Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All Tribunals Case Commentaries

CESTAT Upholds Rigorous Standards for Clandestine Removal Allegations in Central Excise Cases

CESTAT Upholds Rigorous Standards for Clandestine Removal Allegations in Central Excise Cases

Date: Mar 23, 2016
CESTAT Upholds Rigorous Standards for Clandestine Removal Allegations in Central Excise Cases Introduction The case of Shree Sidhbali Ispat Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur revolves...
Tribunal Rules IUC Payments Do Not Constitute Fee for Technical Services or Royalty: Bharti Airtel v. Ito

Tribunal Rules IUC Payments Do Not Constitute Fee for Technical Services or Royalty: Bharti Airtel v. Ito

Date: Mar 18, 2016
Tribunal Rules IUC Payments Do Not Constitute Fee for Technical Services or Royalty: Bharti Airtel v. Ito Introduction The case of Bharti Airtel Limited v. Ito adjudicated by the Income Tax Appellate...
Interplay Between Section 15A and Section 15J of the SEBI Act: Insights from Siddharth Chaturvedi v. SEBI

Interplay Between Section 15A and Section 15J of the SEBI Act: Insights from Siddharth Chaturvedi v. SEBI

Date: Mar 15, 2016
Interplay Between Section 15A and Section 15J of the SEBI Act: Insights from Siddharth Chaturvedi v. SEBI Introduction The case of Siddharth Chaturvedi v. Securities and Exchange Board of India...
Clarifying the Application of Section 153A in Income Tax Assessments: Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-4 v. Saumya Construction (P.) Ltd.

Clarifying the Application of Section 153A in Income Tax Assessments: Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-4 v. Saumya Construction (P.) Ltd.

Date: Mar 15, 2016
Clarifying the Application of Section 153A in Income Tax Assessments: Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-4 v. Saumya Construction (P.) Ltd. Introduction The case of Principal Commissioner of...
Consumer Rights Reinforced: Arbitration Clauses Do Not Bar Redressal Under Consumer Protection Act

Consumer Rights Reinforced: Arbitration Clauses Do Not Bar Redressal Under Consumer Protection Act

Date: Mar 10, 2016
Consumer Rights Reinforced: Arbitration Clauses Do Not Bar Redressal Under Consumer Protection Act Introduction The case of Sh. Aditya Sharma vs. DLF Universal Limited adjudicated by the State...
Medplus Health Services P. Ltd. v. Ito: Clarifying Fair Market Value Under Section 56(2)(viia)

Medplus Health Services P. Ltd. v. Ito: Clarifying Fair Market Value Under Section 56(2)(viia)

Date: Mar 9, 2016
Medplus Health Services P. Ltd. v. Ito: Clarifying Fair Market Value Under Section 56(2)(viia) Introduction The case of Medplus Health Services P. Ltd. v. Ito adjudicated by the Income Tax Appellate...
CERC Upholds Contractual Risk Allocation in GKEL v. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.; Permits Tariff Adjustments for Service Tax Increases

CERC Upholds Contractual Risk Allocation in GKEL v. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.; Permits Tariff Adjustments for Service Tax Increases

Date: Mar 8, 2016
CERC Upholds Contractual Risk Allocation in GKEL v. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.; Permits Tariff Adjustments for Service Tax Increases Introduction The case of GMR-Kamalanga Energy Limited...
Enhanced Evidentiary Procedures Under Section 9D: Insights from Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I v. Kuber Tobacco India Ltd.

Enhanced Evidentiary Procedures Under Section 9D: Insights from Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I v. Kuber Tobacco India Ltd.

Date: Mar 5, 2016
Enhanced Evidentiary Procedures Under Section 9D: Insights from Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I v. Kuber Tobacco India Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I v....
Kamlesh Mundra v. Ito: Reinforcing Burden of Proof in Disallowing Long-Term Capital Gains

Kamlesh Mundra v. Ito: Reinforcing Burden of Proof in Disallowing Long-Term Capital Gains

Date: Mar 5, 2016
Kamlesh Mundra v. Ito: Reinforcing Burden of Proof in Disallowing Long-Term Capital Gains Introduction The case of Kamlesh Mundra v. Ito adjudicated by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on...
Retrospective Application of Section 12A: SNDP Yogam Cochin v. Assistant Director of IT (Exemption)

Retrospective Application of Section 12A: SNDP Yogam Cochin v. Assistant Director of IT (Exemption)

Date: Mar 2, 2016
Retrospective Application of Section 12A: SNDP Yogam Cochin v. Assistant Director of IT (Exemption) Introduction The case of SNDP Yogam, Cochin v. Assistant Director of IT (Exemption), Cochin...
Reversing Wrongfully Availed Cenvat Credit Before Utilization: No Interest Liability Arises

