Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SHAPIRO v. SHAPIRO.

BELL, Justice.

We granted an application to appeal in this case to determine whether periodic cohabitation is a sufficient ground to terminate alimony under the live-in lover statute, OCGA § 19-6-19 (b). Because the record reveals no evidence that the appellee and her "live-in lover" dwelled together continuously, we conclude that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to the appellee. Reiter v. Reiter, 258 Ga. 101 ( 365 S.E.2d 826) (1988); Daniels v. Daniels, 258 Ga. 791 ( 374 S.E.2d 735) (1989).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur. Weltner, J., disqualified.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 11, 1989.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHAPIRO v. SHAPIRO
(Sep 11, 1989)