(g) Regulation of combination products
(1)
(A) The Secretary shall, in accordance with this subsection, assign a primary agency center to regulate products that constitute a combination of a drug, device, or biological product.
(B) The Secretary shall conduct the premarket review of any combination product under a single application, whenever appropriate.
(C) For purposes of this subsection, the term “primary mode of action” means the single mode of action of a combination product expected to make the greatest contribution to the overall intended therapeutic effects of the combination product.
(D)
The Secretary shall determine the primary mode of action of the combination product. If the Secretary determines that the primary mode of action is that of—
(i) a drug (other than a biological product), the agency center charged with premarket review of drugs shall have primary jurisdiction;
(ii) a device, the agency center charged with premarket review of devices shall have primary jurisdiction; or
(iii) a biological product, the agency center charged with premarket review of biological products shall have primary jurisdiction.
(E) In determining the primary mode of action of a combination product, the Secretary shall not determine that the primary mode of action is that of a drug or biological product solely because the combination product has any chemical action within or on the human body.
(F)
If a sponsor of a combination product disagrees with the determination under subparagraph (D)—
(i) such sponsor may request, and the Secretary shall provide, a substantive rationale to such sponsor that references scientific evidence provided by the sponsor and any other scientific evidence relied upon by the Secretary to support such determination; and
(ii)
(I) the sponsor of the combination product may propose one or more studies (which may be nonclinical, clinical, or both) to establish the relevance, if any, of the chemical action in achieving the primary mode of action of such product;
(II) if the sponsor proposes any such studies, the Secretary and the sponsor of such product shall collaborate and seek to reach agreement, within a reasonable time of such proposal, not to exceed 90 calendar days, on the design of such studies; and
(III) if an agreement is reached under subclause (II) and the sponsor conducts one or more of such studies, the Secretary shall consider the data resulting from any such study when reevaluating the determination of the primary mode of action of such product, and unless and until such reevaluation has occurred and the Secretary issues a new determination, the determination of the Secretary under subparagraph (D) shall remain in effect.
(2)
(A)
(i) To establish clarity and certainty for the sponsor, the sponsor of a combination product may request a meeting on such combination product. If the Secretary concludes that a determination of the primary mode of action pursuant to paragraph (1)(D) is necessary, the sponsor may request such meeting only after the Secretary makes such determination. If the sponsor submits a written meeting request, the Secretary shall, not later than 75 calendar days after receiving such request, meet with the sponsor of such combination product.
(ii)
A meeting under clause (i) may—
(I) address the standards and requirements for market approval or clearance of the combination product;
(II) address other issues relevant to such combination product, such as requirements related to postmarket modification of such combination product and good manufacturing practices applicable to such combination product; and
(III) identify elements under subclauses (I) and (II) that may be more appropriate for discussion and agreement with the Secretary at a later date given that scientific or other information is not available, or agreement is otherwise not feasible regarding such elements, at the time a request for such meeting is made.
(iii) Any agreement under this subparagraph shall be in writing and made part of the administrative record by the Secretary.
(iv)
Any such agreement shall remain in effect, except—
(I) upon the written agreement of the Secretary and the sponsor or applicant; or
(II) pursuant to a decision by the director of the reviewing division of the primary agency center, or a person more senior than such director, in consultation with consulting centers and the Office, as appropriate, that an issue essential to determining whether the standard for market clearance or other applicable standard under this chapter or the Public Health Service Act [
42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.] applicable to the combination product has been identified since the agreement was reached, or that deviating from the agreement is otherwise justifiable based on scientific evidence, for public health reasons.
(3) For purposes of conducting the premarket review of a combination product that contains an approved constituent part described in paragraph (4), the Secretary may require that the sponsor of such combination product submit to the Secretary only data or information that the Secretary determines is necessary to meet the standard for clearance or approval, as applicable, under this chapter or the Public Health Service Act, including any incremental risks and benefits posed by such combination product, using a risk-based approach and taking into account any prior finding of safety and effectiveness or substantial equivalence for the approved constituent part relied upon by the applicant in accordance with paragraph (5).
