Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Generally, claims which were or could have been reviewed on direct appeal from a judgment of conviction are not subject to review by habeas corpus (see, People ex rel. Phifer v Scully, 107 A.D.2d 729). Nor do the facts of this case indicate a violation of the petitioner's fundamental constitutional rights such as to warrant a departure from traditional orderly procedure (cf., Stone v Powell, 428 U.S. 465; People ex rel. Keitt v McMann, 18 N.Y.2d 257). Mangano, J.P., Brown, Lawrence, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.