Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MILLER LUMBER CO. v. SWINK MERCANTILE CO.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Failure to File Briefs. Where plaintiff in error fails to file briefs, as required by rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Syllabus by Brewer, C.)

Opinion by BREWER, C.

The petition in error and transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court January 23, 1911. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the cause, as required by rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court. The petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 P. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 P. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MILLER LUMBER CO. v. SWINK MERCANTILE CO
(Feb 18, 1913)