Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNDERCOFLER, State Re v. nue Commissioner

ALMAND, Justice.

The appellees move to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that the enumeration of errors was not filed in this court within the time prescribed by the law (Sections 13 and 14, Appellate Practice Act; Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 29-30, 240, 242-244; Code Ann. §§ 6-809, 6-810) and Rule 20 of this court. The record discloses that this appeal was docketed on September 28, 1965, and the enumeration of errors was filed on October 22, 1965. The enumeration of errors not being timely filed, under the rulings in Stanford v. Evans, Reed Williams, 221 Ga. 331 ( 145 S.E.2d 504) and Yost v. Gunby, 221 Ga. 552 ( 145 S.E.2d 575), the motion to dismiss is sustained.

Appeal dismissed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED NOVEMBER 9, 1965 — DECIDED JANUARY 6, 1966.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNDERCOFLER v. McLENNAN
(Jan 6, 1966)