KEHOE, Judge.
Appellant, plaintiff below, appeals from an order, in an action at law, granting appellee's motion for summary judgment. The decretal portion of the trial court's order reads:
"Ordered and adjudged that the motion for summary judgment be, and the same is hereby granted."
This order is merely authorization for a final judgment. It does not constitute a final judgment, nor is it an order from which an interlocutory appeal could properly lie. See Harris v. Mosteller, 253 So.2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971); Arnold v. Brady, 178 So.2d 732 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965); Lyden v. DePiera, 147 So.2d 573 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); Stone v. Buckley, 119 So.2d 298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960); Chastain v. Embry, 118 So.2d 33 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960); Elliott v. Lazar, 104 So.2d 618 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958); and Renard v. Kirkeby Hotels, 99 So.2d 719 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958).
We recognize our authority to treat the appeal before the court as a petition for certiorari; however, we decline to do so and dismiss the appeal sua sponte.
Appeal dismissed.