Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MADDIN v. McCORMICK et al.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Briefs — Dismissal. Syllabus same as in Leavitt v. Commercial Nat. Bank, 26 Okla. 164, 109 P. 71.

WILLIAMS, J.

The petition in error and case-made attached were filed in this court May 4, 1910. On November 4, 1910, defendants in error filed motion to dismiss the appeal on the following grounds:

(1) Case-made not served in time.

(2) Petition in error not filed in time.

(3) No brief filed pursuant to rule 7 of this court.

No response has been made to said motion to dismiss.

It is not essential to pass on the first two grounds, as the third ground is sufficient, the plaintiff in error neither having filed his brief in accordance with said rule 7 nor having made application for additional time or for permission to file typewritten briefs. Leavitt et al. v. Commercial Nat. Bank, 26 Okla. 164, 109 P. 71; Monnington v. Cotteral, 26 Okla. 817, 110 P. 632; Cooper v. Chapman, 26 Okla. 600, 110 P. 722.

All the Justices concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MADDIN v. McCORMICK ET AL
(Jan 10, 1911)