Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number No. 3625 Attorney(S) Tom W. Neal, for plaintiff in Hale Lunsford, for defendant in Judges Opinion by BREWER, C. See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. TERRY v. COKER APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Dismissal. Where plaintiffs in error file no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. (Syllabus by Brewer, C.) Opinion by BREWER, C. The petition in error and transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court February 23, 1912. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the cause, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi). The petition in error shall therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 P. 200, and cases cited. By the Court: It is so ordered.