(4)
For purposes of paragraph (3), an approved constituent part is—
(A) a drug constituent part of a combination product being reviewed in a single application or request under section 360e, 360(k), or 360c(f)(2) of this title (submitted in accordance with paragraph (5)), that is an approved drug, provided such application or request complies with paragraph (5);
(B) a device constituent part approved under
section 360e of this title that is referenced by the sponsor and that is available for use by the Secretary under
section 360j(h)(4) of this title; or
(C) any constituent part that was previously approved, cleared, or classified under section 355, 360(k), 360c(f)(2), or 360e of this title for which the sponsor has a right of reference or any constituent part that is a nonprescription drug, as defined in
section 379aa(a)(2) of this title.
(5)
(A)
If an application is submitted under section 360e or 360(k) of this title or a request is submitted under
section 360c(f)(2) of this title, consistent with any determination made under paragraph (1)(D), for a combination product containing as a constituent part an approved drug—
(i) the application or request shall include the certification or statement described in
section 355(b)(2) of this title; and
(ii) the applicant or requester shall provide notice as described in
section 355(b)(3) of this title.
(B)
For purposes of this paragraph and paragraph (4), the term “approved drug” means an active ingredient—
(i) that was in an application previously approved under
section 355(c) of this title;
(ii) where such application is relied upon by the applicant submitting the application or request described in subparagraph (A);
(iii) for which full reports of investigations that have been made to show whether such drug is safe for use and whether such drug is effective in use were not conducted by or for the applicant submitting the application or request described in subparagraph (A); and
(iv) for which the applicant submitting the application or request described in subparagraph (A) has not obtained a right of reference or use from the person by or for whom the investigations described in clause (iii) were conducted.
(C)
The following provisions shall apply with respect to an application or request described in subparagraph (A) to the same extent and in the same manner as if such application or request were an application described in
section 355(b)(2) of this title that referenced the approved drug:
(i) Subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of
section 355(c)(3) of this title.
(ii) Clauses (ii), (iii), and (iv) of
section 355(c)(3)(E) of this title.
(iii) Subsections (b) and (c) of
section 355a of this title.
(iv)
Section 355f(a) of this title.
(v)
Section 360cc(a) of this title.
(D) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subsection, an application or request for classification for a combination product described in subparagraph (A) shall be considered an application submitted under
section 355(b)(2) of this title for purposes of
section 271(e)(2)(A) of title 35.
(6) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed as prohibiting a sponsor from submitting separate applications for the constituent parts of a combination product, unless the Secretary determines that a single application is necessary.
(7) Nothing in this subsection shall prevent the Secretary from using any agency resources of the Food and Drug Administration necessary to ensure adequate review of the safety, effectiveness, or substantial equivalence of an article.
(8)
(A) Not later than 60 days after October 26, 2002, the Secretary shall establish within the Office of the Commissioner of Food and Drugs an office to ensure the prompt assignment of combination products to agency centers, the timely and effective premarket review of such products, and consistent and appropriate postmarket regulation of like products subject to the same statutory requirements to the extent permitted by law. Additionally, the office shall, in determining whether a product is to be designated a combination product, consult with the component within the Office of the Commissioner of Food and Drugs that is responsible for such determinations. Such office (referred to in this paragraph as the “Office”) shall have appropriate scientific and medical expertise, and shall be headed by a director.
(B) In carrying out this subsection, the Office shall, for each combination product, promptly assign an agency center with primary jurisdiction in accordance with paragraph (1) for the premarket review of such product.
(C)
(i) In carrying out this subsection, the Office shall help to ensure timely and effective premarket review that involves more than one agency center by coordinating such reviews, overseeing the timeliness of such reviews, and overseeing the alignment of feedback regarding such reviews.
(ii) In order to ensure the timeliness and alignment of the premarket review of a combination product, the agency center with primary jurisdiction for the product, and the consulting agency center, shall be responsible to the Office with respect to the timeliness and alignment of the premarket review.
(iii) The Office shall ensure that, with respect to a combination product, a designated person or persons in the primary agency center is the primary point or points of contact for the sponsor of such combination product. The Office shall also coordinate communications to and from any consulting center involved in such premarket review, if requested by such primary agency center or any such consulting center. Agency communications and commitments, to the extent consistent with other provisions of law and the requirements of all affected agency centers, from the primary agency center shall be considered as communication from the Secretary on behalf of all agency centers involved in the review.
