Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CHOUTEAU et al. v. CHOUTEAU

APPEAL AND ERROR — Time of Taking Appeal — Ind. Ter. Procedure. Six months was the time within which a writ of error or appeal could be taken subsequent to March 3, 1905, to review a judgment of the United States Court of the Indian Territory in the Court of Appeals of said territory.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

WILLIAMS, J.

The order from which the writ of error was sued out was made and entered on the 9th day of May, 1906, and the writ allowed on the 30th day of April, A.D. 1907.

The defendant in error moves to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the same was not prosecuted within six months from the time of the rendition of the judgment and the entering of the order sought to be appealed from. This question has been not only by this court, but also by the United States Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory, and of the Eighth Circuit, decided favorably to the contention of the defendant in error. Porter et al. v. Brook, 21 Okla. 885, 97 P. 645; Moberly v. Roth et al., 23 Okla. 856, 102 P. 182; Friend et al. v. Roth et al., 23 Okla. 864, 102 P. 185; Friend et al. v. Roth et al., 23 Okla. 866, 102 P. 186; Bickford v. Bruce et al., 21 Okla. 892, 97 P. 648; Utterback v. Rock Island Plow Co., 22 Okla. 263, 97 P. 649; In re Terrell's Estate, 6 Ind. T. 412, 98 S.W. 143; Lewis et al. v. Sittel, 7 Ind. T. 602, 104 S.W. 850; Id., 165 Fed. 157, 91 C. C. A. 191.

The appeal is dismissed.

Kane, C. J., and Dunn and Hayes, JJ., concur; Turner, J., not participating.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CHOUTEAU ET AL. v. CHOUTEAU
(Jan 11, 1910)