Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION,PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES INVESTMENT CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OFNEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND SAVE WAY STATIONS, INC., HACKENSACKWATER COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND TOWN OF SECAUCUS, AMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinions of the Appellate Division, reported at 151 N.J. Super. 14 (1977), and the Law Division, reported at 143 N.J. Super. 541 (1976).

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER and Judge CONFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. CHARLES INVESTMENT CORPORATION
(May 2, 1978)