Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DANIELS v. DANIELS.

CLARKE, Presiding Justice.

The trial court terminated former wife's alimony based on the live-in lover statute, OCGA § 19-6-19 (b). The statute provides that where the alimony recipient enters into a relationship of voluntary cohabitation, dwelling together continuously and openly in a meretricious relationship with a member of the opposite sex, this shall be grounds to modify permanent alimony. As we held most recently in Reiter v. Reiter, 258 Ga. 101 ( 365 S.E.2d 826) (1988), the relationship must be meretricious and continuous and open to provide grounds for modification. All of these elements must be present. Here, the relationship resulted in the birth of a child. Although the evidence supports a finding of periodic sexual encounters, there is no evidence that the parties dwelled together continuously or openly. Therefore, the relationship fails to meet the standard authorizing a modification of permanent alimony under OCGA § 19-6-19 (b).

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.

CLARKE, Presiding Justice.

DECIDED JANUARY 6, 1989.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DANIELS v. DANIELS
(Jan 6, 1989)