Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

CHARLES A. PFOHL, Deceased, by RICHARD C. PFOHL, Administrator of the Estate of CHARLES A. PFOHL, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. RICHARD WIPPERMAN et al., Respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs to defendants-respondents, in the following memorandum: Our court has jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. We conclude, however, that there are presented only questions of fact as to the weight of the evidence and no question of law. Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division is outside our power of review. ( Armstrong v. Campbell, 30 N.Y.2d 704; Cameron v. Permakoff, 28 N.Y.2d 938; Indiere v. Strickroth, 28 N.Y.2d 513; Musumeci v. Pillsbury Mills, 11 N.Y.2d 948; Gutin v. Mascali Sons, 11 N.Y.2d 97; see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev. ed.], § 148, p. 588.)

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, RABIN and STEVENS.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PFOHL v. WIPPERMAN
(Mar 21, 1974)