Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHN A. LYDEN, DOING BUSINESS AS MICKLER LYDEN, APPELLANT, v. LILIA ROJAS DePIERA AND HENRI F. WITHINGTON AND GLADYS WITHINGTON, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, seeks review of a final judgment rendered in favor of the defendant following a nonjury trial.

Unfortunately, the trial proceedings were not transcribed and the record has not been perfected in accordance with the principles announced in Potash v. Dry Company, 8 Fla. Supp. 174, which procedure was cited with approval by this court in Moyer v. Moyer, Fla.App. 1959, 114 So.2d 638.

Therefore, not having the evidence before us that was taken in the trial court, we have no alternative but to affirm the final judgment. See: Hall v. Davis, Fla.App. 1958, 106 So.2d 599.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LYDEN v. DePIERA
(Jan 3, 1963)