Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UTTERBACK v. ROCK ISLAND PLOW CO.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Time of Taking Appeal. Under Act Cong. March 3, 1905, c. 1479, sec. 12, 33 Stat. 1081 (U.S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 208), providing that appeals and writs of error shall be taken from the United States Courts in the Indian Territory to the United States Court of Appeals of said territory in the same manner that cases are taken by appeal and writ of error from the Circuit Courts of the United States to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, a writ of error must be sued out within six months after the entry of the judgment sought to be reviewed.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

HAYES, J.

A motion to dismiss has been filed by defendant in error in which he alleges several grounds for dismissal. One ground alleged is that no writ of error was sued out by plaintiff in error within six months from the date of the entry of the judgment in the trial court. Under the rule announced by this court in Edward Porter et al. v. Eck E. Brook, 21 Okla. 885, 97 P. 645, and in H. K. Bickford v. Stanley R. Bruce et al. 21 Okla. 892, 97 P. 648 the motion to dismiss in this case should be sustained upon this ground, and it is unnecessary to notice the other grounds set out in the motion.

The motion to dismiss is sustained.

Williams, C. J., and Dunn, Kane and Turner, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UTTERBACK v. ROCK ISLAND PLOW CO
(Sep 16, 1908)