and Corporate Control in Ketan Parekh v. SEBI Introduction The case of Ketan Parekh v. Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) adjudicated by the...
Confidentiality of Annual Confidential Reports Under RTI Act: Gopal Kumar v. DGW Case Analysis

Confidentiality of Annual Confidential Reports Under RTI Act: Gopal Kumar v. DGW Case Analysis

Date: Jul 14, 2006
Confidentiality of Annual Confidential Reports Under RTI Act: Gopal Kumar v. DGW Case Analysis Introduction The case of Gopal Kumar v. DGW, E-In-C's Branch, Army Headquarters, New Delhi And Another...
Strict Interpretation of Section 80-IB(10): Commercial Components and Distance Criteria in Housing Projects

Strict Interpretation of Section 80-IB(10): Commercial Components and Distance Criteria in Housing Projects

Date: Jul 11, 2006
Strict Interpretation of Section 80-IB(10): Commercial Components and Distance Criteria in Housing Projects Introduction The case of Laukik Developers v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-3,...
Assessment of Drawback Claims and FOB Valuation in Ajay Apparels v. Commissioner of Customs

Assessment of Drawback Claims and FOB Valuation in Ajay Apparels v. Commissioner of Customs

Date: Jul 11, 2006
Assessment of Drawback Claims and FOB Valuation in Ajay Apparels v. Commissioner of Customs Introduction The case of Ajay Apparels v. Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata adjudicated by the CESTAT...
Ensuring Fair and Accurate Customs Valuation: Tech Tronix India v. Commissioner Of Customs, Kolkata-I

Ensuring Fair and Accurate Customs Valuation: Tech Tronix India v. Commissioner Of Customs, Kolkata-I

Date: Jul 5, 2006
Ensuring Fair and Accurate Customs Valuation: Tech Tronix India v. Commissioner Of Customs, Kolkata-I Introduction The case of Tech Tronix India v. Commissioner Of Customs, (Port), Kolkata-I dealt...
Reaffirming Transaction Value in Customs Valuation: Sony Impex v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Customs

Reaffirming Transaction Value in Customs Valuation: Sony Impex v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Customs

Date: Jul 5, 2006
Reaffirming Transaction Value in Customs Valuation: Sony Impex v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Customs Introduction The case of Sony Impex v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Customs adjudicated by...
Income Tax Liability and TDS Obligations in International Agency Agreements: Insights from Rajiv Malhotra v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Income Tax Liability and TDS Obligations in International Agency Agreements: Insights from Rajiv Malhotra v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Jul 4, 2006
Income Tax Liability and TDS Obligations in International Agency Agreements: Insights from Rajiv Malhotra v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of Rajiv Malhotra v. Commissioner Of...
Retention Money and Income Accrual: Insights from Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. Spirax Marshall Ltd.

Retention Money and Income Accrual: Insights from Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. Spirax Marshall Ltd.

Date: Jul 1, 2006
Retention Money and Income Accrual: Insights from Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. Spirax Marshall Ltd. Introduction The case of Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, SR-3, Pune v. Spirax Marshall...
Reopening of Tax Assessment Under Section 147: A Landmark Judgment in Indian Syntans Investments (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Reopening of Tax Assessment Under Section 147: A Landmark Judgment in Indian Syntans Investments (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Jul 1, 2006
Reopening of Tax Assessment Under Section 147: A Landmark Judgment in Indian Syntans Investments (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction The case of Deputy Commissioner of...
Enforceability of Multiple Guarantees and Interest Rates in Loan Recovery: Canara Bank v. S.R.M. Enterprises

Enforceability of Multiple Guarantees and Interest Rates in Loan Recovery: Canara Bank v. S.R.M. Enterprises

Date: Jun 17, 2006
Enforceability of Multiple Guarantees and Interest Rates in Loan Recovery: Canara Bank v. S.R.M. Enterprises Introduction The case of Canara Bank v. S.R.M. Enterprises adjudicated by the Debts...
Establishing the 'Reason to Believe' Standard in Reassessment Proceedings under Section 148: Insights from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Decision in Income-tax Officer vs. Smt. Gurinder Kaur

Establishing the 'Reason to Believe' Standard in Reassessment Proceedings under Section 148: Insights from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Decision in Income-tax Officer vs. Smt. Gurinder Kaur

Date: Jun 17, 2006
Establishing the 'Reason to Believe' Standard in Reassessment Proceedings under Section 148: Insights from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Decision in Income-tax Officer vs. Smt. Gurinder Kaur...
Date of Transfer in Development Agreements: Insights from Assistant Commissioner v. Geetadevi Pasari

Date of Transfer in Development Agreements: Insights from Assistant Commissioner v. Geetadevi Pasari

Date: Jun 10, 2006
Date of Transfer in Development Agreements: Insights from Assistant Commissioner v. Geetadevi Pasari Introduction The case of Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. Mrs. Geetadevi Pasari adjudicated...
Depreciation on Vehicles: Distinction between Business Use and Hire Use – Sridevi Steel & Cement Stores v. I.T.O.

Depreciation on Vehicles: Distinction between Business Use and Hire Use – Sridevi Steel & Cement Stores v. I.T.O.

Date: May 20, 2006
Depreciation on Vehicles: Distinction between Business Use and Hire Use – Sridevi Steel & Cement Stores v. I.T.O. Introduction The case of Sridevi Steel & Cement Stores v. Income-tax Officer, Ward-1,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert