AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

CATHERINE FOX, Respondent, v. WYETH LABORATORIES, INC., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The proponent of a motion for summary judgment is required to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment, as a matter of law, offering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issues of fact from the case. The failure to make such a showing requires the denial of the motion, regardless of the insufficiency of the opposing papers (see, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 N.Y.2d 851; Royal v Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 122 A.D.2d 132; Raia Indus. v Young, 124 A.D.2d 722).

In the case at bar, the defendants Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., and American Home Products Corp. established that they provided warnings of the side effects suffered by the infant plaintiff after a DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) inoculation. However, the evidence submitted failed to establish, as a matter of law, that the warnings were adequate. Therefore, a material issue of fact remains, and summary judgment was properly denied (see, Baker v St. Agnes Hosp., 70 A.D.2d 400; cf., Wolfgruber v Upjohn Co., 72 A.D.2d 59, affd 52 N.Y.2d 768; Eiser v Feldman, 123 A.D.2d 388). Bracken, J.P., Brown, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FOX v. WYETH LABORATORIES, INC
(Apr 13, 1987)