(iv)
The Office shall, with respect to the premarket review of a combination product—
(I) ensure that any meeting between the Secretary and the sponsor of such product is attended by each agency center involved in the review, as appropriate;
(II) ensure that each consulting agency center has completed its premarket review and provided the results of such review to the primary agency center in a timely manner; and
(III) ensure that each consulting center follows the guidance described in clause (vi) and advises, as appropriate, on other relevant regulations, guidances, and policies.
(v)
In seeking agency action with respect to a combination product, the sponsor of such product—
(I) shall identify the product as a combination product; and
(II) may request in writing the participation of representatives of the Office in meetings related to such combination product, or to have the Office otherwise engage on such regulatory matters concerning the combination product.
(vi)
Not later than 4 years after December 13, 2016, and after a public comment period of not less than 60 calendar days, the Secretary shall issue a final guidance that describes—
(I) the structured process for managing pre-submission interactions with sponsors developing combination products;
(II) the best practices for ensuring that the feedback in such pre-submission interactions represents the Agency’s best advice based on the information provided during such pre-submission interactions;
So in original. The word “and” probably should appear.
(III) the information that is required to be submitted with a meeting request under paragraph (2), how such meetings relate to other types of meetings in the Food and Drug Administration, and the form and content of any agreement reached through a meeting under such paragraph (2);
So in original. The semicolon probably should be a period.
(D) In carrying out this subsection, the Office shall ensure the consistency and appropriateness of postmarket regulation of like products subject to the same statutory requirements to the extent permitted by law.
(E)
(i) Any dispute regarding the timeliness of the premarket review of a combination product may be presented to the Office for resolution, unless the dispute is clearly premature.
(ii) During the review process, any dispute regarding the substance of the premarket review may be presented to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs after first being considered by the agency center with primary jurisdiction of the premarket review, under the scientific dispute resolution procedures for such center. The Commissioner of Food and Drugs shall consult with the Director of the Office in resolving the substantive dispute.
(F) The Secretary, acting through the Office, shall review each agreement, guidance, or practice of the Secretary that is specific to the assignment of combination products to agency centers and shall determine whether the agreement, guidance, or practice is consistent with the requirements of this subsection. In carrying out such review, the Secretary shall consult with stakeholders and the directors of the agency centers. After such consultation, the Secretary shall determine whether to continue in effect, modify, revise, or eliminate such agreement, guidance, or practice, and shall publish in the Federal Register a notice of the availability of such modified or revised agreement, guidance or practice. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as preventing the Secretary from following each agreement, guidance, or practice until continued, modified, revised, or eliminated.
(G)
Not later than one year after October 26, 2002 (except with respect to clause (iv), beginning not later than one year after December 13, 2016), and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall report to the appropriate committees of Congress on the activities and impact of the Office. The report shall include provisions—
(i) describing the numbers and types of combination products under review and the timeliness in days of such assignments, reviews, and dispute resolutions;
(ii) identifying the number of premarket reviews of such products that involved a consulting agency center;
(iii) describing improvements in the consistency of postmarket regulation of combination products; and
(iv) identifying the percentage of combination products for which a dispute resolution, with respect to premarket review, was requested by the combination product’s sponsor.
(H) Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the regulatory authority of any agency center.
(9)
As used in this subsection:
(A) The term “agency center” means a center or alternative organizational component of the Food and Drug Administration.
(B) The term “biological product” has the meaning given the term in section 351(i) of the Public Health Service Act (
42 U.S.C. 262(i)).
(C)
The term “market clearance” includes—
(i) approval of an application under section 355, 357, 360e, or 360j(g) of this title;
See References in Text note below.
(ii) a finding of substantial equivalence under this part;
(iii) approval of a biologics license application under subsection (a) of section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (
42 U.S.C. 262); and
(iv) de novo classification under
section 360c(a)(1) of this title.
(D) The terms “premarket review” and “reviews” include all activities of the Food and Drug Administration conducted prior to approval or clearance of an application, notification, or request for classification submitted under section 355, 360(k), 360c(f)(2), 360e, or 360j of this title or under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act [
42 U.S.C. 262], including with respect to investigational use of the product.
References in Text
The Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, referred to in subsec. (e)(4)(M)(ii), is Pub. L. 91–513, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1236, which is classified principally to chapter 13 (§ 801 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 801 of this title and Tables.
