Trial Term held, and we agree, that the equivocal expert testing laboratory's report on the offending product, and the appellant's conclusory denial of supplying such product to the third-party plaintiff, did not provide a sufficient evidentiary showing as to negate the existence of any issues of fact, and to entitle it to summary judgment (Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853).
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ross, Milonas, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.