Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RODNEY KEITH ELWOOD, Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Obligation to pay restitution and attorney fee vacated; remanded for resentencing.

PER CURIAM

Defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of criminal mischief. He assigns error to the trial court's subsequent refusal to permit him to withdraw his guilty pleas. This court has no authority to consider defendant's contentions in this regard on direct appeal. ORS 138.050; State v. Clevenger, 64 Or. App. 183, 667 P.2d 9 (1983); see also State v. Lugo, 48 Or. App. 919, 618 P.2d 986 (1980); State v. Slopak, 3 Or. App. 532, 475 P.2d 421 (1970); but see State v. Cornelius, 249 Or. 454, 438 P.2d 1020 (1968). Defendant's remedy, if any, lies in post-conviction relief.

Defendant contends, in the alternative, that the trial court erred in imposing requirements of restitution and repayment of the cost of court-appointed counsel, without determining defendant's present or future ability to pay. The state concedes that the record in this case is not adequate to support a finding that defendant is or will be able to pay restitution and costs. ORS 137.106(2)(a)(b); ORS 161.665(2); see State v. Smith, 60 Or. App. 139, 652 P.2d 882 (1982).

The part of the judgment imposing on defendant the obligation to pay restitution and attorney fees is vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. ELWOOD
(Nov 8, 1983)