Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Harold A. Kuskin argued the cause for appellant (
  • Wilentz, Goldman Spitzer, attorneys
  • Ms. M. Kathleen Duncan on the brief). Mr. Philip F. Mattia, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General, attorney
  • Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Harold A. Kuskin argued the cause for appellant (
  • Wilentz, Goldman Spitzer, attorneys
  • Ms. M. Kathleen Duncan on the brief). Mr. Philip F. Mattia, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General, attorney
  • Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES INVESTMENT CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND SAVE-WAY STATIONS, INC., HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND TOWN OF SECAUCUS, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division, is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Bilder.

Despite the suggestion of the condemnee, the specific circumstances of this case satisfy us that Washington Market Enterprises v. Trenton, 68 N.J. 107 (1975). has no application.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

STATE v. CHARLES INVESTMENT CORPORATION
(Jun 21, 1977)