Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Leo Franklin FORESTER, Appellant.

PER CURIAM:

A trial to the District Court, without a jury, upon an eight-count information resulted in each instance in the conviction of Leo Franklin Forester for violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, §§ 503(b)(1)(B) and 301(k), 21 U.S.C. § 353(b)(1)(B) and 331(k). Offering no evidence for himself or objection to the prosecution's proof, defendant stood in the trial court upon a motion to dismiss the information for the unconstitutionality of § 503(b)(1)(B) because of vagueness and uncertainty. The Court denied the motion, adjudged Forester guilty and sentenced him to one year imprisonment, with suspension of the last six months during probation of five years. We find no error in the trial or judgment. United States v. 2600 State Drugs, Inc., 235 F.2d 913 (7 Cir. 1956), cert. den. 352 U.S. 848, 77 S.Ct. 68, 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956).

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. FORESTER
(May 20, 1965)