Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CADE v. BURSON, Director, et al.

MOBLEY, Justice.

R. H. Burson, the appellee, contends that the appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the enumeration of errors was not filed in this court within the time required by the law (Secs. 13 and 14 of the Appellate Practice Act; Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 29-30 and 240, 242-244; Code Ann. §§ 6-809, 6-810) and Rule 20 of this court. The record discloses that this appeal was docketed in this court on November 29, 1965, and the enumeration of errors was filed on December 21, 1965, seven days after the last day on which it could have been filed. The enumeration of errors not being timely filed, under the rulings in Stanford v. Evans, Reed Williams, 221 Ga. 331, 332 ( 145 S.E.2d 504), Yost v. Gunby, 221 Ga. 552 ( 145 S.E.2d 575), and Undercofler v. McLennan, 221 Ga. 613 ( 146 S.E.2d 635), we hereby dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed. All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 10, 1966 — DECIDED JANUARY 18, 1966.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CADE v. BURSON
(Jan 18, 1966)