The Public Health Service Act, referred to in subsec. (g)(2)(A)(iv)(II), (3), is act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, 58 Stat. 682, as amended, which is classified generally to chapter 6A (§ 201 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 201 of Title 42 and Tables.
Section 357 of this title, referred to in subsec. (g)(5)(C)(i), was repealed by Pub. L. 105–115, title I, § 125(b)(1), Nov. 21, 1997, 111 Stat. 2325.
Codification
In subsec. (b)(5), “sections 4721, 6001, and 6151 of title 26” and “section 4761 of title 26” substituted for “section 3220 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 3220)” and “section 3238(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 3238(b))”, respectively, on authority of section 7852(b) of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
Amendments
2016—Subsec. (g)(1). Pub. L. 114–255, § 3038(a)(4), added par. (1) and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows: “The Secretary shall in accordance with this subsection assign an agency center to regulate products that constitute a combination of a drug, device, or biological product. The Secretary shall determine the primary mode of action of the combination product. If the Secretary determines that the primary mode of action is that of—
“(A) a drug (other than a biological product), the agency center charged with premarket review of drugs shall have primary jurisdiction,
“(B) a device, the agency center charged with premarket review of devices shall have primary jurisdiction, or
“(C) a biological product, the agency center charged with premarket review of biological products shall have primary jurisdiction.”
Subsec. (g)(2). Pub. L. 114–255, § 3038(a)(4), added par. (2). Former par. (2) redesignated (7).
Subsec. (g)(3). Pub. L. 114–255, § 3038(a)(1), (4), added par. (3) and struck out former par. (3) which read as follows: “The Secretary shall promulgate regulations to implement market clearance procedures in accordance with paragraphs (1) and (2) not later than 1 year after November 28, 1990.”
Subsec. (g)(4) to (6). Pub. L. 114–255, § 3038(a)(4), added pars. (4) to (6). Former pars. (4) and (5) redesignated (8) and (9), respectively.
Subsec. (g)(7). Pub. L. 114–255, § 3038(a)(2), redesignated par. (2) as (7).
Subsec. (g)(8). Pub. L. 114–255, § 3038(a)(3), redesignated par. (4) as (8).
Subsec. (g)(8)(C)(i). Pub. L. 114–255, § 3038(a)(5)(A)(i), amended cl. (i) generally. Prior to amendment, cl. (i) read as follows: “In carrying out this subsection, the Office shall ensure timely and effective premarket reviews by overseeing the timeliness of and coordinating reviews involving more than one agency center.”
Subsec. (g)(8)(C)(ii). Pub. L. 114–255, § 3038(a)(5)(A)(ii), inserted “and alignment” after “the timeliness” in two places.
Subsec. (g)(8)(C)(iii) to (vi). Pub. L. 114–255, § 3038(a)(5)(A)(iii), added cls. (iii) to (vi).
Subsec. (g)(8)(G). Pub. L. 114–255, § 3038(a)(5)(B)(i), inserted “(except with respect to clause (iv), beginning not later than one year after December 13, 2016)” after “October 26, 2002” in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (g)(8)(G)(iv). Pub. L. 114–255, § 3038(a)(5)(B)(ii)–(iv), added cl. (iv).
Subsec. (g)(9). Pub. L. 114–255, § 3038(a)(3), redesignated par. (5) as (9).
Subsec. (g)(9)(C). Pub. L. 114–255, § 3038(a)(6)(A), substituted semicolon for comma at end of cl. (i), semicolon for “, and” at end of cl. (ii), and “; and” for period at end of cl. (iii), and added cl. (iv).
Subsec. (g)(9)(D). Pub. L. 114–255, § 3038(a)(6)(B), added subpar. (D).
2013—Subsec. (d)(4). Pub. L. 113–54, § 204(b), added par. (4).
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 113–54, § 204(a)(1)–(4), added pars. (1) to (6) and struck out former pars. (1) to (3). Prior to amendment, pars. (1) to (3) set out certain disclosure and licensing requirements for wholesale distributors and defined “authorized distributors of record” and “wholesale distribution”.
2004—Subsec. (f)(1)(A)(ii). Pub. L. 108–282, § 102(b)(5)(F)(i), substituted “360b of this title, a conditionally-approved application under section 360ccc of this title, or an index listing under section 360ccc–1 of this title” for “360b of this title”.
