Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All Tribunals Case Commentaries

Strengthening Burden of Proof under Section 68: Insights from M/S Agrawal Coal Corp. Ltd. v. Addl. CIT Indore

Strengthening Burden of Proof under Section 68: Insights from M/S Agrawal Coal Corp. Ltd. v. Addl. CIT Indore

Date: Nov 1, 2011
Strengthening Burden of Proof under Section 68: Insights from M/S Agrawal Coal Corp. Ltd. v. Addl. CIT Indore Introduction The case of M/S Agrawal Coal Corporation P. Ltd. Indore v. Addl....
Disallowance of Excise Duty Deduction Under Section 43B in Chetna Zarda Company v. CIT

Disallowance of Excise Duty Deduction Under Section 43B in Chetna Zarda Company v. CIT

Date: Oct 29, 2011
Disallowance of Excise Duty Deduction Under Section 43B in Chetna Zarda Company v. CIT Introduction In the landmark case of Chetna Zarda Company v. Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT), adjudicated by...
Revised Returns and Depreciation Method Options: Insights from CIT v. Ushdev International Ltd. Judgment

Revised Returns and Depreciation Method Options: Insights from CIT v. Ushdev International Ltd. Judgment

Date: Oct 26, 2011
Revised Returns and Depreciation Method Options: Insights from CIT v. Ushdev International Ltd. Judgment Introduction The case CIT v. Ushdev International Ltd. adjudicated by the Income Tax Appellate...
Amway India v. CIT: Clarifying Leasehold Improvement Expenses and Section 14A Disallowance

Amway India v. CIT: Clarifying Leasehold Improvement Expenses and Section 14A Disallowance

Date: Oct 22, 2011
Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT: Clarifying Leasehold Improvement Expenses and Section 14A Disallowance Introduction The case of Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income...
Reaffirming Regulatory Approval and Contractual Obligations in Power Purchase Agreements: Rithwik Energy v. KPTCL

Reaffirming Regulatory Approval and Contractual Obligations in Power Purchase Agreements: Rithwik Energy v. KPTCL

Date: Oct 22, 2011
Reaffirming Regulatory Approval and Contractual Obligations in Power Purchase Agreements: Rithwik Energy Generation Pvt Ltd v. Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. Introduction The case of...
Clarification on Applicable TDS Provisions: Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. S.K. Tekriwal

Clarification on Applicable TDS Provisions: Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. S.K. Tekriwal

Date: Oct 22, 2011
Clarification on Applicable TDS Provisions: Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. S.K. Tekriwal Introduction The case of Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-33, Kolkata v. S.K. Tekriwal deals...
Penalization Under Section 271(1)(c) Requires Clear Evidence of Concealment: Insights from Ito v. Bhagwan Das Thawarni

Penalization Under Section 271(1)(c) Requires Clear Evidence of Concealment: Insights from Ito v. Bhagwan Das Thawarni

Date: Oct 15, 2011
Penalization Under Section 271(1)(c) Requires Clear Evidence of Concealment: Insights from Ito v. Bhagwan Das Thawarni Introduction Ito v. Bhagwan Das Thawarni is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Substantiation of Business Expenses and Treatment of Amalgamated Companies' Losses: Comprehensive Commentary on A.C.I.T Circle-2, Alwar v. M/S Vijay Solvex Ltd.

Substantiation of Business Expenses and Treatment of Amalgamated Companies' Losses: Comprehensive Commentary on A.C.I.T Circle-2, Alwar v. M/S Vijay Solvex Ltd.

Date: Oct 15, 2011
Substantiation of Business Expenses and Treatment of Amalgamated Companies' Losses: Comprehensive Commentary on A.C.I.T Circle-2, Alwar v. M/S Vijay Solvex Ltd. Introduction The case A.C.I.T...
CESTAT Establishes Applicability of Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 to Supplies Made to 100% EOUs: Implications for Cash Refunds

CESTAT Establishes Applicability of Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 to Supplies Made to 100% EOUs: Implications for Cash Refunds

Date: Oct 14, 2011
CESTAT Establishes Applicability of Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 to Supplies Made to 100% EOUs: Implications for Cash Refunds Introduction The case of Elcomponics Sales Pvt. Ltd. v....
ITAT Decision in Guy Carpenter & Co. Ltd. v. Adit: Clarifying the Scope of Fees for Technical Services under Indian DTAA with UK

ITAT Decision in Guy Carpenter & Co. Ltd. v. Adit: Clarifying the Scope of Fees for Technical Services under Indian DTAA with UK

