Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD A. WARREN, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The defendant, following an extensive on-the-record colloquy between his counsel, the defendant and the Trial Judge regarding the details of the robbery in which the defendant articulated the factual details of the crime charged in the indictment, pleaded guilty to the charge of robbery third degree. He now claims that his plea should be vacated because, as he now belatedly asserts, the elements of the crime were not clearly spelled in the statements made to the court at the time he entered his plea, a claim which he raised for the first time at the Appellate Division. Not having raised the issue by motion to vacate or otherwise in the court of first instance, no error has been preserved for review (People v Primmer, 46 N.Y.2d 1048; People v Adams, 46 N.Y.2d 1047).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. WARREN
(Apr 26, 1979)