Subsec. (f)(3). Pub. L. 108–282, § 102(b)(5)(F)(ii), substituted “section 360b, 360ccc, or 360ccc–1” for “section 360b”.
2002—Subsec. (g)(1). Pub. L. 107–250, § 204(1)(A), substituted “shall in accordance with this subsection assign an agency center” for “shall designate a component of the Food and Drug Administration” in first sentence of introductory provisions.
Subsec. (g)(1)(A) to (C). Pub. L. 107–250, § 204(1)(B), substituted “the agency center charged” for “the persons charged”.
Subsec. (g)(4). Pub. L. 107–250, § 204(3), added par. (4). Former par. (4) redesignated (5).
Subsec. (g)(5). Pub. L. 107–250, § 204(2), (4), redesignated par. (4) as (5), added subpar. (A), and redesignated former subpars. (A) and (B) as (B) and (C), respectively.
1997—Subsec. (b)(1)(A) to (C). Pub. L. 105–115, § 126(c)(1), redesignated subpars. (B) and (C) as (A) and (B), respectively, and struck out former subpar. (A), which read as follows: “is a habit-forming drug to which section 352(d) of this title applies; or”.
Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 105–115, § 126(c)(2), struck out reference to section 352(d) of this title before “355”.
Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 105–115, § 126(a), amended par. (4) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (4) read as follows: “A drug which is subject to paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be deemed to be misbranded if at any time prior to dispensing its label fails to bear the statement ‘Caution: Federal law prohibits dispensing without prescription’. A drug to which paragraph (1) of this subsection does not apply shall be deemed to be misbranded if at any time prior to dispensing its label bears the caution statement quoted in the preceding sentence.”
Subsec. (g)(4)(A). Pub. L. 105–115, § 123(e)(1), substituted “section 351(i)” for “section 351(a)” and “262(i)” for “262(a)”.
Subsec. (g)(4)(B)(iii). Pub. L. 105–115, § 123(e)(2), substituted “biologics license application under subsection (a)” for “product or establishment license under subsection (a) or (d)”.
1996—Subsec. (f)(1)(A). Pub. L. 104–250 inserted “, other than a veterinary feed directive drug intended for use in animal feed or an animal feed bearing or containing a veterinary feed directive drug,” after “other than man” in introductory provisions.
1992—Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 102–353, § 4(1), amended par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (1) read as follows: “Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3), no representative of a drug manufacturer or distributor may distribute any drug sample.”
Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 102–353, § 4(2), substituted “authorized distributor of record” for “distributor” wherever appearing.
Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 102–353, § 4(2), substituted “authorized distributor of record” for “distributor” and “authorized distributors of record” for “distributors” wherever appearing.
Subsec. (e)(1). Pub. L. 102–353, § 4(3), amended par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (1) read as follows: “Each person who is engaged in the wholesale distribution of drugs subject to subsection (b) of this section and who is not an authorized distributor of record of such drugs shall provide to each wholesale distributor of such drugs a statement identifying each sale of the drug (including the date of the sale) before the sale to such wholesale distributor. Each manufacturer shall maintain at its corporate offices a current list of such authorized distributors.”
Subsec. (e)(2)(A). Pub. L. 102–353, § 2(a), (d), temporarily inserted “or has registered with the Secretary in accordance with paragraph (3)”. See Termination Date of 1992 Amendment note below.
Subsec. (e)(3). Pub. L. 102–353, § 2(b), (d), temporarily added par. (3). Former par. (3) redesignated (4). See Termination Date of 1992 Amendment note below.
Subsec. (e)(4). Pub. L. 102–353, § 4(4), inserted “and subsection (d) of this section” after “For the purposes of this subsection”.
Pub. L. 102–353, § 2(b), (d), temporarily redesignated par. (3) as (4). See Termination Date of 1992 Amendment note below.
Subsec. (f)(1)(B). Pub. L. 102–353, § 2(c), which directed the substitution of “an order” for “and order”, could not be executed because “and order” did not appear in subpar. (B).
Subsec. (g)(3). Pub. L. 102–300 substituted “clearance” for “approval”.
1991—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–108, § 2(d)(3), redesignated subsec. (c), relating to veterinary prescription drugs, as (f). Former subsec. (f) redesignated (g).
