AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of VICTOR G. SALLEY, Appellant, v. HEMPSTEAD SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent.

Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements, and judgment dated February 5, 1985, vacated.

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

One of the issues raised in the petition was whether the respondent's determination was supported by substantial evidence, and the proceeding should therefore have been transferred to the Appellate Division for disposition (CPLR 7804 [g]). This court is empowered to treat the matter as if it had been properly transferred in the first instance. Hence, our review treats the matter as an original proceeding (see, Matter of Central Nyack Fire Dist. v. Valley Cottage Fire Dist., 101 A.D.2d 886; Matter of O'Donnell v. Rozzi, 99 A.D.2d 494; Matter of Rivera v. Beekman, 86 A.D.2d 1, 5).

There was substantial evidence to support the determination (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176). Additionally, there is no merit to the petitioner's contention that the determination must be annulled by reason of the respondent's alleged failure to designate a hearing officer in writing (see, Civil Service Law § 75; Matter of Wiggins v. Board of Educ., 60 N.Y.2d 385). The written record of the adoption by the respondent of the resolution appointing the hearing officer in this matter fully satisfies that requirement. Weinstein, J.P., Niehoff, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF SALLEY v. HEMPSTEAD SCHOOL DISTRICT
(Jun 16, 1986)