Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The claims petitioner raises were or could have been reviewed on the direct appeal from the judgment of conviction. Hence, they are not subject to review by habeas corpus (see People ex rel. Williams v. Scully, 107 A.D.2d 729; People ex rel. Douglas v Vincent, 67 A.D.2d 587, affd 50 N.Y.2d 901; People ex rel. Taylor v Commissioner of Correction, 100 A.D.2d 525; People ex rel. Hall v LeFevre, 92 A.D.2d 956, affd 60 N.Y.2d 579). Mollen, P.J., Bracken, O'Connor and Niehoff, JJ., concur.