Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Re v. ew,

LENT, J.

The issue is similar to that presented in State v. Clevenger, 297 Or. 234, 683 P.2d 1360 (1984).

Defendant appealed from a judgment on conviction on his plea of guilty. He assigned as error the trial court's denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea and to plead not guilty and go to trial.

On appeal the state argued that the claim of error could not be reached in an appeal under ORS 138.050, relying primarily on this court's decision in State v. Jairl, 229 Or. 533, 368 P.2d 323 (1962). Defendant responded that this court in State v. Cornelius, 249 Or. 454, 438 P.2d 1020 (1968), and State v. Burnett, 228 Or. 556, 365 P.2d 1060 (1961), had held, contrary to Jairl, that the denial of a motion to change plea from guilty to not guilty could be reached on direct appeal.

The Court of Appeals held on the authority of its decision in State v. Clevenger, 64 Or. App. 183, 667 P.2d 9 (1983), that it had no authority to consider this assignment of error on direct appeal. State v. Elwood, 64 Or. App. 422, 668 P.2d 474 (1983).

We allowed the defendant's petition for review for the same reasons we allowed the petition for review in State v. Clevenger, supra. For the reasons set forth in our opinion in that case, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals in this case.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. ELWOOD
(Jun 5, 1984)