Subsec. (c)(2), (3)(B)(v). Pub. L. 102–108, § 2(d)(1), made technical amendment to reference to subsection (b) of this section involving corresponding provision of original act.
Subsec. (d)(3)(E). Pub. L. 102–108, § 2(d)(2), made technical amendment to reference to subsection (c)(1) of this section involving corresponding provision of original act.
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 102–108, § 2(d)(4), redesignated subsec. (f), relating to regulation of combination products, as (g).
Pub. L. 102–108, § 2(d)(3), redesignated subsec. (c), relating to veterinary prescription drugs, as (f).
Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 102–108, § 2(d)(4), redesignated subsec. (f), relating to regulation of combination products, as (g).
1990—Pub. L. 101–629, § 16(a)(1), substituted “Exemptions and consideration for certain drugs, devices, and biological products” for “Exemptions in case of drugs and devices” in section catchline.
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 101–629, § 16(a)(2), added subsec. (f).
1988—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 100–670 added subsec. (c) relating to veterinary prescription drugs.
Pub. L. 100–293, § 4, added subsec. (c) relating to sales restrictions.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 100–293, § 5, added subsec. (d).
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 100–293, § 6, added subsec. (e).
1970—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 91–601 included exemption from packaging requirements of subsec. (p) of section 352 of this title.
1962—Subsec. (b)(1)(C). Pub. L. 87–781 substituted “approved” for “effective”.
1951—Subsec. (b). Act Oct. 26, 1951, amended subsec. (b) generally to protect the public from abuses in the sale of potent prescription drugs, and to relieve retail pharmacists and the public from unnecessary restrictions on the dispensation of drugs that are safe to use without supervision of a doctor.
Effective Date of 2013 Amendment
Pub. L. 113–54, title II, § 204(c), Nov. 27, 2013, 127 Stat. 636, provided that:
“The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) [enacting
section 360eee–2 of this title and amending this section] shall take effect on January 1, 2015.”
Effective Date of 1997 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 105–115 effective 90 days after Nov. 21, 1997, except as otherwise provided, see section 501 of Pub. L. 105–115, set out as a note under section 321 of this title.
Termination Date of 1992 Amendment
Pub. L. 102–353, § 2(d), Aug. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 941, provided that:
“Effective September 14, 1994, the amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) [amending this section] shall no longer be in effect.”
Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Pub. L. 100–293, § 8, Apr. 22, 1988, 102 Stat. 100, provided that:
“(a) General Rule.— Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act and the amendments made by this Act [amending this section and sections 331, 333, and 381 of this title and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section and
section 301 of this title] shall take effect upon the expiration of 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Apr. 22, 1988].
“(b) Exception.—
“(1) Section 503(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 353(d)] (as added by section 5 of this Act) shall take effect upon the expiration of 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Apr. 22, 1988].
“(2) The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall by regulation issue the guidelines required by section 503(e)(2)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 353(e)(2)(B)] (as added by section 6 of this Act) not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. Section 503(e)(2)(A) of such Act shall take effect upon the expiration of 2 years after the date such regulations are promulgated and take effect.”
Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 91–601 effective Dec. 30, 1970, and regulations establishing special packaging standards effective no sooner than 180 days or later than one year from date regulations are final, or an earlier date published in Federal Register, see section 8 of Pub. L. 91–601, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1471 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
Effective Date of 1962 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 87–781 effective Oct. 10, 1962, see section 107 of Pub. L. 87–781, set out as a note under section 321 of this title.
Effective Date of 1951 Amendment
Amendment by act Oct. 26, 1951, effective six months after Oct. 26, 1951, see section 3 of act Oct. 26, 1951, set out as a note under section 333 of this title.
Transfer of Functions
For transfer of functions of Federal Security Administrator to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare [now Health and Human Services], and of Food and Drug Administration in the Department of Agriculture to Federal Security Agency, see notes set out under section 321 of this title.
