Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

BERLIN MILLS COMPANY V. POOLE Trs., GERRISH a., Claimants.

A written acceptance is essential, under Gen. Laws, c. 249, s. 48, to the validity against creditors of an order for future wages.

CARPENTER, J.

The trustees must be charged. G. L., c. 249, s. 48; Thompson v. Smith, 57 N.H. 306. The order is for wages to be earned in the future, and by the express language of the statute an acceptance in writing is made essential to its validity. Whether, in analogy to the doctrine respecting the registry of deeds, notice to the creditor of an order conforming to the requirements of the statute would be equivalent to filing a copy with the town-clerk need not now be determined.

Trustees charged.

CLARK, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COMPANY v. POOLE
(Dec 1, 1882)