Date: Oct 1, 2011
ITAT Decision in Guy Carpenter & Co. Ltd. v. Adit: Clarifying the Scope of Fees for Technical Services under Indian DTAA with UK Introduction The case of Guy Carpenter & Co. Ltd., C/O Price Water...
Clarification on Sales Tax Excess and Excise Duty Liability for Public Sector Undertakings: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise

Clarification on Sales Tax Excess and Excise Duty Liability for Public Sector Undertakings: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise

Date: Sep 30, 2011
Clarification on Sales Tax Excess and Excise Duty Liability for Public Sector Undertakings Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad Court: Central Excise and Service...
Valuation of Job-Worked Goods: Rolastar Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Daman

Valuation of Job-Worked Goods: Rolastar Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Daman

Date: Sep 30, 2011
Valuation of Job-Worked Goods: Rolastar Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Daman Introduction The case of Rolastar Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Daman was adjudicated by the...
Deductibility of Portfolio Management Fees in Capital Gains: The ITAT's Stance in Homi K. Bhabha v. Ito

Deductibility of Portfolio Management Fees in Capital Gains: The ITAT's Stance in Homi K. Bhabha v. Ito

Date: Sep 29, 2011
Deductibility of Portfolio Management Fees in Capital Gains: The ITAT's Stance in Homi K. Bhabha v. Ito Introduction The case of Homi K. Bhabha v. Ito adjudicated by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal...
Saif Ali Khan v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax: Precedent on Reopening Assessments

Saif Ali Khan v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax: Precedent on Reopening Assessments

Date: Sep 24, 2011
Saif Ali Khan v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax: Precedent on Reopening Assessments Introduction The case of Saif Ali Khan Mansurali v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax addresses...
Clubbing of Separate Legal Entities for Central Excise Duty Rejected: CESTAT's Landmark Decision in Balsara Hygiene Products Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Vapi

Clubbing of Separate Legal Entities for Central Excise Duty Rejected: CESTAT's Landmark Decision in Balsara Hygiene Products Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Vapi

Date: Sep 21, 2011
Clubbing of Separate Legal Entities for Central Excise Duty Rejected: CESTAT's Landmark Decision in Balsara Hygiene Products Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Vapi Introduction The case of Balsara...
CESTAT Reinforces Substantial Compliance for Service Tax Rebate under Export of Services Rules; Limits Penalty Imposition

CESTAT Reinforces Substantial Compliance for Service Tax Rebate under Export of Services Rules; Limits Penalty Imposition

Date: Sep 14, 2011
CESTAT Reinforces Substantial Compliance for Service Tax Rebate under Export of Services Rules; Limits Penalty Imposition Introduction The case of M/S Convergys India Services Pvt. Limited vs. CST,...
Dresser Rand India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT: Pioneering Rulings on Cost Contribution Arrangements and Transfer Pricing

Dresser Rand India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT: Pioneering Rulings on Cost Contribution Arrangements and Transfer Pricing

Date: Sep 8, 2011
Dresser Rand India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT: Pioneering Rulings on Cost Contribution Arrangements and Transfer Pricing 1. Introduction The case of Dresser Rand India Pvt. Ltd. v. Comptroller and Auditor...
Sujana Metal Products Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex.: Redefining Export for SEZ Developers under Cenvat Credit Rules

Sujana Metal Products Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex.: Redefining Export for SEZ Developers under Cenvat Credit Rules

Date: Sep 6, 2011
Sujana Metal Products Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex.: Redefining Export for SEZ Developers under Cenvat Credit Rules Introduction The case of Sujana Metal Products Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex.,...
CESTAT Affirms Strict Enforcement of Foreign Exchange Regulations: Sidhharth Shankar Roy v. Commissioner Of Customs, Mumbai

CESTAT Affirms Strict Enforcement of Foreign Exchange Regulations: Sidhharth Shankar Roy v. Commissioner Of Customs, Mumbai

Date: Aug 31, 2011
CESTAT Affirms Strict Enforcement of Foreign Exchange Regulations: Sidhharth Shankar Roy v. Commissioner Of Customs, Mumbai Introduction The case of Sidhharth Shankar Roy v. Commissioner Of Customs,...
Misapplication of Section 139(1) in Reassessment: Insights from Cebon India Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Misapplication of Section 139(1) in Reassessment: Insights from Cebon India Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Aug 31, 2011
Misapplication of Section 139(1) in Reassessment: Insights from Cebon India Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction Cebon India Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert