Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. IRVING ADAMS, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Despite the defendant's manifested awareness of the Trial Judge's involvement in the plea negotiations and of the statutorily prescribed term for a class A-III felony, neither at the time he decided to plead guilty, nor at his sentencing four months later, did the defendant take any exception. Nor did he subsequently move to vacate the plea and the sentence imposed thereon. Consequently, any errors in connection therewith, if errors they were, not having been preserved, are now beyond our power of review (CPL 470.05, subd 2; People v McGowen, 42 N.Y.2d 905, 907 [alleged sentence defect resulting from court's failure to make youthful offender determination]; People v Adams, 38 N.Y.2d 605, 607 [alleged speedy trial defect]).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ADAMS
(Apr 3, 1979)