Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

DOLORES NOIA, Appellant v. GILDA DE ROSA et al., Respondents.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We find no error of law in the charge to the jury given by the trial court, and the order of the Appellate Division should not be reversed on that ground.

Insofar as the determination of the Appellate Division to reverse the Trial Term's order for a new trial and to reinstate the jury verdict was based on that court's evaluation of the weight of the evidence it is not subject to our review (Donigi v American Cyanamid Co., 43 N.Y.2d 935; Pfohl v Wipperman, 34 N.Y.2d 597).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NOIA v. De ROSA
(Jun 18, 1981)