Reversing Wrongfully Availed Cenvat Credit Before Utilization: No Interest Liability Arises

Date: Mar 1, 2016
Reversing Wrongfully Availed Cenvat Credit Before Utilization: No Interest Liability Arises Introduction The case of J.K. Tyre & Industries Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Mysore...
Judgment in Jagran Prakashan Ltd. v. D.C.I.T.: Establishing Precedents on Allowability of Business Expenditures

Judgment in Jagran Prakashan Ltd. v. D.C.I.T.: Establishing Precedents on Allowability of Business Expenditures

Date: Mar 1, 2016
Judgment in Jagran Prakashan Ltd. v. D.C.I.T.: Establishing Precedents on Allowability of Business Expenditures Introduction The case of Jagran Prakashan Ltd., Sarvodaya Nagar, Kanpur v. D.C.I.T,...
Waiver of Basement Exclusion Clause in Texco Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. Tata AIG: A New Precedent in Insurance Law

Waiver of Basement Exclusion Clause in Texco Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. Tata AIG: A New Precedent in Insurance Law

Date: Feb 26, 2016
Waiver of Basement Exclusion Clause in Texco Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. Tata AIG: A New Precedent in Insurance Law Introduction The case of Texco Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. Tata AIG General Insurance Company...
Judicial Clarification on Verification of Sundry Creditors and Estimation of Gross Profit under Section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Anil Kumar & Co.

Judicial Clarification on Verification of Sundry Creditors and Estimation of Gross Profit under Section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Anil Kumar & Co.

Date: Feb 26, 2016
Judicial Clarification on Verification of Sundry Creditors and Estimation of Gross Profit under Section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Anil Kumar & Co. Introduction The...
Reopening of Completed Tax Assessments Without Allegation of Non-Disclosure: Apeejay Education Society v. ITAT

Reopening of Completed Tax Assessments Without Allegation of Non-Disclosure: Apeejay Education Society v. ITAT

Date: Feb 26, 2016
Reopening of Completed Tax Assessments Without Allegation of Non-Disclosure: Apeejay Education Society v. ITAT Introduction The case of Apeejay Education Society, Jalandhar v. The Assistant...
Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses in Consumer Disputes: Taneja Developers & Infrastructure Ltd. v. Gurpreet Singh

Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses in Consumer Disputes: Taneja Developers & Infrastructure Ltd. v. Gurpreet Singh

Date: Feb 26, 2016
Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses in Consumer Disputes: Taneja Developers & Infrastructure Ltd. v. Gurpreet Singh Introduction The case of Taneja Developers & Infrastructure Ltd. v. Gurpreet Singh...
Establishing 'Pure Agent' Status in Cost-Sharing Arrangements: Reliance ADA Group Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of S.T., Mumbai-IV

Establishing 'Pure Agent' Status in Cost-Sharing Arrangements: Reliance ADA Group Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of S.T., Mumbai-IV

Date: Feb 23, 2016
Establishing 'Pure Agent' Status in Cost-Sharing Arrangements: Reliance ADA Group Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of S.T., Mumbai-IV Introduction The case of Reliance ADA Group Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of...
Chand Berry v. BCL Homes Ltd.: Affirming Consumer Jurisdiction Over Arbitration Clauses in Real Estate Transactions

Chand Berry v. BCL Homes Ltd.: Affirming Consumer Jurisdiction Over Arbitration Clauses in Real Estate Transactions

Date: Feb 20, 2016
Chand Berry v. BCL Homes Ltd.: Affirming Consumer Jurisdiction Over Arbitration Clauses in Real Estate Transactions Introduction Chand Berry v. BCL Homes Ltd. is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Ensuring Natural Justice: Mandatory Independent Inquiry in Tax Assessments

Ensuring Natural Justice: Mandatory Independent Inquiry in Tax Assessments

Date: Feb 11, 2016
Ensuring Natural Justice: Mandatory Independent Inquiry in Tax Assessments Introduction The case of Ito v. Softline Creations (P) Ltd. adjudicated by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on February 10,...
Strict Liability of Real Estate Marketers for Unapproved Projects: M/s Emerging India Real Assets P Ltd. v. Kamer Chand

Strict Liability of Real Estate Marketers for Unapproved Projects: M/s Emerging India Real Assets P Ltd. v. Kamer Chand

Date: Feb 10, 2016
Strict Liability of Real Estate Marketers for Unapproved Projects: M/s Emerging India Real Assets P Ltd. v. Kamer Chand Introduction The case of M/s Emerging India Real Assets P Limited v. Kamer...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.