AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT R. WOOLEY, Also Known as ROBERT K. WOOLEY, Appellant.

Judgments affirmed.

Not having raised the issue by motion to vacate or otherwise at nisi prius, defendant's argument that he should be relieved of his pleas of guilty has not been preserved for appellate review as a matter of law ( People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Pascale, 48 N.Y.2d 997; People v Warren, 47 N.Y.2d 740; People v Lawrence, 100 A.D.2d 944; People v Asep, 97 A.D.2d 798). Nor is reversal warranted in the interest of justice since the record clearly reveals that defendant's guilty pleas were knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made ( People v Modica, 100 A.D.2d 559, mod on other grounds 64 N.Y.2d 828).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Weinstein, J.P., Brown, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. WOOLEY
(Feb 19, 1985)