Effective Medication Guides
Pub. L. 104–180, title VI, § 601, Aug. 6, 1996, 110 Stat. 1593, provided that:
“(a) In General.— Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Aug. 6, 1996], the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services shall request that national organizations representing health care professionals, consumer organizations, voluntary health agencies, the pharmaceutical industry, drug wholesalers, patient drug information database companies, and other relevant parties collaborate to develop a long-range comprehensive action plan to achieve goals consistent with the goals of the proposed rule of the Food and Drug Administration on ‘Prescription Drug Product Labeling: Medication Guide Requirements’ (60 Fed. Reg. 44182; relating to the provision of oral and written prescription information to consumers).
“(b) Goals.— Goals consistent with the proposed rule described in subsection (a) are the distribution of useful written information to 75 percent of individuals receiving new precriptions [sic] by the year 2000 and to 95 percent by the year 2006.
“(c) Plan.—
The plan described in subsection (a) shall—
“(1) identify the plan goals;
“(2) assess the effectiveness of the current private-sector approaches used to provide oral and written prescription information to consumers;
“(3) develop guidelines for providing effective oral and written prescription information consistent with the findings of any such assessment;
“(4) contain elements necessary to ensure the transmittal of useful information to the consuming public, including being scientifically accurate, non-promotional in tone and content, sufficiently specific and comprehensive as to adequately inform consumers about the use of the product, and in an understandable, legible format that is readily comprehensible and not confusing to consumers expected to use the product.[;]
“(5) develop a mechanism to assess periodically the quality of the oral and written prescription information and the frequency with which the information is provided to consumers; and
“(6) provide for compliance with relevant State board regulations.
“(d) Limitation on the Authority of the Secretary.— The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services shall have no authority to implement the proposed rule described in subsection (a), or to develop any similar regulation, policy statement, or other guideline specifying a uniform content or format for written information voluntarily provided to consumers about prescription drugs if, (1) not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Aug. 6, 1996], the national organizations described in subsection (a) develop and submit to the Secretary for Health and Human Services a comprehensive, long-range action plan (as described in subsection (a)) which shall be acceptable to the Secretary of Health and Human Services; (2) the aforementioned plan is submitted to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for review and acceptance:
Provided, That the Secretary shall give due consideration to the submitted plan and that any such acceptance shall not be arbitrarily withheld; and (3) the implementation of (a) a plan accepted by the Secretary commences within 30 days of the Secretary’s acceptance of such plan, or (b) the plan submitted to the Secretary commences within 60 days of the submission of such plan if the Secretary fails to take any action on the plan within 30 days of the submission of the plan. The Secretary shall accept, reject or suggest modifications to the plan submitted within 30 days of its submission. The Secretary may confer with and assist private parties in the development of the plan described in subsections (a) and (b).
“(e) Secretary Review.— Not later than January 1, 2001, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services shall review the status of private-sector initiatives designed to achieve the goals of the plan described in subsection (a), and if such goals are not achieved, the limitation in subsection (d) shall not apply, and the Secretary shall seek public comment on other initiatives that may be carried out to meet such goals.”
Congressional Findings
Pub. L. 100–293, § 2, Apr. 22, 1988, 102 Stat. 95, provided that:
“The Congress finds the following:
“(1) American consumers cannot purchase prescription drugs with the certainty that the products are safe and effective.
“(2) The integrity of the distribution system for prescription drugs is insufficient to prevent the introduction and eventual retail sale of substandard, ineffective, or even counterfeit drugs.
“(3) The existence and operation of a wholesale submarket, commonly known as the ‘diversion market’, prevents effective control over or even routine knowledge of the true sources of prescription drugs in a significant number of cases.
“(4) Large amounts of drugs are being reimported to the United States as American goods returned. These imports are a health and safety risk to American consumers because they may have become subpotent or adulterated during foreign handling and shipping.
“(5) The ready market for prescription drug reimports has been the catalyst for a continuing series of frauds against American manufacturers and has provided the cover for the importation of foreign counterfeit drugs.
“(6) The existing system of providing drug samples to physicians through manufacturer’s representatives has been abused for decades and has resulted in the sale to consumers of misbranded, expired, and adulterated pharmaceuticals.
“(7) The bulk resale of below wholesale priced prescription drugs by health care entities, for ultimate sale at retail, helps fuel the diversion market and is an unfair form of competition to wholesalers and retailers that must pay otherwise prevailing market prices.
“(8) The effect of these several practices and conditions is to create an unacceptable risk that counterfeit, adulterated, misbranded, subpotent, or expired drugs will be sold to American consumers.”