AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

KATINA FORNEY, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, DALAR BUTLER, Appellant, v. HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL et al., Defendants, and PETER JANUZZI et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, and defendants Januzzi and Levine are precluded from offering evidence at trial on the issues contained in items 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the plaintiff's verified demand for a bill of particulars separately served upon them unless they respond thereto within 20 days after service upon them of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

The second cause of action in the complaint alleged that the defendants treated the infant plaintiff without obtaining an informed consent. In their answers, Januzzi and Levine interposed the affirmative defenses found in Public Health Law § 2805-d (4). The burden of proving these defenses resides with Januzzi and Levine (see, Rubino v. Albany Med. Center Hosp., 117 A.D.2d 909; CPLR 3018 [b]). Accordingly, they must respond to items 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the demand for a verified bill of particulars, which seek amplification of these issues. Thompson, J.P., Niehoff, Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FORNEY v. HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL, JANUZZI
(Nov 16, 1987)